Department for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland; Department for Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Carl Gustav Carus Dresden University Hospital, Technical University, Dresden.
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2022 Apr 22;119(16):279-284. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0099.
The utility of routine x-rays after the osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures and ankle fractures is questionable. We performed a trial to determine whether such x-rays are justified in patients who have undergone standardized imaging with C-arm fluoroscopy during surgery.
Patients requiring surgery for a distal radius fracture or an ankle fracture were candidates for inclusion in this prospective, randomized, controlled, non-blinded trial. Standardized intraoperative images were obtained with C-arm fluoroscopy and stored at the end of the operation. The next day, patients in the control group underwent imaging with a standard postoperative x-ray, while those in the intervention group did not. The primary endpoint was a change in the treatment plan, defined as additional imaging or a second operation. The secondary endpoints included the range of motion, pain as rated on the Visual Analog Scale, and a functional outcome analysis (PRWE/FAOS).
316 patients were included in the trial (163 in the control group, 153 in the intervention group), of whom 202 (64%) had radius fractures and 114 (36%) had ankle fractures. The treatment plan changed in twelve patients (3.8%; four in the control group and eight in the intervention group), seven of whom (2.2%; three in the control group and four in the intervention group) underwent a second operation. The frequency of changes in the treatment plan and of reoperations was comparable in the two groups (p = 0.36). On follow-up at six weeks and one year, the results with respect to functional outcomes and pain were comparable.
In this trial, routine postoperative x-rays after the osteosynthesis of distal radial fractures and ankle fractures did not improve the care of patients who had undergone standardized intraoperative imaging.
桡骨远端骨折和踝关节骨折内固定术后常规 X 射线的作用尚存在争议。我们进行了一项试验,旨在确定在术中接受 C 臂透视标准化成像的患者中,是否有必要进行此类 X 射线检查。
需要手术治疗桡骨远端骨折或踝关节骨折的患者符合本前瞻性、随机、对照、非盲法试验的入选标准。术中采用 C 臂透视进行标准化成像,并在手术结束时存储。次日,对照组患者接受标准术后 X 射线检查,而干预组患者则不进行。主要终点是治疗计划的改变,定义为额外的影像学检查或再次手术。次要终点包括活动范围、视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分和功能结局分析(PRWE/FAOS)。
316 例患者纳入试验(对照组 163 例,干预组 153 例),其中 202 例(64%)为桡骨骨折,114 例(36%)为踝关节骨折。12 例(3.8%)患者的治疗计划发生改变,其中 4 例(3.8%)在对照组,8 例(5.3%)在干预组。有 7 例(2.2%)患者进行了二次手术,其中 3 例(2.0%)在对照组,4 例(2.6%)在干预组。两组之间治疗计划改变和再次手术的频率无显著差异(p = 0.36)。在 6 周和 1 年的随访中,功能结局和疼痛方面的结果相似。
在这项试验中,桡骨远端骨折和踝关节骨折内固定术后常规行术后 X 射线检查并未改善接受标准化术中成像的患者的治疗效果。