Suppr超能文献

拇腕掌关节骨关节炎行大多角骨切除术后重建与不重建或肌腱置入治疗的结局的 Meta 分析。

A Meta-Analysis of the Outcomes of Ligament Reconstruction Compared to No Reconstruction with or without Tendon Interposition Following Trapeziectomy for Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis.

机构信息

Unit for Hand & Microsurgery, GECOT, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.

Pulvertaft Hand Centre, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2022 Feb;27(1):22-31. doi: 10.1142/S2424835522500175. Epub 2022 Feb 9.

Abstract

The outcomes of trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) compared to the trapeziectomy (T) alone or in combination with tendon interposition (TIA) in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) of the carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) of the thumb are still debated. The aim of this study is to conduct a meta-analysis to determine whether the outcomes of LRTI were better compared to T or TIA. A meta-analysis of randomised trials that included the outcomes of patients with thumb CMCJ OA that underwent LRTI, T or TIA with at least 1 year follow-up. The outcomes included number of patients with pain 1 year after surgery (NPP), Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), key pinch strength, patient reported outcome measurements (PROMs) and number of adverse effect (AEs). The effect was assessed using mean difference for quantitative variables (VAS pain and key pinch), standardised mean difference for PROMs and relative risk for binary variables (NPP and AEs). Seven studies met the inclusion criteria (857 participants: 438 LRTI vs 419 T/TIA). We did not find significant differences between LRTI and T/TIA in NPP, VAS pain, key pinch at 1 year and 5 years or more, PROMs, and AEs at 1 year and at 5 years or more after surgery. The outcomes of LRTI are not superior to T or TIA in the treatment of OA of the thumb CMCJ. Level I (Therapeutic).

摘要

韧带重建和肌腱置入(LRTI)与单纯腕掌关节(T)或与肌腱置入(TIA)联合治疗拇指腕掌关节(CMCJ)骨关节炎(OA)的疗效仍存在争议。本研究旨在进行荟萃分析,以确定 LRTI 的疗效是否优于 T 或 TIA。

这是一项纳入了至少 1 年随访的接受 LRTI、T 或 TIA 治疗的拇指 CMCJ OA 患者的随机试验的荟萃分析。结果包括术后 1 年疼痛的患者数量(NPP)、疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS 疼痛)、关键捏力、患者报告的结局测量(PROMs)和不良事件(AEs)的数量。采用定量变量(VAS 疼痛和关键捏力)的均数差、PROMs 的标准化均数差和二项变量(NPP 和 AEs)的相对风险来评估效果。

有 7 项研究符合纳入标准(857 名参与者:438 名 LRTI 与 419 名 T/TIA)。我们未发现 LRTI 与 T/TIA 在术后 1 年和 5 年及以上的 NPP、VAS 疼痛、关键捏力、1 年和 5 年及以上的 PROMs 和 AEs 之间存在显著差异。

LRTI 在治疗拇指 CMCJ OA 方面的疗效并不优于 T 或 TIA。

1 级(治疗性)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验