• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人力资本和生物容量对环境质量的影响:来自 G20 国家的证据。

The impact of human capital and bio-capacity on the environmental quality: evidence from G20 countries.

机构信息

Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Econometrics, Karadeniz Technical University, Kanuni Campus, Ortahisar/Trabzon, Turkey.

Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Public Finance, Karadeniz Technical University, Kanuni Campus, Ortahisar/Trabzon, Turkey.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(30):45635-45645. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19122-0. Epub 2022 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-022-19122-0
PMID:35149945
Abstract

This study investigates the effects of human capital, bio-capacity, energy use, and economic growth on the ecological footprint of G20 countries for the period 1970-2016, using the panel dynamic common correlated effects (DCCE) model. In the study, the G20 was considered in two groups, as developed and emerging economies. According to the DCCE estimation results, the long-term impact of human capital on the ecological footprint is negative and statistically strong in the developed economies while it is insignificant in the emerging economies. The impact of bio-capacity on the ecological footprint is positive in the short and long term in the emerging economies, and only in the short term in the developed economies. In addition, economic growth and energy use undermine the environmental quality in both groups of countries. The error correction coefficients are negative and statistically significant, which means that the deviations from the short-term equilibrium converge the long-term equilibrium level for both groups.

摘要

本研究利用面板动态共同相关效应(DCCE)模型,考察了 1970-2016 年间人力资本、生物容量、能源利用和经济增长对 G20 国家生态足迹的影响。研究中,将 G20 国家分为发达经济体和新兴经济体两组。根据 DCCE 估计结果,在发达经济体中,人力资本对生态足迹的长期影响为负,且在统计上显著,而在新兴经济体中则不显著。在新兴经济体中,生物容量对生态足迹的短期和长期影响均为正,而在发达经济体中仅在短期为正。此外,经济增长和能源利用均会损害两个国家组的环境质量。误差修正系数为负且在统计上显著,这意味着两组的短期均衡偏差都收敛于长期均衡水平。

相似文献

1
The impact of human capital and bio-capacity on the environmental quality: evidence from G20 countries.人力资本和生物容量对环境质量的影响:来自 G20 国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(30):45635-45645. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19122-0. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
2
Nexus between financial development, energy consumption, income level, and ecological footprint in CEE countries: do human capital and biocapacity matter?中东欧国家金融发展、能源消耗、收入水平与生态足迹的关系:人力资本和生物承载力重要吗?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Nov;26(31):31856-31872. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06343-z. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
3
The ecological impact assessment of globalization dimensions and human capital: a dynamic approach in the case of selected fossil fuel-rich countries.全球化维度与人力资本的生态影响评估:以部分化石燃料丰富国家为例的动态方法
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(16):47712-47726. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25655-9. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
4
The intermittent effects of renewable energy on ecological footprint: evidence from developing countries.可再生能源对生态足迹的间歇性影响:来自发展中国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Oct;28(40):56401-56417. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14600-3. Epub 2021 May 30.
5
Financial Development and Environmental Degradation: Promoting Low-Carbon Competitiveness in E7 Economies' Industries.金融发展与环境恶化:促进 E7 经济体产业的低碳竞争力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 6;19(23):16336. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316336.
6
Threshold effects of capital investments on carbon emissions in G20 economies.G20 经济体中资本投资对碳排放的阈值效应。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Aug;28(29):39052-39070. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13046-x. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
7
Economic growth and environmental technology simultaneously important for reducing energy poverty and ecological footprint in E7 economies: do political institutions play a role?经济增长与环境技术对减轻E7经济体的能源贫困和生态足迹同样重要:政治制度发挥作用吗?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 May;30(24):65102-65118. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26923-4. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
8
Dynamic common correlated effects of trade openness, FDI, and institutional performance on environmental quality: evidence from OIC countries.贸易开放、外国直接投资和制度绩效对环境质量的动态共同关联效应:来自 OIC 国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(11):11671-11682. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07768-7. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
9
Determinants of ecological and carbon footprints to assess the framework of environmental sustainability in BRICS countries: A panel ARDL and causality estimation model.评估金砖国家环境可持续性框架的生态和碳足迹决定因素:面板 ARDL 和因果关系估计模型。
Environ Res. 2021 Jun;197:111111. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111111. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
10
Trade-environment nexus in OIC countries: fresh insights from environmental Kuznets curve using GHG emissions and ecological footprint.伊斯兰合作组织国家的贸易与环境关系:基于温室气体排放和生态足迹的环境库兹涅茨曲线的新见解
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jan;28(4):4531-4548. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10845-6. Epub 2020 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Renewable energy and ecological footprint nexus: Evidence from dynamic panel threshold technique.可再生能源与生态足迹的关系:来自动态面板阈值技术的证据
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 22;10(13):e33442. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33442. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
2
Forecasting the ecological footprint of G20 countries in the next 30 years.预测二十国集团国家未来30年的生态足迹。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 9;14(1):8298. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57994-z.
3
Effects of Human Capital on Energy Consumption: The Role of Income Inequality.人力资本对能源消费的影响:收入不平等的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 18;19(24):17005. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192417005.