Clinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Clinic of Conservative and Preventive Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Acta Odontol Scand. 2022 Aug;80(6):465-469. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2022.2035816. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
To investigate the effect of toothbrush bristles end configuration on the abrasive dentine wear at different brushing forces.
One hundred and sixty bovine dentine samples were randomized into eight groups ( = 20). Groups (1 to 4) were brushed with tapered-end bristles at 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-N brushing forces, respectively. Groups (5 to 8) were brushed with round-end bristles with the same brushing forces. The brushing sequence was carried out using an abrasive slurry (RDA = 121) for 25 min. Profiles were recorded using a contact profilometer. Mean and standard deviation were calculated for the abrasive dentine wear in each group. Two-way ANOVA was used to locate any significance. The significance values were corrected after Tukey (α = 0.05).
Brushing with tapered-end bristles resulted in statistically significantly less abrasive dentine wear than round-end bristles regardless of the applied brushing force (1 N: 4.4 ± 1.5 vs. 7.7 ± 2.0 µm; 2 N: 7.7 ± 2.1 vs. 12.2 ± 2.7 µm; 3 N: 11.3 ± 2.6 vs. 19.4 ± 3.7 µm; 4 N: 11.2 ± 2.1 vs. 25.3 ± 4.8 µm). The interaction between bristle configuration and brushing force was statistically significantly ( < 0.001).
Tapered-end toothbrushes might be a safer choice for patients, especially when showing signs of non-carious cervical lesion. However, other toothbrush properties should also be considered.
研究不同刷牙力下牙刷刷毛末端形状对牙本质磨损的影响。
将 160 个牛牙本质样本随机分为 8 组( = 20)。第 1 至 4 组分别使用锥形刷毛在 1、2、3、4-N 的刷牙力下刷牙。第 5 至 8 组使用相同刷牙力的圆头刷毛刷牙。使用磨料浆(RDA = 121)进行 25 分钟的刷牙顺序。使用接触式轮廓仪记录轮廓。计算每组牙本质磨损的平均值和标准差。使用双向方差分析定位任何显著差异。在 Tukey 后(α = 0.05)校正显著值。
无论刷牙力如何,使用锥形刷毛刷牙导致的牙本质磨损明显少于使用圆头刷毛(1-N:4.4 ± 1.5 与 7.7 ± 2.0 µm;2-N:7.7 ± 2.1 与 12.2 ± 2.7 µm;3-N:11.3 ± 2.6 与 19.4 ± 3.7 µm;4-N:11.2 ± 2.1 与 25.3 ± 4.8 µm)。刷毛形状和刷牙力之间的相互作用具有统计学意义( < 0.001)。
对于有非龋性颈段缺损迹象的患者,锥形牙刷可能是更安全的选择。然而,还应考虑其他牙刷特性。