Suppr超能文献

负重方式重要吗?小儿扁平足单腿与双腿站立时的X线及足底压力测量差异

Does the way of weight-bearing matter? Single-leg and both-leg standing radiographic and pedobarographic differences in pediatric flatfoot.

作者信息

Pallamar Matthias, Bock Peter, Kranzl Andreas, Fruehwald-Pallamar Julia, Farr Sebastian, Ganger Rudolf

机构信息

From the Department of Pediatric Orthopaedics and Adult Foot and Ankle Surgery, Orthopaedic Hospital Speising, Vienna, Austria.

From the Department of Pediatric Orthopaedics and Adult Foot and Ankle Surgery, Orthopaedic Hospital Speising, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Gait Posture. 2022 Mar;93:135-141. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.01.009. Epub 2022 Jan 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

An exact definition is lacking for the term "weight-bearing" or different standing modalities when implementing foot radiographs for children and adults; moreover, only few studies have investigated the relationship between radiographic and pedobarographic measurements.

RESEARCH QUESTION

We hypothesized that the method of weight-bearing in single-leg and both-leg standing positions could influence the measurement results in radiographs and the distribution of foot pressure.

METHODS

This prospective study evaluated 33 children (66 feet) with flexible flatfoot deformities scheduled for subtalar screw arthroereisis surgery. Radiographs in the lateral and anteroposterior (AP) views were assessed independently in the single-leg and both-leg standing positions. Static pedobarography was performed as that for measuring weight-bearing. Standardized radiographic angles and pedobarographic data were analysed and correlated.

RESULTS

There were differences in radiographic measurements between the single-leg and both-leg standing positions, including the AP talocalcaneal angle (p = 0.032), AP talus-first metatarsal base angle (p = 0.003), AP talus-first metatarsal angle (p = 0.003), lateral calcaneal pitch angle (p = 0.001), talus-first metatarsal index (p = 0.004), and talocalcaneal index (p = 0.029). Moreover, differences between these two standing modalities were found in most of the static pedobarographic data, including the contact area (p = 0001), maximal force (p = 0.001), and peak pressure (p = 0.007). Overall, medial foot pressure increased more in both-leg standing than in the single-leg standing position, whereas radiographic measurements showed a more pronounced flatfoot deformity in the single-leg standing position. The AP talus-first metatarsal angle was the only angle or index with a significant association to some pedobarographic measurements in both standing modalities.

SIGNIFICANCE

As there are significant differences between single-leg standing and both-leg standing radiographic and static pedobarographic values, observers have to be precise in the definition of "weight-bearing" to gain reproducible and comparable study values in children and adults. We recommend acquiring both-leg standing foot radiographs because children with flexible flatfeet can stand more steadily in this position than in the single-leg standing position.

摘要

背景

在对儿童和成人进行足部X光检查时,“负重”或不同站立方式这一术语缺乏确切定义;此外,仅有少数研究调查了X光测量与足压测量之间的关系。

研究问题

我们假设单腿和双腿站立姿势下的负重方式可能会影响X光片测量结果以及足部压力分布。

方法

这项前瞻性研究评估了33例计划接受距下螺钉关节固定手术的柔韧性扁平足畸形儿童(66只脚)。分别在单腿和双腿站立姿势下独立评估侧位和前后位(AP)X光片。进行静态足压测量以测量负重情况。对标准化的X光角度和足压测量数据进行分析并建立相关性。

结果

单腿和双腿站立姿势下的X光测量存在差异,包括前后位距跟角(p = 0.032)、前后位距骨-第一跖骨基底角(p = 0.003)、前后位距骨-第一跖骨角(p = 0.003)、外侧跟骨倾斜角(p = 0.001)、距骨-第一跖骨指数(p = 0.004)和距跟指数(p = 0.029)。此外,在大多数静态足压测量数据中也发现了这两种站立方式之间的差异,包括接触面积(p = 0.001)、最大力(p = 0.001)和峰值压力(p = 0.007)。总体而言,双腿站立时足部内侧压力增加幅度大于单腿站立姿势,而X光测量显示单腿站立姿势下扁平足畸形更为明显。前后位距骨-第一跖骨角是两种站立方式下唯一与某些足压测量有显著关联的角度或指数。

意义

由于单腿站立和双腿站立的X光及静态足压测量值之间存在显著差异,观察者在定义“负重”时必须精确,以便在儿童和成人中获得可重复且可比的研究值。我们建议拍摄双腿站立位的足部X光片,因为柔韧性扁平足儿童在这个姿势下比单腿站立更稳定。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验