Bakker M H, Vissink A, Raghoebar G M, Peters L L, Visser A
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 2022 Feb;129(2):87-93. doi: 10.5177/ntvt.2022.02.21115.
Cross-sectional studies have shown that elderly with a natural dentition or implant-retained overdenture have better general health outcomes than elderly with conventional dentures. It is not known whether these findings would be confirmed in longitudinal studies of such groups of elderly. Therefore, in this study a large group of elderly (aged 75 and over) with a natural dentition (n = 143,199), an implant-retained overdenture (n = 6,503) or conventional denture (n=18,420) were followed over a period of 8 years. Elderly with conventional dentures had chronic conditions more often, used more medication and had higher healthcare costs. Remarkably, the general health outcomes of elderly with an implant-retained overdenture declined over the period of 8 years. At the time the implant-retained overdenture was placed, their general health profile seemed comparable to that of elderly with a natural dentition, but as time progressed it declined to the level of elderly with conventional dentures.
横断面研究表明,拥有天然牙列或种植体固位覆盖义齿的老年人比佩戴传统假牙的老年人总体健康状况更好。尚不清楚这些发现在对此类老年人群体的纵向研究中是否会得到证实。因此,在本研究中,一大组年龄在75岁及以上、拥有天然牙列(n = 143,199)、种植体固位覆盖义齿(n = 6,503)或传统假牙(n = 18,420)的老年人被随访了8年。佩戴传统假牙的老年人更常患有慢性病,使用更多药物,医疗费用更高。值得注意的是,种植体固位覆盖义齿佩戴者的总体健康状况在8年期间有所下降。在植入种植体固位覆盖义齿时,他们的总体健康状况似乎与拥有天然牙列的老年人相当,但随着时间的推移,其健康状况下降到了佩戴传统假牙的老年人的水平。