Zhang Z Z, Kuang R F, Wei Z Y, Wang L Y, Su G Y, Ou Z H, Liang Q F
Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, School of Computer Science (National Pilot Software Engineering School), Beijing 100876, China.
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Feb 11;58(2):120-129. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20211110-00537.
To establish a method to record the spontaneous blink pattern with a machine learning model, and to clarify the spontaneous blink pattern in patients with dry eye. It was a cross-setional study.We selected 357 dry eye patients (102 males and 255 females), aged (46.2±13.3) years, who visited corneal specialist clinics of Beijing Tongren Eye Center in 2019, as the dry eye group. The control group enrolled 152 normal controls, including 32 males and 120 females, aged (48.1±13.9) years. All participants completed the Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire, blink video capture, lipid layer thickness measurement, tear break-up time measurement, corneal fluorescein staining, and Schirmer Ⅱ test. Based on the assembled model built using UNet image segmentation algorithm and ResNet image classification algorithm, single frames of the blink video were analyzed, and then the palpebral opening height of each frame was obtained in order to establish a spontaneous blink wave. Finally, the characteristics of spontaneous blinks in dry eye patients were analyzed based on different types of complete blinks (types A, B and C) and partial blinks (types Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ). Independent sample test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to judge if there was significant difference between the dry eye group and the normal group. The accuracy of the segmentation model and the classification model was 96.3% and 96.0%, respectively, and the consistency with the manual analysis was 97.9%. In dry eye patients, the number of blinks was 30 (18, 42)/min, which was higher than that in normal controls [20 (9, 46)/min] (18 132.50, =0.002). The number of complete blinks in dry eye cases was significantly lower than that in normal controls [6 (3, 24)/min 12 (3,33)/min; 12 361.00, =0.016], and the number of partial blinks was significantly higher than that in normal controls [15 (6, 27)/min 3 (0, 10)/min; 22 839.00, <0.001]. In complete blinks, the proportion of type A blinks in dry eye patients was significantly higher than that in normal controls [53.7% (2 796/5 177) 39.3% (633/1 698); χ²=101.83, <0.001]; in partial blinks, the proportion of type Ⅱ blinks in dry eye patients was significantly higher than that in normal controls [36.0%(2 334/6 477) 29.6%(126/426); χ²=6.99, =0.007]. The average interblink interval of dry eye patients was 1.2 s, which was not significantly different from that of normal controls (1.1 s; 15 230.00, =0.093). The eyelid closed phase of dry eye patients was 0.8 s, which was significantly shorter than that of normal controls (1.3 s; 16 291.50, =0.006). There were no significant differences in eyelid closing phase, early opening phase and late opening phase between the two groups (all >0.05). In dry eye patients, the number of partial blinks increased, the number of complete blinks decreased, and the duration of eyelid closed phase shortened significantly. The main blink patterns of dry eye patients included type Ⅱ partial blinks with a reduced closure amplitude and type A complete blinks with a shortened closure time.
建立一种使用机器学习模型记录自发眨眼模式的方法,并阐明干眼症患者的自发眨眼模式。这是一项横断面研究。我们选取了2019年就诊于北京同仁眼科中心角膜专科门诊的357例干眼症患者(男性102例,女性255例),年龄(46.2±13.3)岁,作为干眼组。对照组纳入152名正常对照者,包括男性32例,女性120例,年龄(48.1±13.9)岁。所有参与者均完成眼表疾病指数问卷、眨眼视频采集、脂质层厚度测量、泪膜破裂时间测量、角膜荧光素染色及SchirmerⅡ试验。基于使用UNet图像分割算法和ResNet图像分类算法构建的组合模型,对眨眼视频的单帧进行分析,进而获得每一帧的睑裂开口高度,以建立自发眨眼波形。最后,根据不同类型的完全眨眼(A、B和C型)和不完全眨眼(Ⅰ、Ⅱ和Ⅲ型)分析干眼症患者自发眨眼的特征。采用独立样本t检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验判断干眼组与正常组之间是否存在显著差异。分割模型和分类模型的准确率分别为96.3%和96.0%,与人工分析的一致性为97.9%。干眼症患者的眨眼次数为30(18,42)次/分钟,高于正常对照者[20(9,46)次/分钟](t=18.13250,P=0.002)。干眼症患者的完全眨眼次数显著低于正常对照者[6(3,24)次/分钟对12(3,33)次/分钟;Z=12.36100,P==0.016],不完全眨眼次数显著高于正常对照者[15(6,27)次/分钟对3(0,10)次/分钟;Z=22.83900,P<0.001]。在完全眨眼方面,干眼症患者中A型眨眼的比例显著高于正常对照者[53.7%(2796/5177)对39.3%(633/1698);χ²=101.83,P<0.001];在不完全眨眼方面,干眼症患者中Ⅱ型眨眼的比例显著高于正常对照者[36.0%(2334/6477)对29.6%(126/426);χ²=6.99,P=0.007]。干眼症患者的平均眨眼间隔为1.2秒,与正常对照者(1.1秒)无显著差异(t=15.23000,P=0.093)。干眼症患者眼睑闭合期为0.8秒,显著短于正常对照者(1.3秒)(Z=16.29150,P=0.006)。两组在眼睑闭合期、早期睁开期和晚期睁开期均无显著差异(均P>0.05)。在干眼症患者中,不完全眨眼次数增加,完全眨眼次数减少,眼睑闭合期持续时间显著缩短。干眼症患者的主要眨眼模式包括闭合幅度减小的Ⅱ型不完全眨眼和闭合时间缩短的A型完全眨眼。