Miller Alexandra M, Szalontay Luca, Bouvier Nancy, Hill Katherine, Ahmad Hamza, Rafailov Johnathan, Lee Alex J, Rodriguez-Sanchez M Irene, Yildirim Onur, Patel Arti, Bale Tejus A, Benhamida Jamal K, Benayed Ryma, Arcila Maria E, Donzelli Maria, Dunkel Ira J, Gilheeney Stephen W, Khakoo Yasmin, Kramer Kim, Sait Sameer F, Greenfield Jeffrey P, Souweidane Mark M, Haque Sofia, Mauguen Audrey, Berger Michael F, Mellinghoff Ingo K, Karajannis Matthias A
Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Neuro Oncol. 2022 Oct 3;24(10):1763-1772. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noac035.
Safe sampling of central nervous system tumor tissue for diagnostic purposes may be difficult if not impossible, especially in pediatric patients, and an unmet need exists to develop less invasive diagnostic tests.
We report our clinical experience with minimally invasive molecular diagnostics using a clinically validated assay for sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cell-free DNA (cfDNA). All CSF samples were collected as part of clinical care, and results reported to both clinicians and patients/families.
We analyzed 64 CSF samples from 45 pediatric, adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients (pediatric = 25; AYA = 20) with primary and recurrent brain tumors across 12 histopathological subtypes including high-grade glioma (n = 10), medulloblastoma (n = 10), pineoblastoma (n = 5), low-grade glioma (n = 4), diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumor (DLGNT) (n = 4), retinoblastoma (n = 4), ependymoma (n = 3), and other (n = 5). Somatic alterations were detected in 30/64 samples (46.9%) and in at least one sample per unique patient in 21/45 patients (46.6%). CSF cfDNA positivity was strongly associated with the presence of disseminated disease at the time of collection (81.5% of samples from patients with disseminated disease were positive). No association was seen between CSF cfDNA positivity and the timing of CSF collection during the patient's disease course.
We identified three general categories where CSF cfDNA testing provided additional relevant diagnostic, prognostic, and/or therapeutic information, impacting clinical assessment and decision making: (1) diagnosis and/or identification of actionable alterations; (2) monitor response to therapy; and (3) tracking tumor evolution. Our findings support broader implementation of clinical CSF cfDNA testing in this population to improve care.
出于诊断目的,对中枢神经系统肿瘤组织进行安全采样可能困难重重甚至无法实现,尤其是在儿科患者中,因此迫切需要开发侵入性较小的诊断测试。
我们报告了使用经过临床验证的脑脊液(CSF)游离DNA(cfDNA)测序检测方法进行微创分子诊断的临床经验。所有脑脊液样本均作为临床护理的一部分进行采集,并将结果报告给临床医生和患者/家属。
我们分析了45例儿科、青少年和青年成人(AYA)患者(儿科=25例;AYA=20例)的64份脑脊液样本,这些患者患有原发性和复发性脑肿瘤,涉及12种组织病理学亚型,包括高级别胶质瘤(n=10)、髓母细胞瘤(n=10)、松果体母细胞瘤(n=5)、低级别胶质瘤(n=4)、弥漫性软脑膜神经胶质瘤(DLGNT)(n=4)、视网膜母细胞瘤(n=4)、室管膜瘤(n=3)和其他(n=5)。在30/64份样本(46.9%)中检测到体细胞改变,在21/45例患者(46.6%)的至少一份样本中检测到体细胞改变。脑脊液cfDNA阳性与采集时播散性疾病的存在密切相关(81.5%的播散性疾病患者样本呈阳性)。在患者病程中,脑脊液cfDNA阳性与脑脊液采集时间之间未发现关联。
我们确定了脑脊液cfDNA检测可提供额外相关诊断、预后和/或治疗信息,从而影响临床评估和决策的三个一般类别:(1)诊断和/或识别可操作的改变;(2)监测治疗反应;(3)追踪肿瘤演变。我们的研究结果支持在这一人群中更广泛地开展临床脑脊液cfDNA检测,以改善治疗。