U.S. Geological Survey - Great Lakes Science Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Ecol Appl. 2022 Jun;32(4):e2565. doi: 10.1002/eap.2565. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
Plant-soil feedbacks (PSFs) mediate plant community dynamics and may plausibly facilitate plant invasions. Microbially mediated PSFs are defined by plant effects on soil microbes and subsequent changes in plant performance (responses), both positive and negative. For microbial interactions to benefit invasive plants disproportionately, native and invasive plants must either (1) have different effects on and responses to soil microbial communities or (2) only respond differently to similar microbial communities. In other words, invasive plants do not need to cultivate different microbial communities than natives if they respond differently to them. However, effects and responses are not often explored separately, making it difficult to determine the underlying causes of performance differences. We performed a reciprocal-transplant PSF experiment with multiple microbial inhibition treatments to determine how native and non-native lineages of Phragmites australis affect and respond to soil bacteria, fungi, and oomycetes. Non-native Phragmites is a large, fast-growing, cosmopolitan invasive plant, whereas the North American native variety is comparatively smaller, slower growing, and typically considered a desirable wetland plant. We identified the effects of each plant lineage on soil microbes using DNA meta-barcoding and linked plant responses to microbial communities. Both Phragmites lineages displayed equally weak, insignificant PSFs. We found evidence of slight differential effects on microbial community composition, but no significant differential plant responses. Soils conditioned by each lineage differed only slightly in bacterial community composition, but not in fungal composition. Additionally, native and non-native Phragmites lineages did not significantly differ in their response to similar soil microbial communities. Neither lineage appreciably differed when plant biomass was compared between those grown in sterile and live soils. Targeted microbial inhibitor treatments revealed both lineages were negatively impacted by soil bacteria, but the negative response was stronger in non-native Phragmites. These observations were opposite of expectations from invasion theory and imply that the success of non-native Phragmites, relative to the native lineage, does not result from its interaction with soil microorganisms. More broadly, quantifying plant effects on, and responses to soil microbes separately provides detailed and nuanced insight into plant-microbial interactions and their role in invasions, which could inform management outcomes for invasive plants.
植物-土壤反馈(PSFs)调节植物群落动态,并且可能有助于植物入侵。微生物介导的 PSFs 是由植物对土壤微生物的影响以及随后植物性能的变化(响应)定义的,包括正向和负向。为了使微生物相互作用有利于入侵植物不成比例地受益,本地和入侵植物必须(1)对土壤微生物群落具有不同的影响和响应,或者(2)仅对类似的微生物群落做出不同的响应。换句话说,如果入侵植物对它们的反应不同,它们就不需要培养与本地植物不同的微生物群落。然而,影响和响应通常不是单独探索的,这使得难以确定性能差异的根本原因。我们进行了一个具有多个微生物抑制处理的互惠移植 PSF 实验,以确定澳大利亚芦苇的本地和非本地谱系如何影响和响应土壤细菌、真菌和卵菌。非本地的芦苇是一种大型、快速生长、世界性的入侵植物,而北美的本地品种则相对较小、生长缓慢,通常被认为是一种理想的湿地植物。我们使用 DNA 元条形码来确定每个植物谱系对土壤微生物的影响,并将植物的响应与微生物群落联系起来。两个芦苇谱系都显示出同样微弱、不显著的 PSFs。我们发现了对微生物群落组成的轻微差异影响的证据,但没有显著的差异植物响应。由每个谱系调节的土壤在细菌群落组成上略有不同,但真菌组成上没有差异。此外,本地和非本地芦苇谱系在对相似土壤微生物群落的响应方面没有显著差异。当比较在无菌和活体土壤中生长的植物生物量时,两个谱系都没有明显差异。针对目标微生物抑制剂的处理表明,两个谱系都受到土壤细菌的负面影响,但非本地芦苇的负面反应更强。这些观察结果与入侵理论的预期相反,这意味着非本地芦苇的成功,相对于本地谱系,并不是由于它与土壤微生物的相互作用。更广泛地说,分别量化植物对土壤微生物的影响和响应提供了对植物-微生物相互作用及其在入侵中的作用的详细和细致入微的洞察,这可以为入侵植物的管理结果提供信息。