Suppr超能文献

亚急性和慢性卒中患者的记忆引导性眼跳:N-PEP-12临床研究的二次数据分析

Memory-Guided Saccades in Subacute and Chronic Stroke: Secondary Data Analysis of the N-PEP-12 Clinical Study.

作者信息

Ștefănescu Emanuel, Balea Maria, Chelaru Vlad-Florin, Jemna Nicoleta, Verișezan Roșu Olivia, Truță Anamaria, Stan Adina Dora, Chira Diana, Strilciuc Ștefan, Mureșanu Dafin

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

RoNeuro Institute for Neurological Research and Diagnostic, 400364 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

出版信息

Biomedicines. 2024 Jul 26;12(8):1678. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12081678.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ischemic stroke (IS) often leads to cognitive and motor impairments. This study aimed to investigate whether Memory-Guided Saccade Tasks (MGSTs) could be used to assess cognitive function in stroke patients.

METHODS

A secondary data analysis was conducted on 62 individuals with supratentorial IS. Eye-tracking metrics from MGST were correlated with established neuropsychological assessments, including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

RESULTS

Age correlated negatively with memory-guided saccade (MGS) accuracy (ρ = -0.274) and positively with late errors (ρ = 0.327). Higher Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores were associated with faster corrective saccades (ρ = 0.259). Increased anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D) levels correlated with higher early error rates (ρ = 0.325 and ρ = 0.311, respectively). The Color Trails Test and Digit Span test performance also correlated with various MGS parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

While some correlations were found between cognitive measures and eye-tracking metrics, further research is needed to validate MGST as a tool for cognitive assessment in a more homogenous stroke population.

摘要

背景

缺血性中风(IS)常导致认知和运动障碍。本研究旨在调查记忆引导扫视任务(MGST)是否可用于评估中风患者的认知功能。

方法

对62例幕上缺血性中风患者进行了二次数据分析。MGST的眼动追踪指标与既定的神经心理学评估相关,包括蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)和医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)。

结果

年龄与记忆引导扫视(MGS)准确性呈负相关(ρ = -0.274),与后期错误呈正相关(ρ = 0.327)。较高的蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)分数与更快的纠正扫视相关(ρ = 0.259)。焦虑(HADS-A)和抑郁(HADS-D)水平升高与较高的早期错误率相关(分别为ρ = 0.325和ρ = 0.311)。色线测试和数字广度测试表现也与各种MGS参数相关。

结论

虽然在认知测量和眼动追踪指标之间发现了一些相关性,但需要进一步研究以验证MGST作为更同质中风人群认知评估工具的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9601/11351517/bfd78bfc8d02/biomedicines-12-01678-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验