Pharmacy Service, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Swiss Med Wkly. 2022 Feb 4;152:w30124. doi: 10.4414/smw.2022.w30124. eCollection 2022 Jan 31.
The high off-label use of drugs in paediatric patients raises questions on the efficacy and safety when prescribing psychotropic drugs. In our studies, we aimed to characterise the use of psychotropic drugs in the paediatric service of a tertiary hospital and quantify the proportion of off-label prescriptions with respect to age, indication and dosage recommendations approved in Switzerland, France and the USA.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study (RCS) that included hospitalised patients from 1 December 2017, to 28 June 2018 with at least one PD prescription (n = 74) and a prospective cohort study (PCS) that included those hospitalised from 29 June 2018, to 30 November 2018 with at least one psychotropic drug prescription (n = 37). For both studies, we collected demographic, medical and medication data. Off-label prescriptions were identified by comparing the marketing authorisations published in the three selected countries.
The average age of RCS and PCS patients were 13 ± 3 years and 14 ± 2 years, respectively. Of the 168 and 86 psychotropic prescriptions collected in the RCS and PCS, respectively, 70% and 71% prescriptions were off-label based on Swiss marketing authorisations. These rates declined when compared with French marketing authorisations (61% and 67% prescriptions) and were significantly lower when compared with American marketing authorisations (56% and 51% prescriptions). Psychotropic drugs were often prescribed as needed in both studies (53% and 43% of prescriptions), with only half of the patients actually receiving one of these prescribed psychotropic drugs.
Our results showed a high proportion of off-label prescriptions of psychotropic drugs in a hospital setting. The off-label prescription rates according to Swiss marketing authorisations were the highest when compared with French and American marketing authorisations. Harmonisation of either international marketing authorisations or dosage recommendations at a national level could be a step forward to improved and evidence-based use of psychotropic drugs in children and adolescents.
儿科患者中精神药物的高超说明书使用引发了关于精神药物在处方时的疗效和安全性的问题。在我们的研究中,我们旨在描述三级医院儿科服务中精神药物的使用情况,并量化相对于瑞士、法国和美国批准的年龄、适应证和剂量建议的超说明书处方比例。
我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究(RCS),该研究纳入了 2017 年 12 月 1 日至 2018 年 6 月 28 日至少有一份 PD 处方的住院患者(n=74),以及一项前瞻性队列研究(PCS),该研究纳入了 2018 年 6 月 29 日至 2018 年 11 月 30 日至少有一份精神药物处方的住院患者(n=37)。对于这两项研究,我们收集了人口统计学、医学和药物数据。通过比较在三个选定国家发布的药品上市许可,确定了超说明书处方。
RCS 和 PCS 患者的平均年龄分别为 13±3 岁和 14±2 岁。在 RCS 和 PCS 中分别收集的 168 份和 86 份精神药物处方中,基于瑞士药品上市许可,70%和 71%的处方为超说明书。当与法国药品上市许可相比时,这些比例下降(61%和 67%的处方),并且当与美国药品上市许可相比时,显著下降(56%和 51%的处方)。在这两项研究中,精神药物通常按需开具(53%和 43%的处方),只有一半的患者实际接受了其中一种规定的精神药物。
我们的结果显示,在医院环境中精神药物的超说明书处方比例较高。与法国和美国药品上市许可相比,基于瑞士药品上市许可的超说明书处方率最高。国际药品上市许可的协调或国家层面剂量建议的协调可能是朝着改善和基于证据的儿童和青少年精神药物使用迈出的一步。