Zulueta Egea Mar, Prieto-Ursúa María, Bermejo Toro Laura, Jodar Anchía Rafa
Nursing, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud San Rafael-Nebrija, Madrid, Spain.
Psychology Department and Clinical Unit of Psychology (UNINPSI), Comillas Pontifical University - Cantoblanco Campus, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain.
Palliat Support Care. 2023 Apr;21(2):205-213. doi: 10.1017/S1478951521001954.
There is increasing concern regarding the quality of palliative nursing care. However, despite the growing number of studies identifying related variables, there is still a paucity of studies analyzing models of how these variables interrelate.
The study aimed to identify the role played in the quality of palliative care of nursing professionals by the variables meaning and death anxiety and to investigate the mediating role of psychological well-being and engagement.
176 palliative nursing professionals participated, selected by non-probabilistic convenience sampling using the snowball method. A simple mediation analysis and a multiple mediator model were performed in parallel, and data were collected using a paper and online questionnaire between January and May 2018.
Well-being mediated the impact of meaning (indirect effect = 0.096, SE = 0.044, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.028, 0.213) and death anxiety (indirect effect = -0.032, SE = 0.013, 95% CI: -0.064, -0.010) on the quality of care. Engagement, on the other hand, only mediated the impact of meaning (indirect effect = 0.185, SE = 0.085, 95% CI: 0.035, 0.372), while the indirect effect of death anxiety with the quality of care through engagement was not statistically significant (indirect effect = 0.008, SE = 0.009, 95% CI: -0.004, 0.032).
Death anxiety is not directly related to the quality of care, but rather has an effect through psychological well-being, a variable acting as a mediator between the two. The effect of meaning on the quality of care is explained by the mediation of both engagement and psychological well-being, and its impact on the quality of care is thereby mediated by more variables than death anxiety.
人们对姑息护理质量的关注度日益提高。然而,尽管越来越多的研究确定了相关变量,但分析这些变量如何相互关联的模型的研究仍然很少。
本研究旨在确定意义和死亡焦虑变量在姑息护理质量中对护理专业人员所起的作用,并调查心理健康和敬业度的中介作用。
采用雪球法进行非概率便利抽样,选取了176名姑息护理专业人员。同时进行了简单中介分析和多重中介模型分析,并于2018年1月至5月使用纸质问卷和在线问卷收集数据。
幸福感在意义(间接效应=0.096,标准误=0.044,95%置信区间(CI):0.028,0.213)和死亡焦虑(间接效应=-0.032,标准误=0.013,95%CI:-0.064,-0.010)对护理质量的影响中起中介作用。另一方面,敬业度仅在意义对护理质量的影响中起中介作用(间接效应=0.185,标准误=0.085,95%CI:0.035,0.372),而死亡焦虑通过敬业度对护理质量的间接效应无统计学意义(间接效应=0.008,标准误=0.009,95%CI:-0.004,0.032)。
死亡焦虑与护理质量无直接关系,而是通过幸福感产生影响,幸福感是二者之间的中介变量。意义对护理质量的影响通过敬业度和幸福感的中介作用来解释,因此其对护理质量的影响由比死亡焦虑更多的变量介导。