Sports Surgery Clinic, Dublin, Ireland.
National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Feb;50(2):327-333. doi: 10.1177/03635465211063917.
Humeral avulsion glenohumeral ligament (HAGL) lesions are often underreported but have been shown to occur in up to 10% of cases of anterior shoulder instability.
To compare clinical outcomes and recurrence rates of patients with HAGL lesions undergoing open stabilization for anterior shoulder instability versus a pair-matched control.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
A retrospective review of all patients who underwent both arthroscopic and open stabilization procedures with a minimum 24-month follow-up was performed. Patients with HAGL lesions were pair-matched in a 1:6 ratio for age, sex, sport, level of preoperative play, and follow-up length with those without HAGL lesions who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair alone. Return to play (RTP), the level of return, and the timing of return were assessed. In addition, recurrence, visual analog scale for pain (VAS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Rowe score, satisfaction, and whether they would undergo the same surgery again were compared.
A total of 15 patients with HAGL lesions who underwent shoulder stabilization procedures were included, with a mean age of 21.5 ± 4.1 years and mean follow-up of 53.5 ± 17.4 months, and were pair-matched to 90 patients without HAGL lesions. Overall, there was no significant difference in any of the clinical outcome scores (VAS, Rowe, SSV, satisfaction) used between the 2 groups (1.6 vs 1.7, = .86; 83.4 vs 88.0, = .06; 85.7 vs 87.2, = .76; and 86.7% vs 94.5%, = .26, respectively). In addition, there were no significant differences in terms of overall rates, levels, and timing of RTP between the 2 groups (93.3% vs 90.0%, > .99; 80.0% vs 78.9%, > .99; and 5.3 ± 2.2 vs 5.9 ± 2.9 months, = .45, respectively). There was no significant difference in the rates of apprehension, subluxation, and recurrent instability between the HAGL and pair-matched control groups (26.7% vs 26.7%, > .99; 6.7% vs 3.3%, = .47; and 13.3% vs 6.7% months, = .32, respectively).
Patients with anterior shoulder instability undergoing surgical stabilization with open HAGL repair demonstrate excellent functional outcomes and high rates of RTP, with low rates of recurrence in the medium term compared with a control group without HAGL lesions who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair alone.
肩盂撕脱性盂肱上韧带(HAGL)损伤常被漏诊,但已有研究表明其在肩关节前向不稳定患者中的发生率高达 10%。
比较 HAGL 损伤患者行开放式稳定术与配对对照组行单纯关节镜 Bankart 修复术的临床结果和复发率。
队列研究;证据等级,3 级。
对所有接受关节镜和开放式稳定术治疗、随访时间至少 24 个月的患者进行回顾性分析。HAGL 损伤患者按年龄、性别、运动类型、术前运动水平和随访时间以 1:6 的比例与单纯行关节镜 Bankart 修复术的无 HAGL 损伤患者进行配对。评估患者重返运动(RTP)、返回水平和返回时间。此外,比较两组的复发率、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、主观肩部值(SSV)、Rowe 评分、满意度以及是否会再次接受相同的手术。
共纳入 15 例 HAGL 损伤患者,平均年龄为 21.5 ± 4.1 岁,平均随访 53.5 ± 17.4 个月,与 90 例无 HAGL 损伤患者配对。总体而言,两组间的各项临床结果评分(VAS、Rowe、SSV、满意度)差异均无统计学意义(1.6 比 1.7, =.86;83.4 比 88.0, =.06;85.7 比 87.2, =.76;86.7%比 94.5%, =.26)。此外,两组间 RTP 的总体发生率、水平和时间也无显著差异(93.3%比 90.0%, >.99;80.0%比 78.9%, >.99;5.3 ± 2.2 比 5.9 ± 2.9 个月, =.45)。HAGL 组与配对对照组的恐惧、半脱位和复发性不稳定的发生率也无显著差异(26.7%比 26.7%, >.99;6.7%比 3.3%, =.47;13.3%比 6.7%, =.32)。
与单纯行关节镜 Bankart 修复术的对照组相比,行开放式 HAGL 修复术的肩关节前向不稳定患者具有良好的功能结果和较高的 RTP 率,中期复发率较低。