Suppr超能文献

初榨椰子油拉舌法与棕榈油拉舌法对牙龈炎症患者辅助口腔卫生护理的微生物学影响:一项随机对照临床试验

Microbiological Effects of Virgin Coconut Oil Pulling in Comparison with Palm Oil Pulling as an Adjunctive Oral Hygiene Care for Patients with Gingival Inflammation: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Siripaiboonpong Nisachon, Matangkasombut Oranart, Pengcharoen Haris, Boonchaiyapluk Bongkoj, Rujiraprasert Phakvalunch, Srithanyarat Supreda Suphanantachat

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Center of Excellence in Periodontal Disease and Dental Implant, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2022 Jan-Feb;26(1):58-63. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_768_20. Epub 2021 Sep 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Virgin coconut oil (VCO) pulling has antimicrobial activity and has been promoted as beneficial to oral health; however, limited information exists on its clinical effectiveness. This study aimed to compare the microbiological effects of VCO with palm oil (PO) pulling when used as an adjunctive oral hygiene care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-six volunteers with gingival inflammation were randomly assigned to start with (1) VCO (test) and (2) PO (control) interventions in a crossover design. Oil pulling was performed for 28 days adjunctively to oral hygiene routine. After a 21-day wash-out period, the participants switched the oil type and restarted the protocol. Plaque samples were collected for microbial culture at baseline, after the first oil pulling period, after washout, and after the second oil pulling period. The total, aerobic, and anaerobic bacteria and (MS) counts were recorded. The mean differences between VCO and PO were compared by paired -test.

RESULTS

The number of total, aerobic, or anaerobic bacteria after 28 days of oil pulling was not significantly different from baseline in both PO and VCO groups. However, PO pulling demonstrated a significant reduction from baseline of MS count ( = 0.010), while VCO pulling showed no significant reduction. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean changes of any microbiological parameters between the two treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

VCO pulling did not show statistically significant superior benefit against plaque bacteria over PO pulling. Using PO pulling as an adjunctive oral hygiene care may reduce the number of MS, but this requires further investigations.

摘要

目的

初榨椰子油(VCO)含漱具有抗菌活性,且一直被宣传对口腔健康有益;然而,关于其临床效果的信息有限。本研究旨在比较VCO与棕榈油(PO)含漱作为辅助口腔卫生护理时的微生物学效应。

材料与方法

36名患有牙龈炎症的志愿者被随机分配,采用交叉设计开始(1)VCO(试验组)和(2)PO(对照组)干预。在日常口腔卫生护理的基础上进行28天的油漱。在21天的洗脱期后,参与者更换油的类型并重新开始该方案。在基线、第一个油漱期后、洗脱期后和第二个油漱期后收集菌斑样本进行微生物培养。记录总菌数、需氧菌数、厌氧菌数和变形链球菌(MS)计数。通过配对t检验比较VCO和PO之间的平均差异。

结果

在PO组和VCO组中,油漱28天后的总菌数、需氧菌数或厌氧菌数与基线相比均无显著差异。然而,PO含漱显示MS计数较基线有显著降低(P = 0.010),而VCO含漱则无显著降低。两种治疗之间任何微生物学参数的平均变化均无统计学显著差异。

结论

VCO含漱在对抗菌斑细菌方面没有显示出比PO含漱在统计学上有显著的优势。使用PO含漱作为辅助口腔卫生护理可能会减少MS的数量,但这需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/510d/8796787/94cd49a8ad2d/JISP-26-58-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验