Interventional Cardiology Unit, Cardiology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Spain.
Interventional Cardiology Unit, Cardiology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Spain.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Sep;42:114-120. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.02.001. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
TiNO-coated BAS have demonstrated competitive outcomes compared to drug-eluting stents (DES). These devices allow short antiplatelet regimens and may be a good option for the growing elderly population undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Multicenter observational trial in routine clinical practice. A propensity-score matched analysis compared a prospective cohort of patients ≥ 75 years undergoing PCI with BAS, with a contemporary and retrospective cohort treated with last-generation DES. The co-primary endpoints of the study were the Target-Lesion-Failure (Cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization) and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (total death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, or new revascularization) at 1 year.
Whole population included 1000 patients, and 326 patients in each group were matched for analysis. No differences in primary endpoints were found: TLF 10.4% vs. 11% (HR 0.96 (Confidence Interval 95%, 0.36-1.7; p = 0.87)) and MACE 16.3% vs. 17.2% (HR 0.98 (Confidence Interval 95%; 0.3-1.5, p = 0.93)). Patients treated with BAS received shorter antiplatelets regimens (dual antiplatelet therapy at 1 year, 25.7% vs. 70.6%, p = 0.0001), and they presented lower incidence of bleeding (3.7% vs. 11.7%, HR 0.3 (IC 95% 0.16-0.6, p = 0.001)).
In this real-life registry of patients ≥ 75 years, BAS were similar to the latest-generation DES in terms of efficacy and reduced the duration of the antithrombotic therapy, lowering bleeding events.
钛诺涂层 BAS 与药物洗脱支架 (DES) 相比具有竞争优势。这些设备允许使用短期抗血小板治疗方案,对于接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 (PCI) 的日益增长的老年人群来说可能是一个不错的选择。
这是一项在常规临床实践中进行的多中心观察性试验。采用倾向评分匹配分析比较了≥ 75 岁接受 BAS 治疗的 PCI 患者的前瞻性队列,以及接受上一代 DES 治疗的同期回顾性队列。该研究的主要复合终点为 1 年时的靶病变失败(心脏死亡、非致死性心肌梗死或靶病变血运重建)和主要不良心血管事件(总死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、卒中和新血运重建)。
全人群纳入 1000 例患者,每组 326 例患者进行匹配分析。主要终点无差异:TLF 为 10.4% 比 11%(HR 0.96(95%置信区间 0.36-1.7;p = 0.87))和 MACE 为 16.3% 比 17.2%(HR 0.98(95%置信区间 0.3-1.5,p = 0.93))。接受 BAS 治疗的患者接受了更短时间的抗血小板治疗方案(1 年时双联抗血小板治疗,25.7% 比 70.6%,p = 0.0001),且出血发生率更低(3.7% 比 11.7%,HR 0.3(95%置信区间 0.16-0.6,p = 0.001))。
在这项≥ 75 岁患者的真实世界登记研究中,BAS 在疗效方面与最新一代 DES 相似,并缩短了抗血栓治疗的持续时间,降低了出血事件的发生风险。