Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Central Library of the Health Science Center, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Acta Odontol Scand. 2022 Aug;80(6):441-456. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2022.2032329. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
Answer the question: What is the effectiveness of titanium tetrafluoride (TiF) when compared to other fluorides, placebo solution or a negative control to prevent or treat dental caries and tooth erosion?
This review is in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. and studies that used TiF over enamel or dentine were included. Electronic searches were conducted on MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, WOS, Cochrane Library, VLH, Clinical Trials and OpenGrey. Risk of bias (ROB) assessments used RoB2 and ROBINS-I for randomized and non-randomized controlled trials (RCTs and on-RCTs); Syrcle's ROB tool for animal studies; and a modified tool proposed by Hollanders for studies.
A total of 28 studies met the eligibility criteria. From these, 6 were in humans (3 RCT and 3 Non-RCT); 4 were in animals and 18 were For studies, all RCTs have some concerns related to ROB and all of the non-RCT studies were classified as with serious risk. One animal study had a low and three a high ROB. Regarding studies, seven had a low, ten had an average and only one had a high ROB. The certainty of the evidence (GRADE) ranged from moderate to very low.
Although most of the results suggest a positive effect of TiF4 on the prevention and treatment of caries and dental erosion, it is not possible to have definitive conclusions due to the high studies' methodological heterogeneity, and the low quality of evidence for most outcomes.
The protocol of this syste. atic review was registered in the OPEN SCIENCE FRAMEWORK database (osf.io/6dgs9) DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/KUZA7 on 6 August 2020.
回答以下问题:与其他氟化物、安慰剂溶液或阴性对照相比,四氟化钛(TiF)在预防或治疗龋齿和牙齿侵蚀方面的效果如何?
本综述符合 PRISMA 指南。纳入了使用 TiF 处理牙釉质或牙本质的 及 研究。电子检索 MEDLINE、Scopus、Embase、WOS、Cochrane 图书馆、VLH、临床试验和 OpenGrey。使用 RoB2 和 ROBINS-I 评估随机和非随机对照试验(RCT 和非 RCT)的偏倚风险(ROB);Syrcle 的 ROB 工具评估动物研究;以及 Hollanders 提出的改良工具评估 研究。
共有 28 项研究符合入选标准。其中 6 项为人类研究(3 项 RCT 和 3 项非 RCT);4 项为动物研究;18 项为 研究。对于 研究,所有 RCT 都存在与 ROB 相关的一些问题,所有非 RCT 研究都被归类为严重风险。一项动物研究的 ROB 较低,三项动物研究的 ROB 较高。对于 研究,有 7 项研究的 ROB 较低,10 项研究的 ROB 中等,仅有 1 项研究的 ROB 较高。证据的确定性(GRADE)范围从中等到极低。
尽管大多数结果表明 TiF4 对预防和治疗龋齿和牙齿侵蚀有积极作用,但由于研究方法学的高度异质性以及大多数结局的证据质量较低,无法得出明确的结论。
本系统评价的方案于 2020 年 8 月 6 日在 OPEN SCIENCE FRAMEWORK 数据库(osf.io/6dgs9)上进行了注册(DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/KUZA7)。