Suppr超能文献

埃塞俄比亚西北部蛇伤患者的治疗结果-回顾性分析。

Treatment outcomes among snakebite patients in north-west Ethiopia-A retrospective analysis.

机构信息

Médecins Sans Frontières, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022 Feb 9;16(2):e0010148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010148. eCollection 2022 Feb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Millions of people are bitten by venomous snakes annually, causing high mortality and disability, but the true burden of this neglected health issue remains unknown. Since 2015, Médecins Sans Frontières has been treating snakebite patients in a field hospital in north-west Ethiopia. Due to the poor market situation for effective and safe antivenoms for Sub-Saharan Africa, preferred antivenom was not always available, forcing changes in choice of antivenom used. This study describes treatment outcomes and the effectiveness and safety of different antivenoms used.

METHODOLOGY / PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: This retrospective observational study included 781 snakebite patients presenting at the field hospital between 2015 and 2019. Adjusted odds ratios, 95%-CI and p-values were used to compare the treatment outcome of patients treated with Fav-Afrique (n = 149), VacSera (n = 164), and EchiTAb-PLUS-ICP (n = 156) antivenom, and to identify the risk of adverse reactions for each antivenom. Whereas only incidental snakebite cases presented before 2015, after treatment was made available, cases rapidly increased to 1,431 in 2019. Envenomation was mainly attributed to North East African saw-scaled viper (Echis pyramidum) and puff adder (Bitis arietans). Patients treated with VacSera antivenom showed lower chance of uncomplicated treatment outcome (74.4%) compared to Fav-Afrique (93.2%) and EchiTAb-PLUS-ICP (90.4%). VacSera and EchiTAb-PLUS-ICP were associated with 16- and 6-fold adjusted odds of treatment reaction compared to Fav-Afrique, respectively, and VacSera was weakly associated with higher odds of death.

CONCLUSIONS / SIGNIFICANCE: Snakebite frequency is grossly underreported unless treatment options are available. Although EchiTAb-PLUS-ICP showed favorable outcomes in this retrospective analysis, prospective randomized trials are needed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the most promising antivenoms for Sub-Saharan Africa. Structural investment in sustained production and supply of antivenom is urgently needed.

摘要

背景

每年有数百万人被毒蛇咬伤,导致高死亡率和残疾,但这一被忽视的健康问题的真正负担仍不清楚。自 2015 年以来,无国界医生组织一直在埃塞俄比亚西北部的一个野战医院治疗被蛇咬伤的患者。由于撒哈拉以南非洲地区有效和安全的抗蛇毒血清市场状况不佳,并非总是有首选的抗蛇毒血清可用,因此被迫改变了使用的抗蛇毒血清的选择。本研究描述了治疗结果以及使用的不同抗蛇毒血清的有效性和安全性。

方法/主要发现:这是一项回顾性观察性研究,纳入了 2015 年至 2019 年期间在野战医院就诊的 781 名蛇咬伤患者。使用调整后的优势比、95%置信区间和 P 值比较了使用 Fav-Afrique(n = 149)、VacSera(n = 164)和 EchiTAb-PLUS-ICP(n = 156)抗蛇毒血清治疗的患者的治疗结果,并确定了每种抗蛇毒血清发生不良反应的风险。虽然 2015 年前只有偶然的蛇咬伤病例,但在提供治疗后,2019 年病例迅速增加到 1431 例。中毒主要归因于东北非洲锯鳞蛇(Echis pyramidum)和膨蝰(Bitis arietans)。与 Fav-Afrique(93.2%)和 EchiTAb-PLUS-ICP(90.4%)相比,使用 VacSera 抗蛇毒血清治疗的患者出现无并发症治疗结果的几率较低(74.4%)。与 Fav-Afrique 相比,VacSera 和 EchiTAb-PLUS-ICP 分别与治疗反应的调整后优势比为 16 倍和 6 倍,而 VacSera 与死亡风险增加呈弱相关。

结论/意义:除非提供治疗选择,否则蛇咬伤的频率严重被低估。虽然在本回顾性分析中 EchiTAb-PLUS-ICP 显示出良好的结果,但仍需要前瞻性随机试验来评估最有前途的撒哈拉以南非洲抗蛇毒血清的有效性和安全性。迫切需要对抗蛇毒血清的持续生产和供应进行结构性投资。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4753/8863263/c35719ece5c9/pntd.0010148.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验