Suppr超能文献

Randomized, comparative trial of imipenem/cilastatin and moxalactam in the treatment of serious obstetric and gynecologic infections.

作者信息

Berkeley A S, Freedman K S, Hirsch J C, Ledger W J

出版信息

Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986 Mar;162(3):204-8.

PMID:3513346
Abstract

Thirty-four patients with pelvic inflammatory disease, postoperative, postabortal and postpartum infections were randomized to intravenous therapy with either 500 milligrams of imipenem and cilastatin sodium every six hours or 2 grams of moxalactam every eight hours for a minimum of four days. One patient in the moxalactam group was nonevaluable because of protocol noncompliance; three more patients had no bacteriologic pathogen isolated (two in the moxalactam group and one patient in the imipenem/cilastatin group). The two groups were similar with respect to age, diagnosis, etiologic agents and duration of therapy. Of the 17 evaluable patients in the imipenem/cilastatin group, all were complete clinical cures. Three patients in the imipenem/cilastatin group had persistence of at least one bacteriologic pathogen despite clinical cure and apparent laboratory evidence of susceptibility. Of the 13 evaluable patients in the moxalactam group, eight were complete clinical cures. Two more patients in that group were clinically improved enough to be discharged on oral antibiotics. There were three clinical failures in the moxalactam group, all of whom had group D streptococcus resistant to moxalactam. An additional three patients in the moxalactam group had other resistant organisms isolated despite clinical cure. Both drugs were well tolerated and no serious complications or side effects occurred in either group. Despite small numbers, our data suggest that imipenem and cilastatin is a more appropriate agent for initial treatment of obstetric and gynecologic infections than moxalactam.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验