Zaino Domenica, Serchi Valeria, Giannini Fabio, Pucci Barbara, Veneri Giacomo, Pretegiani Elena, Rosini Francesca, Monti Lucia, Rufa Alessandra
Eye tracking and Visual Application Lab (EVA Lab), Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Neurology and Neurometabolic Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Brain. 2023 Jan 5;146(1):266-277. doi: 10.1093/brain/awac050.
Two clinical phenotypes characterize the onset of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS): the spinal variant, with symptoms beginning in the limbs, and the bulbar variant, affecting firstly speech and swallowing. The two variants show some distinct features in the histopathology, localization and prognosis, but to which extent they really differ clinically and pathologically remains to be clarified. Recent neuropathological and neuroimaging studies have suggested a broader spreading of the neurodegenerative process in ALS, extending beyond the motor areas, toward other cortical and deep grey matter regions, many of which are involved in visual processing and saccadic control. Indeed, a wide range of eye movement deficits have been reported in ALS, but they have never been used to distinguish the two ALS variants. Since quantifying eye movements is a very sensitive and specific method for the study of brain networks, we compared different saccadic and visual search behaviours across spinal ALS patients (n = 12), bulbar ALS patients (n = 6) and healthy control subjects (n = 13), along with cognitive and MRI measures, with the aim to define more accurately the two patients subgroups and possibly clarify a different underlying neural impairment. We found separate profiles of visually-guided saccades between spinal (short saccades) and bulbar (slow saccades) ALS, which could result from the pathologic involvement of different pathways. We suggest an early involvement of the parieto-collicular-cerebellar network in spinal ALS and the fronto-brainstem circuit in bulbar ALS. Overall, our data confirm the diagnostic value of the eye movements analysis in ALS and add new insight on the involved neural networks.
肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)的发病有两种临床表型:脊髓型,症状始于四肢;延髓型,首先影响言语和吞咽。这两种类型在组织病理学、定位和预后方面表现出一些不同特征,但它们在临床和病理上的实际差异程度仍有待阐明。最近的神经病理学和神经影像学研究表明,ALS中神经退行性过程的传播范围更广,超出了运动区域,延伸至其他皮质和深部灰质区域,其中许多区域参与视觉处理和眼球运动控制。事实上,ALS患者中已报告了广泛的眼球运动缺陷,但这些缺陷从未被用于区分两种ALS类型。由于量化眼球运动是研究脑网络的一种非常敏感和特异的方法,我们比较了脊髓型ALS患者(n = 12)、延髓型ALS患者(n = 6)和健康对照者(n = 13)的不同眼球运动和视觉搜索行为,以及认知和MRI测量结果,旨在更准确地定义这两个患者亚组,并可能阐明不同的潜在神经损伤。我们发现脊髓型(短扫视)和延髓型(慢扫视)ALS之间在视觉引导扫视方面有不同的特征,这可能是由于不同通路的病理受累所致。我们认为脊髓型ALS中顶叶 - 视丘 - 小脑网络早期受累,延髓型ALS中额叶 - 脑干回路早期受累。总体而言,我们的数据证实了眼球运动分析在ALS中的诊断价值,并为所涉及的神经网络提供了新的见解。