Suppr超能文献

随机对照试验:互动间隔教育支持儿科初级保健提供者管理便秘。

Randomized Controlled Trial of Interactive Spaced Education to Support Constipation Management by Pediatric Primary Care Providers.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center/University of Cincinnati College of Medicine.

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Biostatistics.

出版信息

J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2022 May 1;74(5):568-574. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003405.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Integrating continuing medical education and quality improvement (QI) initiatives is challenging. We aimed to compare one method, Interactive Spaced Education (ISE/QI), with standard (sTD/Qi) education embedded within a constipation management Qi initiative.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, controlled study to compare ISE/QI and STD/QI education. Pediatric primary care providers (PCPs) were recruited from a network of local private practices. The QI initiative was implemented with all providers before education interventions. ISE/QI participants received questions by email weekly, provided answers, received feedback, and repeated questions over a 4-month period. The STD/QI group received a Power Point with the same educational content. Pre- and post-surveys evaluated usability, self-assessed confidence, and practice changes while quizzes evaluated knowledge. Process control charts tracked subsequent visits to gastroenterology (GI).

RESULTS

Of the 212 eligible PCPs, 101 (48%) enrolled, with 49 PCPs in the ISE/QI arm and 52 in STD/QI education arm. Quiz scores improved in the ISE/QI arm with a strong effect size (Cohen d 1.76). Mean increase in confidence managing difficult cases was higher in the ISE/QI group (1.84 vs 1.21, P  = 0.030). ISE/QI participants were more likely to rate the activity better than most online education (odds ratio [OR] 18.1, P < 0.0001) and incorporate practice changes (OR 3.35, P = 0.0152). Visits to GI decreased among the entire population, but the effect on GI visits within each education arm was mixed.

CONCLUSIONS

ISE/QI improved knowledge and confidence managing difficult cases. ISE/QI participants reported higher likelihood to change practice, but no differences were seen in GI referrals.

摘要

简介

将继续医学教育和质量改进(QI)计划相结合具有挑战性。我们旨在比较一种方法,即互动间隔教育(ISE/QI)与嵌入便秘管理 QI 计划中的标准(sTD/Qi)教育。

方法

我们进行了一项随机对照研究,以比较 ISE/QI 和 STD/QI 教育。儿科初级保健提供者(PCP)从当地私人诊所网络招募。在教育干预之前,所有提供者都实施了 QI 计划。ISE/QI 参与者每周通过电子邮件收到问题,提供答案,接收反馈,并在 4 个月内重复问题。sTD/QI 组收到了相同教育内容的 Power Point。预调查和后调查评估了可用性、自我评估的信心和实践变化,而测验则评估了知识。过程控制图跟踪随后的胃肠病学(GI)就诊。

结果

在 212 名符合条件的 PCP 中,有 101 名(48%)参加了研究,其中 ISE/QI 组有 49 名 PCP,sTD/QI 教育组有 52 名。ISE/QI 组的测验分数有所提高,具有较强的效应量(Cohen d 1.76)。在处理困难病例方面,自我评估信心的平均提高幅度在 ISE/QI 组更高(1.84 与 1.21,P = 0.030)。ISE/QI 参与者更有可能认为该活动优于大多数在线教育(优势比 [OR] 18.1,P < 0.0001),并改变实践(OR 3.35,P = 0.0152)。尽管整个人群的 GI 就诊量都有所下降,但每个教育组的 GI 就诊量的影响则各不相同。

结论

ISE/QI 提高了知识和处理困难病例的信心。ISE/QI 参与者报告更有可能改变实践,但在 GI 转诊方面没有差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验