Suppr超能文献

19 种药物疗法治疗特发性血小板减少性紫癜患者的疗效比较:一项多治疗方法网络荟萃分析。

Comparative efficacy of 19 drug therapies for patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: a multiple-treatments network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Hematology and Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Soochow University, No. 92, Zhongnan Street, Suzhou, China.

出版信息

Ann Hematol. 2022 May;101(5):953-961. doi: 10.1007/s00277-022-04784-0. Epub 2022 Feb 12.

Abstract

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is the most common clinical bleeding disorder with a high mortality rate and poor long-term survival quality in severe patients. There is controversy on how to choose the appropriate treatment. We systematically reviewed 19 randomized controlled trials (including 2615 participants) from January 1, 2015, to April 20, 2021. These investigations compared multiple drugs or their combinations in the therapeutic dose range for the treatment of ITP. The primary endpoint was based on the proportion of patients who responded to these therapies. The efficacy of eltrombopag plus rituximab, avatrombopag, dexamethasone plus anti-HP, and dexamethasone plus rhTPO was significantly higher than placebo (OR: 46.66, 29.44, 2.66, 1.86) or dexamethasone alone (OR: 46.22, 29.01, 2.22, 1.40). Placebo, oral immunosuppressants, and dexamethasone plus oseltamivir were less effective than the other ITP therapies tested. Eltrombopag plus rituximab may be the best choice when starting treatment for ITP.

摘要

免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)是最常见的临床出血性疾病,重症患者死亡率高,长期生存质量差。对于如何选择合适的治疗方法存在争议。我们系统地回顾了 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 4 月 20 日期间的 19 项随机对照试验(包括 2615 名参与者),这些研究比较了多种药物或其组合在治疗剂量范围内治疗 ITP 的效果。主要终点是基于对这些治疗有反应的患者比例。依鲁替尼联合利妥昔单抗、avatrombopag、地塞米松联合抗 HP 和地塞米松联合 rhTPO 的疗效明显高于安慰剂(OR:46.66、29.44、2.66、1.86)或单独使用地塞米松(OR:46.22、29.01、2.22、1.40)。安慰剂、口服免疫抑制剂和地塞米松联合奥司他韦的疗效不如其他测试的 ITP 治疗方法。当开始治疗 ITP 时,依鲁替尼联合利妥昔单抗可能是最佳选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验