Suppr超能文献

18至44岁女性对避孕植入剂的偏好。

Preference for Contraceptive Implant Among Women 18-44 years old.

作者信息

Matos Joana E, Balkaran Bridget L, Rooney Jillian, Crespi Simone

机构信息

Cerner Enviza, New York, New York, USA.

Organon, Jersey City, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2021 Dec 15;2(1):622-632. doi: 10.1089/whr.2021.0113. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

This study aimed to understand women's preferences regarding the subdermal contraceptive implant and to assess the proportion of women who would be underserved (with increased unintended pregnancies as the consequence) by not providing implant access equal to that of uterine-based long-acting reversible contraceptive methods (LARCs). A total of 1,200 women aged 18-44 years old (mean: 30.42 ± 7.67 years) participated in a U.S. cross-sectional online survey. To qualify for the study, women had to be sexually active with a male and not pregnant or trying to get pregnant at the time of the study. Women who had undergone a hysterectomy, a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, or a tubal ligation, and women with general infertility or those with a vasectomized partner were excluded. Descriptive analyses were conducted and weighted estimates, projecting to the total U.S. population were also provided. The majority of women (72.6%) reported that they would be willing to switch to a LARC, should it be readily available to them. Considering those women who already use an implant and those who would be willing to switch to it, 58% of women would be underserved by not being provided equal access to the subdermal implant. This reduced availability of this type of LARC may alone elevate the number of unintended pregnancies in the United States by ∼8% of all pregnancies per year. Thus, making all the available contraceptive methods and maintaining access to LARCs would help reduce unintended pregnancies and better serve women and their family planning needs.

摘要

本研究旨在了解女性对皮下避孕植入物的偏好,并评估因无法提供与子宫长效可逆避孕方法(LARC)同等的植入物获取机会而未得到充分服务的女性比例(后果是意外怀孕增加)。共有1200名年龄在18 - 44岁(平均:30.42 ± 7.67岁)的女性参与了一项美国横断面在线调查。为符合研究条件,女性必须与男性有性行为,且在研究时未怀孕或未试图怀孕。已接受子宫切除术、双侧输卵管卵巢切除术或输卵管结扎术的女性,以及患有一般性不孕症或伴侣已接受输精管切除术的女性被排除在外。进行了描述性分析,并提供了推算至美国总人口的加权估计值。大多数女性(72.6%)报告称,如果LARC对她们来说容易获得,她们愿意改用LARC。考虑到那些已经使用植入物的女性以及那些愿意改用植入物的女性,58%的女性因无法获得同等的皮下植入物获取机会而未得到充分服务。这种LARC类型的可及性降低可能仅在美国就会使每年意外怀孕的数量增加约占所有怀孕数的8%。因此,提供所有可用的避孕方法并维持对LARC的获取机会将有助于减少意外怀孕,并更好地满足女性及其计划生育需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fe8/8820401/3163434ba271/whr.2021.0113_figure1.jpg

相似文献

1
Preference for Contraceptive Implant Among Women 18-44 years old.
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2021 Dec 15;2(1):622-632. doi: 10.1089/whr.2021.0113. eCollection 2021.
2
Increasing long-acting reversible contraceptives: the Australian Contraceptive ChOice pRoject (ACCORd) cluster randomized trial.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4S):S921.e1-S921.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1267. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
3
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Nov;37(11):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30054-8.
4
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0.
7
Projections and opinions from 100 experts in long-acting reversible contraception.
Contraception. 2015 Dec;92(6):543-52. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.10.003. Epub 2015 Oct 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Contraceptive access and use of long-acting reversible contraceptives during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251351740. doi: 10.1177/17455057251351740. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
3
Same-day long-acting reversible contraceptive utilization after a statewide contraceptive access initiative.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Apr;228(4):451.e1-451.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.12.304. Epub 2022 Dec 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of contraception among reproductive-aged women in the United States, 2014 and 2016.
F S Rep. 2020 Jul 9;1(2):83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2020.06.006. eCollection 2020 Sep.
2
Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Specific Issues for Adolescents.
Pediatrics. 2020 Aug;146(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-007252. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
3
Familiarity and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception and contraceptive choice.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4S):S884.e1-S884.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1266. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
4
Implementing best practices for the provision of long-acting reversible contraception: a survey of obstetrician-gynecologists.
Contraception. 2019 Aug;100(2):123-127. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.03.053. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
5
Practice Bulletin No. 186: Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Implants and Intrauterine Devices.
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;130(5):e251-e269. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002400.
6
Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008-2011.
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 3;374(9):843-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1506575.
7
Effect of Removal of Planned Parenthood from the Texas Women's Health Program.
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 3;374(9):853-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1511902. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
8
Reductions in pregnancy rates in the USA with long-acting reversible contraception: a cluster randomised trial.
Lancet. 2015 Aug 8;386(9993):562-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62460-0. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
9
Preventing Unintended Pregnancy: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project in Review.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 May;24(5):349-53. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5191. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验