• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

格鲁吉亚医护人员血液传播感染知-信-行调查

KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE AND PRACTICE SURVEY AMONG GEORGIAN HEALTH CARE WORKERS TOWARDS BLOOD BORNE INFECTIONS.

机构信息

1Health Research Union, Tbilisi, Georgia; 2Tbilisi State Medical University, Georgia.

1Health Research Union, Tbilisi, Georgia.

出版信息

Georgian Med News. 2022 Jan(322):21-25.

PMID:35134753
Abstract

The prevalence of viral hepatitis B and C in Georgia is among the highest in the region. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has selected Georgia as a pilot country for hepatitis C elimination program. Since 2015, Georgia launched a multi-year program of HCV elimination, including treatment of infected individuals with Direct Acting Antivirals (DAAs) and implementation of prevention programs, including infection control in health care facilities. The objective of this study was to evaluate the attitude and knowledge of blood borne infections (HIV, HCV, HBV) among Georgian Health Care Workers (HCWs). HCWs were recruited from six participating multi-profile hospitals and dental care institutions in three large cities of Georgia (Batumi (Western Georgia), Rustavi (Eastern Georgia) and the capital city, Tbilisi). A self - administered questionnaire included sections regarding sociodemographic and professional characteristics; awareness of blood-borne infections; practice for transmission risk reduction and perceived educational interventions acceptable among HCWs. The selection of HCWs was done through simple random sampling from the list of staff as a sampling frame. HCW's survey results were compared to the one from Dental health care workers (DHCWs). The total number of surveyed individuals was 442. Among them, 246 (55.6%) were HCWs (physicians, nurses, physician assistants and residents) from different departments, including family medicine (38.6 %), surgery (21.7%), gynecology (23.4%) and intensive care (13.9%) and 196 DHCWs (44.6%). Only few respondents (15.6%) correctly identified the prevalence of HIV infection in Georgia. HCWs have better understanding about the prevalence of viral hepatitis compared to DHCWs (Prevalence of HBsAg was correctly identified by 33.2 % vs 22.3%; prevalence of HCV- by 18.9 % vs 17.3%). Knowledge regarding transmission risks of blood-borne infections (HIV, HCV, HBV) among HCWs is higher compared to DHCWS (for HIV 73% vs 45.3%, for HCV 49.2% vs 37.9% and for HBV 54.8% vs 33.7%) (p<0.005). Vast majority of DHCWs as well as HCWs believed that probability of transmission of blood-borne infections after contaminated needle stick is 50-70% (p<0.05). There was a poor knowledge on availability of post exposure prophylaxis (42.9% of HCWs compare to 36.1% DHCWs believed that HCV post-exposure prophylaxis is available) (p<0.005). The practice of using facemasks (81% vs 74.4% always use, respectively), protective clothes (96.8% vs 83.3% always use) and eyewears (46.9% vs 27.4% always use) was reported by DHCWs and HCWs. Some nosocomial risk events were reported by higher proportion of DHCWs, compared to HCWs and included accidental needle stick injuries (65.1% vs 45.5%) and blood splashes (48.3% vs 28.2%). Cuts with contaminated instruments was more common among HCWs compared to DCHWs (41.4% vs 35.1%) during medical procedures. The study suggests that level of knowledge on blood borne infections among both HCWs and DHCWs is not adequate. Data from this study can be utilized to design educational programs for Georgian HCWs/DHCWs to improve knowledge and practice about blood borne diseases.

摘要

格鲁吉亚的乙型和丙型病毒性肝炎流行率在该地区属于最高之列。美国疾病控制与预防中心 (CDC) 已选择格鲁吉亚作为丙型肝炎消除计划的试点国家。自 2015 年以来,格鲁吉亚启动了一项多年丙型肝炎消除计划,包括使用直接作用抗病毒药物 (DAAs) 治疗感染个体以及实施预防计划,包括医疗机构的感染控制。本研究的目的是评估格鲁吉亚卫生保健工作者 (HCWs) 对血液传播感染(HIV、HCV、HBV)的态度和知识。HCWs 从格鲁吉亚三个大城市的六家参与多专业医院和牙科医疗机构中招募(西部的巴统、东部的鲁斯塔维以及首都第比利斯)。一份自我管理的问卷包括社会人口统计学和职业特征部分;对血液传播感染的认识;降低传播风险的实践以及 HCWs 认为可接受的感知教育干预措施。通过从员工名单中简单随机抽样选择 HCWs 作为抽样框架。将 HCW 的调查结果与牙科保健工作者 (DHCWs) 的结果进行比较。共调查了 442 人。其中,246 人(55.6%)是来自不同科室的 HCWs(医生、护士、医生助理和住院医师),包括家庭医学科(38.6%)、外科(21.7%)、妇产科(23.4%)和重症监护室(13.9%),196 人是 DHCWs(44.6%)。只有少数受访者(15.6%)正确识别出格鲁吉亚艾滋病毒感染的流行率。HCWs 对病毒性肝炎的流行率的了解要好于 DHCWs(HBsAg 的流行率分别为 33.2%和 22.3%;HCV 的流行率为 18.9%和 17.3%)。HCWs 对血液传播感染(HIV、HCV、HBV)的传播风险的认识要高于 DHCWS(HIV 为 73%,而 DHCWS 为 45.3%;HCV 为 49.2%,而 DHCWS 为 37.9%;HBV 为 54.8%,而 DHCWS 为 33.7%)(p<0.005)。大多数 DHCWs 和 HCWs 都认为,被污染的针头刺伤后血液传播感染的概率为 50-70%(p<0.05)。对于 HCV 暴露后预防是否可用,HCWs(42.9%)和 DHCWs(36.1%)的认知都很差(p<0.005)。DHCWs 和 HCWs 都报告了使用口罩(81%和 74.4%,分别总是使用)、防护服(96.8%和 83.3%,总是使用)和护目镜(46.9%和 27.4%,总是使用)。与 HCWs 相比,DHCWs 报告了更高比例的医院感染风险事件,包括意外针刺伤(65.1%和 45.5%)和血液喷溅(48.3%和 28.2%)。在医疗过程中,与 DCHWs 相比,HCWs 更常发生与污染器械相关的切割伤(41.4%和 35.1%)。研究表明,HCWs 和 DHCWs 对血液传播感染的知识水平都不足够。本研究的数据可用于为格鲁吉亚 HCWs/DHCWs 设计教育计划,以提高他们对血液传播疾病的知识和实践水平。

相似文献

1
KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE AND PRACTICE SURVEY AMONG GEORGIAN HEALTH CARE WORKERS TOWARDS BLOOD BORNE INFECTIONS.格鲁吉亚医护人员血液传播感染知-信-行调查
Georgian Med News. 2022 Jan(322):21-25.
2
Knowledge, attitudes and practice survey on blood-borne diseases among dental health care workers in Georgia.格鲁吉亚牙科保健工作者血源性疾病知识、态度及行为调查
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2018 Oct 31;12(10):864-870. doi: 10.3855/jidc.9911.
3
Occupational exposure to body fluids among health care workers in Georgia.格鲁吉亚医护人员的体液职业暴露。
Occup Med (Lond). 2012 Dec;62(8):620-6. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqs121. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
4
A prospective look at the burden of sharps injuries and splashes among trauma health care workers in developing countries: true picture or tip of iceberg.对发展中国家创伤医护人员锐器伤和飞溅伤负担的前瞻性研究:真实情况还是冰山一角?
Injury. 2014 Sep;45(9):1470-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
5
Seroprevalence of hepatitis B and C virus infections among health students and health care workers in the Najran region, southwestern Saudi Arabia: the need for national guidelines for health students.沙特阿拉伯西南部奈季兰地区健康专业学生和医护人员中乙型和丙型肝炎病毒感染的血清流行率:制定针对健康专业学生的国家指南的必要性
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jun 9;14:577. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-577.
6
Epidemiology and management of occupational exposure to blood borne viral infections in a resource poor setting: the case for availability of post exposure prophylaxis.资源匮乏地区职业性血源病毒感染的流行病学与管理:暴露后预防措施可得性的案例
Niger J Clin Pract. 2007 Jun;10(2):100-4.
7
Healthcare workers and health care-associated infections: knowledge, attitudes, and behavior in emergency departments in Italy.医护人员与医疗保健相关感染:意大利急诊部门的知识、态度和行为。
BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Feb 23;10:35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-35.
8
Estimation of the risk of bloodborne pathogens to health care workers after a needlestick injury in Taiwan.台湾医护人员针刺伤后血源性病原体感染健康风险的评估。
Am J Infect Control. 2002 Feb;30(1):15-20. doi: 10.1067/mic.2002.119928.
9
Blood borne viral infections among Danish health care workers--frequent blood exposure but low prevalence of infection.丹麦医护人员中的血源性病毒感染——血液暴露频繁但感染率低。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19(1):61-7. doi: 10.1023/b:ejep.0000013397.51614.d4.
10
Low levels of awareness, vaccine coverage, and the need for boosters among health care workers in tertiary care hospitals in India.印度三级护理医院医护人员的认知水平、疫苗接种覆盖率及加强针需求较低。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Nov;23(11):1710-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05483.x. Epub 2008 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge and Training Needs in Nosocomial Infection among Hospital Staff in the City of Kielce, Poland: A Cross-Sectional Study.波兰凯尔采市医院工作人员医院感染方面的知识与培训需求:一项横断面研究。
J Nurs Manag. 2024 Apr 9;2024:9243232. doi: 10.1155/2024/9243232. eCollection 2024.