• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[运用机器学习方法检测干眼患者的自发眨眼模式]

[Detection of the spontaneous blinking pattern of dry eye patients using the machine learning method].

作者信息

Zhang Z Z, Kuang R F, Wei Z Y, Wang L Y, Su G Y, Ou Z H, Liang Q F

机构信息

Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.

Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, School of Computer Science (National Pilot Software Engineering School), Beijing 100876, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Feb 11;58(2):120-129. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20211110-00537.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20211110-00537
PMID:35144352
Abstract

To establish a method to record the spontaneous blink pattern with a machine learning model, and to clarify the spontaneous blink pattern in patients with dry eye. It was a cross-setional study.We selected 357 dry eye patients (102 males and 255 females), aged (46.2±13.3) years, who visited corneal specialist clinics of Beijing Tongren Eye Center in 2019, as the dry eye group. The control group enrolled 152 normal controls, including 32 males and 120 females, aged (48.1±13.9) years. All participants completed the Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire, blink video capture, lipid layer thickness measurement, tear break-up time measurement, corneal fluorescein staining, and Schirmer Ⅱ test. Based on the assembled model built using UNet image segmentation algorithm and ResNet image classification algorithm, single frames of the blink video were analyzed, and then the palpebral opening height of each frame was obtained in order to establish a spontaneous blink wave. Finally, the characteristics of spontaneous blinks in dry eye patients were analyzed based on different types of complete blinks (types A, B and C) and partial blinks (types Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ). Independent sample test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to judge if there was significant difference between the dry eye group and the normal group. The accuracy of the segmentation model and the classification model was 96.3% and 96.0%, respectively, and the consistency with the manual analysis was 97.9%. In dry eye patients, the number of blinks was 30 (18, 42)/min, which was higher than that in normal controls [20 (9, 46)/min] (18 132.50, =0.002). The number of complete blinks in dry eye cases was significantly lower than that in normal controls [6 (3, 24)/min 12 (3,33)/min; 12 361.00, =0.016], and the number of partial blinks was significantly higher than that in normal controls [15 (6, 27)/min 3 (0, 10)/min; 22 839.00, <0.001]. In complete blinks, the proportion of type A blinks in dry eye patients was significantly higher than that in normal controls [53.7% (2 796/5 177) 39.3% (633/1 698); χ²=101.83, <0.001]; in partial blinks, the proportion of type Ⅱ blinks in dry eye patients was significantly higher than that in normal controls [36.0%(2 334/6 477) 29.6%(126/426); χ²=6.99, =0.007]. The average interblink interval of dry eye patients was 1.2 s, which was not significantly different from that of normal controls (1.1 s; 15 230.00, =0.093). The eyelid closed phase of dry eye patients was 0.8 s, which was significantly shorter than that of normal controls (1.3 s; 16 291.50, =0.006). There were no significant differences in eyelid closing phase, early opening phase and late opening phase between the two groups (all >0.05). In dry eye patients, the number of partial blinks increased, the number of complete blinks decreased, and the duration of eyelid closed phase shortened significantly. The main blink patterns of dry eye patients included type Ⅱ partial blinks with a reduced closure amplitude and type A complete blinks with a shortened closure time.

摘要

建立一种使用机器学习模型记录自发眨眼模式的方法,并阐明干眼症患者的自发眨眼模式。这是一项横断面研究。我们选取了2019年就诊于北京同仁眼科中心角膜专科门诊的357例干眼症患者(男性102例,女性255例),年龄(46.2±13.3)岁,作为干眼组。对照组纳入152名正常对照者,包括男性32例,女性120例,年龄(48.1±13.9)岁。所有参与者均完成眼表疾病指数问卷、眨眼视频采集、脂质层厚度测量、泪膜破裂时间测量、角膜荧光素染色及SchirmerⅡ试验。基于使用UNet图像分割算法和ResNet图像分类算法构建的组合模型,对眨眼视频的单帧进行分析,进而获得每一帧的睑裂开口高度,以建立自发眨眼波形。最后,根据不同类型的完全眨眼(A、B和C型)和不完全眨眼(Ⅰ、Ⅱ和Ⅲ型)分析干眼症患者自发眨眼的特征。采用独立样本t检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验判断干眼组与正常组之间是否存在显著差异。分割模型和分类模型的准确率分别为96.3%和96.0%,与人工分析的一致性为97.9%。干眼症患者的眨眼次数为30(18,42)次/分钟,高于正常对照者[20(9,46)次/分钟](t=18.13250,P=0.002)。干眼症患者的完全眨眼次数显著低于正常对照者[6(3,24)次/分钟对12(3,33)次/分钟;Z=12.36100,P==0.016],不完全眨眼次数显著高于正常对照者[15(6,27)次/分钟对3(0,10)次/分钟;Z=22.83900,P<0.001]。在完全眨眼方面,干眼症患者中A型眨眼的比例显著高于正常对照者[53.7%(2796/5177)对39.3%(633/1698);χ²=101.83,P<0.001];在不完全眨眼方面,干眼症患者中Ⅱ型眨眼的比例显著高于正常对照者[36.0%(2334/6477)对29.6%(126/426);χ²=6.99,P=0.007]。干眼症患者的平均眨眼间隔为1.2秒,与正常对照者(1.1秒)无显著差异(t=15.23000,P=0.093)。干眼症患者眼睑闭合期为0.8秒,显著短于正常对照者(1.3秒)(Z=16.29150,P=0.006)。两组在眼睑闭合期、早期睁开期和晚期睁开期均无显著差异(均P>0.05)。在干眼症患者中,不完全眨眼次数增加,完全眨眼次数减少,眼睑闭合期持续时间显著缩短。干眼症患者的主要眨眼模式包括闭合幅度减小的Ⅱ型不完全眨眼和闭合时间缩短的A型完全眨眼。

相似文献

1
[Detection of the spontaneous blinking pattern of dry eye patients using the machine learning method].[运用机器学习方法检测干眼患者的自发眨眼模式]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Feb 11;58(2):120-129. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20211110-00537.
2
Spontaneous Eye Blink Patterns in Dry Eye: Clinical Correlations.干眼的自发性瞬目模式:临床相关性。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Oct 1;59(12):5149-5156. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-24690.
3
Relationship Between Ocular Surface Epithelial Damage, Tear Abnormalities, and Blink in Patients With Dry Eye.干眼症患者眼表上皮损伤、泪液异常与眨眼之间的关系
Cornea. 2019 Mar;38(3):318-324. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001841.
4
Blinking and tear break-up during four visual tasks.四项视觉任务期间的眨眼和泪膜破裂情况。
Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Feb;86(2):E106-14. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318194e962.
5
Clinical Factors for Determining the Severity of Lid Wiper Epitheliopathy in Dry Eye.临床因素对评估干眼患者的睑板腺功能障碍严重程度的影响。
Cornea. 2022 May 1;41(5):545-551. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002879.
6
Blink patterns and kinematics of eyelid motion in ophthalmologically normal horses.眼科正常马匹的眨眼模式及眼睑运动的运动学
Am J Vet Res. 2018 Jun;79(6):650-657. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.79.6.650.
7
Evaluation of incomplete blinking as a measurement of dry eye disease.评估不完全眨眼作为干眼症的测量指标。
Ocul Surf. 2019 Jul;17(3):440-446. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 May 29.
8
Blink patterns and lid-contact times in dry-eye and normal subjects.干眼症患者与正常人的眨眼模式及眼睑接触时间
Clin Ophthalmol. 2014 May 5;8:869-74. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S56783. eCollection 2014.
9
Smartphone Use and Effects on Tear Film, Blinking and Binocular Vision.智能手机使用与泪膜、眨眼和双眼视觉的关系。
Curr Eye Res. 2020 Apr;45(4):428-434. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2019.1663542. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
10
Marked reduction and distinct patterns of eye blinking in patients with moderately dry eyes during video display terminal use.视频显示终端使用期间,中度干眼症患者眨眼明显减少且模式各异。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004 Apr;242(4):306-12. doi: 10.1007/s00417-003-0845-z. Epub 2004 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Corneal Diseases.人工智能在角膜疾病中的临床应用
Vision (Basel). 2025 Aug 18;9(3):71. doi: 10.3390/vision9030071.
2
Next-Generation Tear Meniscus Height Detecting and Measuring Smartphone-Based Deep Learning Algorithm Leads in Dry Eye Management.基于智能手机的深度学习算法的下一代泪液半月板高度检测与测量在干眼管理中处于领先地位。
Ophthalmol Sci. 2024 May 6;4(5):100546. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100546. eCollection 2024 Sep-Oct.
3
Advances in artificial intelligence applications for ocular surface diseases diagnosis.
人工智能在眼表疾病诊断中的应用进展。
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022 Dec 20;10:1107689. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.1107689. eCollection 2022.