Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit Medicine B, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco.
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cochin-Hôtel Dieu, University Hospitals of Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.
Dig Endosc. 2022 Sep;34(6):1224-1233. doi: 10.1111/den.14259. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
Biliary brushings and biopsies obtained during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) have a low sensitivity for the diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures. While cholangioscopic analysis is useful, visual criteria have not yet been defined. The aim of this study was to identify visual criteria for the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures (IDBS).
A multicenter study was conducted based on the analysis of cholangioscopic recordings of IBDS. Diagnostic criteria were identified in a study group and verified in a validation group.
Four criteria were identified to be associated with malignancy, one negatively ("endobiliary material," odds ratio [OR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.92) and three positively ("vascularized villous projections," OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.03-2.24; "twisted or dilated vessels," OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.47-3.24; and "dark color of the mucosa," OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.23-2.70). Between two playbacks, the mean (95% CI) sensitivity of the observer's visual diagnosis increased from 66.1% (60-72) to 73.8% (69-78) (P = 0.004); in the second playback, the kappa value for interobserver agreement ranged between 0.36 (color) and 0.56 (endobiliary material), with a significant improvement (P = 0.0031-0.0001) between the first and second playbacks. Blind assessment by endoscopists not involved in this study had a diagnostic accuracy of 73% (71.4-74.5).
The four identified cholangioscopic features are easy to implement in clinical practice and have the potential to increase the level of diagnostic confidence during the workup of IDBS.
内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)时获得的胆道刷检和活检对恶性胆道狭窄的诊断敏感性较低。虽然胆管镜检查分析很有用,但尚未定义视觉标准。本研究旨在确定诊断不确定的胆道狭窄(IDBS)的视觉标准。
基于 IDBS 的胆管镜检查记录进行多中心研究。在研究组中确定诊断标准,并在验证组中进行验证。
确定了四个与恶性肿瘤相关的标准,一个为负向标准(“胆管内物质”,优势比[OR]0.62,95%置信区间[CI]0.41-0.92),三个为正向标准(“血管化绒毛状突起”,OR1.52,95%CI1.03-2.24;“扭曲或扩张的血管”,OR2.18,95%CI1.47-3.24;和“黏膜颜色较暗”,OR1.82,95%CI1.23-2.70)。在两次回放之间,观察者视觉诊断的平均(95%CI)敏感性从 66.1%(60-72)增加到 73.8%(69-78)(P=0.004);在第二次回放中,观察者间一致性的kappa 值在 0.36(颜色)和 0.56(胆管内物质)之间,第一次和第二次回放之间有显著改善(P=0.0031-0.0001)。未参与本研究的内镜医生进行盲法评估的诊断准确率为 73%(71.4-74.5)。
确定的四个胆管镜特征易于在临床实践中实施,并有潜力提高 IDBS 检查过程中的诊断信心水平。