不同消毒方案对计算机辅助设计与制造(CAD-CAM)义齿基托材料表面性能的影响。

Effect of different disinfection protocols on the surface properties of CAD-CAM denture base materials.

作者信息

Atalay Sevda, Çakmak Gülce, Fonseca Manrique, Schimmel Martin, Yilmaz Burak

机构信息

Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Istanbul Okan University, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey.

Buser Foundation Scholar for Implant Dentistry, Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Nov;130(5):787-795. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.12.007. Epub 2022 Feb 9.

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Which disinfection protocol provides optimal water contact angle and microhardness for computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) materials is unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of different disinfection protocols (1% sodium hypochlorite, denture cleanser gel, and effervescent tablet) on the water contact angle and microhardness of different CAD-CAM PMMA denture base materials by comparing them with a heat-polymerized PMMA.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Disk-shaped specimens (Ø10×2 mm) were fabricated from 3 different CAD-CAM PMMAs-AvaDent (AV), Merz M-PM (M-PM), and Polident (Poli)-and a heat-polymerized PMMA (Vynacron) (CV) (n=21). Three disinfection protocols (1% sodium hypochlorite [HC], denture cleanser gel [GEL], an effervescent tablet [TAB]) were applied to simulate 180 days of cleansing. The water contact angle and microhardness of specimens were measured before and after disinfection and compared by using a 2-way ANOVA (α=.05).

RESULTS

For water contact angle, material (P=.010) and disinfection protocol (P=.002) had a significant effect. The material (P<.001), disinfection protocol (P=.001), and their interaction (P<.001) significantly affected the microhardness after disinfection. When the condition after disinfection was compared with that before disinfection, the water contact angle increased significantly in all material-disinfection protocol pairs (P≤.025), and microhardness increased significantly in all material-disinfection protocol pairs (P≤.040), except for GEL- (P=.689) or TAB-applied (P=.307) AV, HC-applied M-PM (P=.219), and TAB-applied Poli (P=.159).

CONCLUSIONS

The material and disinfection protocol affected the water contact angle of all tested PMMAs after disinfection, resulting in more hydrophobic surfaces for heat-polymerized or CAD-CAM PMMAs. The microhardness of heat-polymerized PMMA was less than that of all CAD-CAM PMMAs after disinfection, regardless of the protocol.

摘要

问题陈述

目前尚不清楚哪种消毒方案能为计算机辅助设计与计算机辅助制造(CAD-CAM)聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)材料提供最佳的水接触角和显微硬度。

目的

本体外研究的目的是通过将不同的消毒方案(1%次氯酸钠、假牙清洁凝胶和泡腾片)与热聚合PMMA进行比较,评估其对不同CAD-CAM PMMA义齿基托材料的水接触角和显微硬度的影响。

材料与方法

从3种不同的CAD-CAM PMMA(AvaDent(AV)、Merz M-PM(M-PM)和Polident(Poli))以及一种热聚合PMMA(Vynacron)(CV)制作圆盘形试件(Ø10×2 mm)(n = 21)。应用三种消毒方案(1%次氯酸钠[HC]、假牙清洁凝胶[GEL]、泡腾片[TAB])模拟180天的清洁过程。在消毒前后测量试件的水接触角和显微硬度,并使用双向方差分析进行比较(α = 0.05)。

结果

对于水接触角,材料(P = 0.010)和消毒方案(P = 0.002)有显著影响。材料(P < 0.001)、消毒方案(P = 0.001)及其相互作用(P < 0.001)对消毒后的显微硬度有显著影响。当将消毒后的情况与消毒前的情况进行比较时,在所有材料-消毒方案组合中,水接触角均显著增加(P≤0.025),除了GEL处理的(P = 0.689)或TAB处理的(P = 0.307)AV、HC处理的M-PM(P = 0.219)和TAB处理的Poli(P = 0.159)外,所有材料-消毒方案组合中的显微硬度均显著增加(P≤0.040)。

结论

材料和消毒方案会影响所有测试PMMA消毒后的水接触角,使热聚合或CAD-CAM PMMA的表面更疏水。无论采用何种方案,消毒后热聚合PMMA的显微硬度均低于所有CAD-CAM PMMA。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索