Dwivedi Mahendra Kumar, Bhende Vikrant, Panchbhaiyye Dnyaneshwar Narayanrao, Bayaskar Madhura Vijay
Department of Radio Diagnosis, Shri Shankaracharya Institute of Medical Sciences, Junwani, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh, India.
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2022 Jan 10;31(4):867-872. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1739375. eCollection 2021 Oct.
Percutaneous vertebroplasty has been used for treatment of intractable painful fractures of vertebral bodies. With the help of refined procedures and standard techniques, the interventional radiologist can now offer help to orthopedics and neurosurgeons in these cases, which include treatment of vertebral compression fracture. Vertebroplasty is aimed at reducing the pain induced by collapse. Vertebroplasty is the standard mode of treatment for vertebral collapse, and in our study, bipedicular vertebroplasty was compared with unipedicular approach as bipedicular vertebroplasty is the routinely used approach. To compare efficacy of unipedicular percutaneous vertebroplasty with that of bipedicular percutaneous vertebroplasty. A total of 52 vertebroplasties were done over a period of 2 years. Out of 52 patients, 28 patients underwent unipedicular vertebroplasty and 24 patients underwent bipedicular vertebroplasty. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were used to assess the pain prior to vertebroplasty and after vertebroplasty. Efficacy of the two procedures were assessed by comparing VAS scores. There was no statistically significant difference observed in the preprocedure and postprocedure VAS scores ( -value < 0.0001, < 0.0001, respectively). The mean procedure time was lesser in unipedicular vertebroplasty (41.9 ± 3.90) than bipedicular vertebroplasty (54.5 ± 3.4). Unipedicular vertebroplasty is as effective as bipedicular vertebroplasty, as there is insignificant difference in postprocedure VAS scores between the unipedicular and bipedicular vertebroplasty.
经皮椎体成形术已用于治疗椎体顽固性疼痛性骨折。借助精细的操作程序和标准技术,介入放射科医生现在可以在这些病例中为骨科医生和神经外科医生提供帮助,这些病例包括椎体压缩骨折的治疗。椎体成形术旨在减轻塌陷引起的疼痛。椎体成形术是椎体塌陷的标准治疗方式,在我们的研究中,将双侧椎弓根椎体成形术与单侧椎弓根入路进行了比较,因为双侧椎弓根椎体成形术是常规使用的方法。
比较单侧经皮椎体成形术与双侧经皮椎体成形术的疗效。
在2年的时间里共进行了52例椎体成形术。在52例患者中,28例患者接受了单侧椎体成形术,24例患者接受了双侧椎体成形术。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估椎体成形术前和术后的疼痛情况。通过比较VAS评分评估两种手术的疗效。
术前和术后VAS评分均未观察到统计学上的显著差异( 值分别<0.0001,<0.0001)。单侧椎体成形术的平均手术时间(41.9±3.90)比双侧椎体成形术(54.5±3.4)短。
单侧椎体成形术与双侧椎体成形术效果相同,因为单侧和双侧椎体成形术后VAS评分差异不显著。