National Poisons Information Service - Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Myanmar Oxford Clinical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2021 Nov;59(11):992-1001. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2021.1891245. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
Bites by the European adder () in the UK are uncommon but potentially life threatening, and can be associated with marked limb swelling and disability. Following an interruption in Zagreb Imunološki zavod antivenom supply around 2012, the UK changed its national choice of antivenom for to ViperaTAb, an ovine Fab monospecific antivenom. In the absence of randomised controlled trials, we established an audit to review its use in clinical practice.
A prospective audit of ViperaTAb use was conducted from March 2016 until November 2020 by the UK National Poison Information Service (NPIS). Users of the NPIS online toxicology database, TOXBASE, considering the use of antivenom for envenoming were invited to discuss the case with the on-call clinical toxicology consultant. Information was collected prospectively on indications, administration, adverse reactions and outcome of patients administered ViperaTAb antivenom.
One hundred and seventy patients were administered ViperaTAb antivenom over five years. One hundred and thirty-two were adults and 38 children (median age and range: 38, 2-87 years). Bites occurred across the UK, but most commonly in coastal regions of Wales and of South-West and East England. Median time to presentation was 2.1 (IQR 1.5-4.0) h and to antivenom administration from presentation was 2.0 (IQR 0.9-3.6) h. A minority of patients presented to hospital more than 12 h after being bitten ( = 19, 11.2%) or received antivenom more than 12 h after presenting to hospital ( = 17, 10.0%). Features of systemic envenoming were present in 64/170 (37.6%) patients, including 23 (13.5%) with anaphylaxis and 26 (15.3%) with hypotension (nine with both). Clinician assessment considered the initial antivenom to have been effective in 122/169 (72.2%) patients. Repeated dosing was common, occurring in 55/169 (32.5%), predominantly due to persisting or worsening local effects (46/51, 90.2%). There were three cases of probable early adverse reaction. No deaths occurred during the study. Complications of envenoming were rare but included four patients that underwent surgery, three patients each with acute kidney injury, mild coagulopathy, or thrombocytopenia (one severe). The median duration of hospital stay was 43.7 (IQR 22.5-66.5) h, longer for children than adults (52.5 vs 41.3 h).
ViperaTAb antivenom appears to be effective and safe and should be administered as soon as possible for patients meeting clinical criteria. Patients require close observation following antivenom to detect adverse reactions and progression or recurrence of envenoming. Close collaboration with expert NPIS consultant advice can help optimise antivenom timing, ensure repeated dosing is given appropriately, and avoid unnecessary surgical intervention. All hospitals, particularly those located in areas of relatively high incidence, should stock sufficient antivenom available at short notice, 24 h a day.
在英国,欧洲蝰蛇()咬伤并不常见,但可能危及生命,并可能伴有明显的肢体肿胀和残疾。2012 年左右,萨格勒布免疫研究所抗蛇毒血清供应中断后,英国改变了治疗蝰蛇咬伤的抗蛇毒血清的国家选择,改为使用 ViperaTAb,一种羊源 Fab 单特异性抗蛇毒血清。由于缺乏随机对照试验,我们建立了一项审计,以审查其在临床实践中的使用情况。
英国国家毒物信息服务处(NPIS)于 2016 年 3 月至 2020 年 11 月对 ViperaTAb 的使用情况进行了前瞻性审计。NPIS 在线毒理学数据库 TOXBASE 的用户,如果考虑使用抗蛇毒血清治疗蝰蛇咬伤,将被邀请与值班临床毒理学顾问讨论该病例。前瞻性收集了患者使用 ViperaTAb 抗蛇毒血清的指征、给药、不良反应和结果。
五年间,共有 170 名患者使用了 ViperaTAb 抗蛇毒血清。132 名成年患者,38 名儿童(中位年龄和范围:38,2-87 岁)。咬伤发生在英国各地,但最常见于威尔士沿海地区以及英格兰西南部和东部。中位就诊时间为 2.1(IQR 1.5-4.0)h,从就诊到使用抗蛇毒血清的时间为 2.0(IQR 0.9-3.6)h。少数患者在被咬伤后 12 小时以上就诊( = 19,11.2%)或在就诊后 12 小时以上接受抗蛇毒血清治疗( = 17,10.0%)。170 名患者中有 64/170(37.6%)出现全身中毒表现,其中 23 例(13.5%)出现过敏反应,26 例(15.3%)出现低血压(9 例同时出现)。临床医生评估认为 122/169(72.2%)名患者的初始抗蛇毒血清有效。重复给药很常见,55/169(32.5%)名患者发生重复给药,主要是由于局部效应持续或恶化(46/51,90.2%)。有 3 例可能为早期不良反应。研究期间无死亡病例。中毒并发症罕见,但包括 4 例患者接受手术,3 例患者分别出现急性肾损伤、轻度凝血障碍或血小板减少症(1 例严重)。中位住院时间为 43.7(IQR 22.5-66.5)h,儿童比成人长(52.5 比 41.3 h)。
ViperaTAb 抗蛇毒血清似乎是有效和安全的,应尽快为符合临床标准的患者使用。患者在使用抗蛇毒血清后需要密切观察,以发现不良反应和中毒的进展或复发。与专家 NPIS 顾问的密切合作可以帮助优化抗蛇毒血清的时机,确保适当重复给药,并避免不必要的手术干预。所有医院,特别是那些位于相对高发地区的医院,应随时储备足够的抗蛇毒血清,24 小时供应。