• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

危重症患者中与β-内酰胺类神经毒性相关的发生率和预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。

Incidence and Predictive Factors Associated with Beta-Lactam Neurotoxicity in the Critically Ill: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN, 55902, USA.

Division of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

Neurocrit Care. 2022 Aug;37(1):73-80. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01442-1. Epub 2022 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1007/s12028-022-01442-1
PMID:35137352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9288522/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Beta-lactam neurotoxicity is a relatively uncommon yet clinically significant adverse effect in critically ill patients. This study sought to define the incidence of neurotoxicity, derive a prediction model for beta-lactam neurotoxicity, and then validate the model in an independent cohort of critically ill adults.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study evaluated critically ill patients treated with ≥ 48 h of cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, or meropenem. Two separate cohorts were created: a derivation cohort and a validation cohort. Patients were screened for beta-lactam neurotoxicity by using search terms and diagnosis codes, followed by clinical adjudication using a standardized adverse event scoring tool. Multivariable regression models and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator were used to identify surrogates for neurotoxicity and develop a multivariable prediction model.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of beta-lactam neurotoxicity was 2.6% (n/N = 34/1323) in the derivation cohort and 2.1% in the validation cohort (n/N = 16/767). The final multivariable neurotoxicity assessment tool included weight, Charlson comorbidity score, age, and estimated creatinine clearance as predictors of neurotoxicity. Incidence of neurotoxicity reached 4% in those with a body mass index more than 30 kg/m. Use of the candidate variables in the neurotoxicity assessment tool suggested that a score more than 35 would identify a patient at high risk for neurotoxicity with 75% sensitivity and 54% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

In this single center cohort of critically ill patients, beta-lactam neurotoxicity was demonstrated less frequently than previously reported. We identified obesity as a novel risk factor for the development of neurotoxicity. The prediction model needs to be further refined before it can be used in clinical practice as a tool to avoid drug-related harm.

摘要

背景

β-内酰胺类神经毒性是危重症患者中一种相对罕见但具有临床重要意义的不良反应。本研究旨在确定神经毒性的发生率,为β-内酰胺类神经毒性建立预测模型,并在另一组独立的危重症成人患者中验证该模型。

方法

本回顾性队列研究评估了接受≥48 小时头孢吡肟、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦或美罗培南治疗的危重症患者。创建了两个独立的队列:一个推导队列和一个验证队列。通过使用搜索词和诊断代码筛选出β-内酰胺类神经毒性患者,然后使用标准化不良事件评分工具进行临床判断。使用多变量回归模型和最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)来识别神经毒性的替代指标,并建立多变量预测模型。

结果

在推导队列中,β-内酰胺类神经毒性的总发生率为 2.6%(n/N=34/1323),验证队列中为 2.1%(n/N=16/767)。最终的多变量神经毒性评估工具包括体重、Charlson 合并症评分、年龄和估计的肌酐清除率作为神经毒性的预测指标。体重指数(BMI)超过 30 kg/m2的患者,神经毒性发生率达到 4%。使用神经毒性评估工具中的候选变量提示,评分超过 35 分可识别出神经毒性高风险患者,其敏感性为 75%,特异性为 54%。

结论

在本单中心危重症患者队列中,β-内酰胺类神经毒性的发生率低于先前报道。我们发现肥胖是神经毒性发生的一个新的危险因素。该预测模型需要进一步细化,才能在临床实践中作为避免药物相关伤害的工具使用。

相似文献

1
Incidence and Predictive Factors Associated with Beta-Lactam Neurotoxicity in the Critically Ill: A Retrospective Cohort Study.危重症患者中与β-内酰胺类神经毒性相关的发生率和预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Aug;37(1):73-80. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01442-1. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
2
Comparative Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Vancomycin with Concomitant Piperacillin-Tazobactam or Cefepime: A Retrospective Cohort Study.接受万古霉素联合哌拉西林 - 他唑巴坦或头孢吡肟的重症患者急性肾损伤的比较发病率:一项回顾性队列研究
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 May;36(5):463-71. doi: 10.1002/phar.1738. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
3
Duration of Exposure to Antipseudomonal β-Lactam Antibiotics in the Critically Ill and Development of New Resistance.重症患者接触抗假单胞菌β-内酰胺类抗生素的时间与新耐药性的产生。
Pharmacotherapy. 2019 Mar;39(3):261-270. doi: 10.1002/phar.2201. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
4
Vancomycin with concomitant piperacillin/tazobactam vs. cefepime or meropenem associated acute kidney injury in the critically ill: A multicenter propensity score-matched study.万古霉素联合哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与头孢吡肟或美罗培南相关的危重症患者急性肾损伤:一项多中心倾向评分匹配研究。
J Crit Care. 2022 Feb;67:134-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.10.018. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
5
Optimal antipseudomonal ꞵ-lactam drug dosing recommendations in critically-ill Asian patients receiving CRRT.重症亚洲 CRRT 患者中最佳抗假单胞菌 β-内酰胺药物剂量推荐。
J Crit Care. 2022 Dec;72:154172. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154172. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
6
Is high-dose β-lactam therapy associated with excessive drug toxicity in critically ill patients?高剂量β-内酰胺类治疗与危重症患者药物毒性过高有关吗?
Minerva Anestesiol. 2016 Sep;82(9):957-65. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
7
Case-control study of drug monitoring of β-lactams in obese critically ill patients.β-内酰胺类药物在肥胖危重症患者中的药物监测的病例对照研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Feb;57(2):708-15. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01083-12. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
8
Too much of a good thing: a retrospective study of β-lactam concentration-toxicity relationships.物极必反:β-内酰胺浓度与毒性关系的回顾性研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Oct 1;72(10):2891-2897. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx209.
9
Beta-lactam exposure and safety in intermittent or continuous infusion in critically ill children: an observational monocenter study.重症患儿间歇性或持续输注β-内酰胺类药物的暴露情况与安全性:一项单中心观察性研究
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Mar;182(3):965-973. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04716-0. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
10
β-Lactam Dosage Regimens in Septic Patients with Augmented Renal Clearance.β-内酰胺类药物在伴有增强肾清除率的脓毒症患者中的剂量方案。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Aug 27;62(9). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02534-17. Print 2018 Sep.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards a prescribing monitoring system for medication safety evaluation within electronic health records: a scoping review.迈向电子健康记录中用于药物安全评估的处方监测系统:一项范围综述
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03096-3.
2
Cord-lamina angle and foraminal diameter as key predictors of C5 palsy after anterior cervical decompression and fusion surgery.颈椎前路减压融合术后C5麻痹的关键预测指标——脊髓-椎板角和椎间孔直径
Open Med (Wars). 2025 May 7;20(1):20251162. doi: 10.1515/med-2025-1162. eCollection 2025.
3
Use of the DMAIC Lean Six Sigma quality improvement framework to improve beta-lactam antibiotic adequacy in the critically ill.

本文引用的文献

1
Cefepime is Associated with Acute Encephalopathy in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.头孢吡肟与危重症患者急性脑病相关:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
Neurocrit Care. 2020 Dec;33(3):695-700. doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-01035-w.
2
Effect of Cefepime on Neurotoxicity Development in Critically Ill Adults With Renal Dysfunction.头孢吡肟对肾功能不全的危重症成年患者神经毒性发生的影响。
Chest. 2020 Jul;158(1):157-163. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.01.051. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
3
Cefepime neurotoxicity: thresholds and risk factors. A retrospective cohort study.
使用 DMAIC 精益六西格玛质量改进框架提高危重症患者β-内酰胺类抗生素的使用适宜性。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2024 Jul 19;36(3). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzae062.
4
'How to' Guide for Pharmacist-led Implementation of Beta-Lactam Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in the Critically Ill.药师主导的危重症患者β-内酰胺类药物治疗药物监测实施“操作指南”
J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2023 Aug;6(8):964-975. doi: 10.1002/jac5.1819. Epub 2023 May 29.
5
Gummatous Neurosyphilis With Transient Worsening of Neurological Symptoms After Treatment Initiation.治疗开始后出现神经症状短暂加重的树胶肿性神经梅毒
Neurohospitalist. 2023 Oct;13(4):403-405. doi: 10.1177/19418744231175564. Epub 2023 May 10.
6
Update on Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Beta-Lactam Antibiotics in Critically Ill Patients-A Narrative Review.重症患者β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗药物监测的最新进展——一项叙述性综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Mar 13;12(3):568. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12030568.
7
Adequacy of cefepime concentrations in the early phase of critical illness: A case for precision pharmacotherapy.危重病早期头孢吡肟浓度是否足够:精准药物治疗的一个案例。
Pharmacotherapy. 2023 Nov;43(11):1112-1120. doi: 10.1002/phar.2766. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
8
Progression of Kidney Injury with the Combination of Vancomycin and Piperacillin-Tazobactam or Cefepime in Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury.万古霉素与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦或头孢吡肟联用在脓毒症相关性急性肾损伤中导致肾损伤进展的情况
Front Nephrol. 2022;2. doi: 10.3389/fneph.2022.995358. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
9
Effectiveness and Safety of Beta-Lactam Antibiotics with and without Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pneumonia or Bloodstream Infection.β-内酰胺类抗生素在铜绿假单胞菌性肺炎或菌血症患者中进行治疗药物监测与不进行治疗药物监测的有效性和安全性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Oct 18;66(10):e0064622. doi: 10.1128/aac.00646-22. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
10
Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Cefepime.头孢吡肟的临床药代动力学和药效学。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2022 Jul;61(7):929-953. doi: 10.1007/s40262-022-01137-y. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
头孢吡肟的神经毒性:阈值和危险因素。一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Mar;26(3):333-339. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.06.028. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
4
Cephalosporin-related neurotoxicity: Metabolic encephalopathy or non-convulsive status epilepticus?头孢菌素相关神经毒性:代谢性脑病或非惊厥性癫痫持续状态?
J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Sep;67:163-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.05.035. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
5
Control of Confounding and Reporting of Results in Causal Inference Studies. Guidance for Authors from Editors of Respiratory, Sleep, and Critical Care Journals.因果推断研究中的混杂因素控制与结果报告。呼吸、睡眠和重症监护期刊编辑给作者的指南。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Jan;16(1):22-28. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201808-564PS.
6
Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury Among Critically Ill Patients With Brief Empiric Use of Antipseudomonal β-Lactams With Vancomycin.抗菌药物降阶梯治疗策略对重症监护病房患者急性肾损伤的影响
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Apr 24;68(9):1456-1462. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy724.
7
Cefepime-induced neurotoxicity: a systematic review.头孢吡肟诱导的神经毒性:系统评价。
Crit Care. 2017 Nov 14;21(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1856-1.
8
Too much of a good thing: a retrospective study of β-lactam concentration-toxicity relationships.物极必反:β-内酰胺浓度与毒性关系的回顾性研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Oct 1;72(10):2891-2897. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx209.
9
Cefepime plasma concentrations and clinical toxicity: a retrospective cohort study.头孢吡肟血药浓度与临床毒性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017 Jul;23(7):454-459. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.01.005. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
10
Not all β-lactams are equal regarding neurotoxicity.并非所有β-内酰胺类药物在神经毒性方面都是相同的。
Crit Care. 2016 Oct 27;20(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1522-z.