Rehabilitation Center, Fukushima Medical University Hospital.
Department of Pain Medicine, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine.
Fukushima J Med Sci. 2022 Apr 8;68(1):25-35. doi: 10.5387/fms.2021-19. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
Aiming to improve post-disaster care of medical staff, we conducted an early and ongoing assessment of post-disaster psychologic distress and quality of life (QOL) in one center of a disaster-response hospital. Twelve days after the Great East Japan Earthquake, as the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant crisis was unfolding, we began a survey to examine the physical and mental state of medical staff to assess their motivation toward work. Surveys were administered in March 2011 (Survey 1), March 2012 (Survey 2), March 2013 (Survey 3), March 2014 (Survey 4), and March 2015 (Survey 5). Participants completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), EuroQol (EQ-5D), and MOS Short-Form 36-item Health Survey (SF-36). Although BDI scores significantly improved over time following Survey 1, participants in their 30s had significantly higher Survey 2 scores than those in their 40s/50s, and significantly higher Survey 3 scores than those in their 20s. STAI scores significantly improved over time following Survey 1. However, participants in their 30s had significantly higher Survey 3 scores than those in their 20s. EQ-5D scores did not significantly vary among survey time points or age groups. SF-36 physical functioning, role physical, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health subscale scores significantly improved over time. In conclusion, post-disaster longitudinal changes, including recovery period, differed among age groups. Thus, age should be taken into account in longitudinal evaluations of psychologic distress and QOL in medical staff after a disaster and, as more recent events suggest, during a pandemic.
为了改善灾难后医护人员的护理工作,我们对一家灾难应对医院的一个中心在灾难后的心理困扰和生活质量(QOL)进行了早期和持续评估。在东日本大地震发生 12 天后,随着福岛第一核电站危机的爆发,我们开始了一项调查,以检查医护人员的身心状态,评估他们的工作动力。调查于 2011 年 3 月(调查 1)、2012 年 3 月(调查 2)、2013 年 3 月(调查 3)、2014 年 3 月(调查 4)和 2015 年 3 月(调查 5)进行。参与者完成了贝克抑郁量表(BDI)、状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)、欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)和 MOS 短式 36 项健康调查(SF-36)。尽管 BDI 评分在调查 1 后随时间显著改善,但 30 多岁的参与者在调查 2 中的评分明显高于 40/50 多岁的参与者,在调查 3 中的评分明显高于 20 多岁的参与者。STAI 评分在调查 1 后随时间显著改善。然而,30 多岁的参与者在调查 3 中的评分明显高于 20 多岁的参与者。EQ-5D 评分在不同的调查时间点或年龄组之间没有显著差异。SF-36 生理功能、角色生理、社会功能、角色情感和心理健康子量表评分随时间显著改善。总之,灾难后纵向变化,包括恢复期,在不同年龄组之间存在差异。因此,在灾难后和最近的事件表明,在大流行期间,应考虑年龄因素,对医护人员的心理困扰和 QOL 进行纵向评估。