Suppr超能文献

医疗保健专业人员在综合癌症中心对患者报告的结局测量(PROMs)的知识、使用和态度。

Knowledge, use and attitudes of healthcare professionals towards patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at a comprehensive cancer center.

机构信息

Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.

Information and Communication Technology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2022 Feb 10;22(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09269-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite evidence of the positive impact of routine assessment of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), their systematic collection is not widely implemented in cancer care.

AIM

To assess the knowledge, use and attitudes of healthcare professionals (HCPs) towards PROMs and electronically collected PROMs (ePROMs) in clinical practice and research and to explore respondent-related factors associated with the above dimensions.

METHOD

An ad hoc developed online survey was administered to all HCPs employed in clinical activity in an Italian comprehensive cancer center. The survey investigated which PROMs were known and used, as well as HCPs' opinions on the advantages and drawbacks of routine PROM assessment, including electronic assessment (ePROM). Linear and logistic regression models were used for association analyses.

RESULTS

Five Hundred Eleven of nine hundred ninety-two invited HCPs (52%) provided analyzable responses. 68% were women, 46% were nurses and 42% physicians, and 52.5% had > 20 years seniority. The average number of PROMs known was six among 17 proposed. All proved to be under-used (< 28%) except unidimensional and multidimensional pain scales (77 and 36%). Respondents expressed an overall positive attitude towards PROMs, with strengths outweighing weaknesses (mean overall scores 3.6 and 2.9, respectively, on a 1-5 scale). 67% of respondents preferred electronic collection over paper and pencil. Profession was associated with knowledge and use (physicians reported knowing more PROMs than other professionals) and with a preference for electronic collection (nurses were less likely to prefer the electronic format than physicians). Senior HCPs were slightly more critical about both PROMs and electronic administration.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey indicates an acceptable level of knowledge of common PROM tools but low usage in practice. Based on the generally positive attitude of HCPs, routine implementation of ePROMs can be promoted as long as adequate resources and training are provided.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not registered.

摘要

背景

尽管有证据表明常规评估患者报告结局测量(PROM)会产生积极影响,但在癌症护理中,并未广泛系统地收集这些数据。

目的

评估医护人员(HCP)对临床实践和研究中患者报告结局测量(PROM)和电子采集患者报告结局测量(ePROM)的知识、使用情况和态度,并探讨与上述方面相关的与受访者相关的因素。

方法

对在意大利综合癌症中心从事临床工作的所有 HCP 进行了专门开发的在线调查。该调查询问了他们了解和使用哪些 PROM,以及他们对常规 PROM 评估(包括电子评估)的优缺点的看法。使用线性和逻辑回归模型进行关联分析。

结果

在 992 名受邀的 HCP 中,有 511 名(52%)提供了可分析的回复。其中 68%为女性,46%为护士,42%为医生,52.5%的人有超过 20 年的工作经验。在提出的 17 种 PROM 中,有 6 种被认为是已知的。除了一维和多维疼痛量表(分别为 77%和 36%)外,所有量表的使用频率都较低(均<28%)。受访者对 PROM 总体持积极态度,优势大于劣势(1-5 分制下,总体评分分别为 3.6 和 2.9)。67%的受访者更喜欢电子采集而不是纸笔采集。职业与知识和使用情况相关(医生报告称他们比其他专业人员了解更多的 PROM),并且更倾向于电子采集(护士比医生更不可能喜欢电子格式)。资深的 HCP 对 PROM 和电子管理的看法稍显负面。

结论

这项调查表明,医护人员对常见 PROM 工具的了解程度尚可,但在实践中使用率较低。根据 HCP 普遍持有的积极态度,只要提供足够的资源和培训,就可以推广常规使用电子采集患者报告结局测量。

试验注册

未注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a97c/8832637/c4163e1bc625/12885_2022_9269_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验