Management of Mandibular Subcondylar Fracture Through an Intraoral Approach Using a Trans-Buccal Trocar With Ramus Buccal Decortication.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to review retrospectively the functional recoveries of subcondylar fracture patients that underwent open reduction surgery using an extraoral approach or an intraoral approach using a trans-buccal trocar and involving ramus buccal decortication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of 47 patients with mandibular condyle fracture who visited Pusan National University Dental Hospital Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery between May 2015 and November 2020, 38 patients underwent open reduction and were classified according to the surgical method used. Preauricular, submandibular, and retro-mandibular approaches were all classified as extraoral approaches condyle fractures were classified as described by Spiessl and Schroll (1972). Distances between bone fragments on panorama radiographs before and after surgery were measured.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were included in this study, 9 patients received subcondylar fracture surgery. Open reduction surgery using an extraoral approach had a greater mean operation time than the intraoral approach using a trocar. Of the 17 patients treated with an intraoral approach, the average distance between bone fragments right after surgery was 1.27 ± 1.41mm, which was significantly greater than that of the extraoral approach (0.72 ± 0.35 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Favorable results can be obtained by mandibular condylar fracture surgery through an intraoral approach using a trans-buccal trocar with ramus buccal decortication. This technique minimizes scarring, secures accessibility using a trocar, and sufficiently secures the field of view through buccal cortical bone reduction.