Suppr超能文献

2017ACC/AHA 指南定义的高血压比 2018ESC/ESH 更能准确检测年轻人的早期血管老化。

Hypertension defined by the 2017 ACC/AHA guideline is more accurate than 2018 ESC/ESH for detecting early vascular aging in young adults.

机构信息

Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.

Departamento de Puericultura e Pediatria, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Feb 11;101(6):e28841. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028841.

Abstract

Determine the most accurate diagnostic criteria of arterial hypertension (AH) for detecting early vascular aging (EVA) defined by pulse wave velocity (PWV) higher than ≥9.2 m/s.Cross-sectional study of a birth cohort started in 1978/79. The following data were collected between April 6, 2016 and August 31, 2017 from 1775 participants: demographic, anthropometric, office blood pressure (BP) measurement, biochemical risk factors, and PWV. A subsample of 454 participants underwent 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring. The frequencies of AH, and BP phenotypes were calculated according to both guidelines. BP phenotypes (white-coat hypertension, masked hypertension (MHT), sustained hypertension (SH) and normotension) were correlated with risk factors and subclinical target organ damage after adjustment for confounders by multiple linear regression. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to determine the best BP threshold for detecting EVA.A higher frequency of AH (45.1 vs 18.5%), as well as of SH (40.7 vs 14.8%) and MHT (28.9 vs 25.8%) was identified using the 2017 ACC/AHA criteria comparing with 2018 ESC/ESH. EVA was associated with the higher-risk BP phenotypes (SH and MHT, P < .0001) in both criteria. There was a higher accuracy in diagnosing EVA, with the 2017 ACC/AHA criteria. Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curves showed office BP cutoff value (128/83 mm Hg) for EVA closer to the 2017 ACC/AHA threshold.The 2017 AHA/ACC guideline for the diagnosis of AH, and corresponding ambulatory BP monitoring values, is more accurate for discriminating young adults with EVA. Clinical application of PWV may help identify patients that could benefit from BP levels <130/80 mm Hg.

摘要

确定动脉高血压(AH)的最准确诊断标准,以检测脉搏波速度(PWV)高于≥9.2m/s 的早期血管老化(EVA)。这是一项始于 1978/79 年的出生队列的横断面研究。2016 年 4 月 6 日至 2017 年 8 月 31 日期间,从 1775 名参与者中收集了以下数据:人口统计学、人体测量学、诊室血压(BP)测量、生化危险因素和 PWV。454 名参与者的亚样本接受了 24 小时动态血压监测。根据两个指南计算了 AH 和 BP 表型的频率。在调整混杂因素后,通过多元线性回归分析 BP 表型(白大衣高血压、隐匿性高血压(MHT)、持续性高血压(SH)和正常血压)与危险因素和亚临床靶器官损害的相关性。构建受试者工作特征曲线,以确定检测 EVA 的最佳 BP 阈值。与 2018 ESC/ESH 相比,使用 2017 年 ACC/AHA 标准,AH(45.1%比 18.5%)、SH(40.7%比 14.8%)和 MHT(28.9%比 25.8%)的频率更高。EVA 与两种标准中的高危 BP 表型(SH 和 MHT,P<0.0001)相关。2017 年 ACC/AHA 标准在诊断 EVA 方面具有更高的准确性。受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,办公室 BP 截断值(128/83mmHg)更接近 2017 年 ACC/AHA 阈值。用于 AH 诊断的 2017 年 AHA/ACC 指南和相应的动态血压监测值,更能准确区分有 EVA 的年轻成年人。PWV 的临床应用可能有助于识别可能受益于血压水平<130/80mmHg 的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2fd/8830849/ee4b07aaf906/medi-101-e28841-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验