Carayon Pascale, Thuemling Teresa, Parmasad Vishala, Bao Songtao, O'Horo John, Bennett Nicholas T, Safdar Nasia
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Wisconsin Institute for Healthcare Systems Engineering; University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Wisconsin Institute for Healthcare Systems Engineering; University of Wisconsin-Madison.
J Patient Saf Risk Manag. 2021 Jul;26(4):161-171. doi: 10.1177/25160435211025417. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
Antibiotic use is often the target of interventions in health care organizations that aim to decrease healthcare-associated infections (HAI) such as (CDI); this is particularly important for fluoroquinolones (FQ), which are frequently used in critical care settings. In this study, using a multiple case study research approach, we conduct an in-depth analysis of an intervention aimed at limiting ICU prescriber access to FQ in two ICUs of two hospitals. The data collection and analysis were guided by a human factors engineering approach based on the SEIPS (Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety) model and evidence-based implementation principles. Our results show some differences in the implementation of the FQ intervention between the two ICUs, such as level and method of FQ restriction, and training and communication with physicians and pharmacists. In both ICUs, several organizational learning mechanisms helped to quickly identify problems with the intervention and ensure that changes were made in a just-in-time manner (e.g. just-in-time training, removal of FQ in order set for pneumonia). Despite their organizational differences, both sites developed strategies to successfully implement the FQ intervention.
抗生素的使用往往是医疗机构干预措施的目标,这些干预旨在减少医疗相关感染(HAI),如艰难梭菌感染(CDI);这对于经常在重症监护环境中使用的氟喹诺酮类药物(FQ)尤为重要。在本研究中,我们采用多案例研究方法,对旨在限制两家医院的两个重症监护病房(ICU)的重症监护医生使用FQ的一项干预措施进行了深入分析。数据收集和分析以基于SEIPS(患者安全系统工程倡议)模型的人因工程方法和循证实施原则为指导。我们的结果显示,两个ICU在FQ干预措施的实施上存在一些差异,如FQ限制的程度和方法,以及与医生和药剂师的培训与沟通。在两个ICU中,几种组织学习机制有助于快速识别干预措施中的问题,并确保及时做出改变(如及时培训、从肺炎医嘱集中移除FQ)。尽管两个ICU存在组织差异,但两个地点都制定了成功实施FQ干预措施的策略。