Suppr超能文献

静脉注射甲磺酸萘莫司他治疗 COVID 肺炎的随机对照试验:探索安全性、药代动力学和药效学的 1b/2a 期实验研究。

Randomised controlled trial of intravenous nafamostat mesylate in COVID pneumonitis: Phase 1b/2a experimental study to investigate safety, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

机构信息

Centre for Inflammation Research, Queen's Medical Research Institute, BioQuarter, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, BioQuarter, Little France, Edinburgh.

Centre for Inflammation Research, Queen's Medical Research Institute, BioQuarter, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

EBioMedicine. 2022 Feb;76:103856. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103856. Epub 2022 Feb 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many repurposed drugs have progressed rapidly to Phase 2 and 3 trials in COVID19 without characterisation of Pharmacokinetics /Pharmacodynamics including safety data. One such drug is nafamostat mesylate.

METHODS

We present the findings of a phase Ib/IIa open label, platform randomised controlled trial of intravenous nafamostat in hospitalised patients with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonitis. Patients were assigned randomly to standard of care (SoC), nafamostat or an alternative therapy. Nafamostat was administered as an intravenous infusion at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg/h for a maximum of seven days. The analysis population included those who received any dose of the trial drug and all patients randomised to SoC. The primary outcomes of our trial were the safety and tolerability of intravenous nafamostat as an add on therapy for patients hospitalised with COVID-19 pneumonitis.

FINDINGS

Data is reported from 42 patients, 21 of which were randomly assigned to receive intravenous nafamostat. 86% of nafamostat-treated patients experienced at least one AE compared to 57% of the SoC group. The nafamostat group were significantly more likely to experience at least one AE (posterior mean odds ratio 5.17, 95% credible interval (CI) 1.10 - 26.05) and developed significantly higher plasma creatinine levels (posterior mean difference 10.57 micromol/L, 95% CI 2.43-18.92). An average longer hospital stay was observed in nafamostat patients, alongside a lower rate of oxygen free days (rate ratio 0.55-95% CI 0.31-0.99, respectively). There were no other statistically significant differences in endpoints between nafamostat and SoC. PK data demonstrated that intravenous nafamostat was rapidly broken down to inactive metabolites. We observed no significant anticoagulant effects in thromboelastometry.

INTERPRETATION

In hospitalised patients with COVID-19, we did not observe evidence of anti-inflammatory, anticoagulant or antiviral activity with intravenous nafamostat, and there were additional adverse events.

FUNDING

DEFINE was funded by LifeArc (an independent medical research charity) under the STOPCOVID award to the University of Edinburgh. We also thank the Oxford University COVID-19 Research Response Fund (BRD00230).

摘要

背景

许多已重新定位用途的药物在没有对包括安全性数据在内的药代动力学/药效学进行特征描述的情况下,迅速进入 COVID19 的 2 期和 3 期试验。甲磺酸萘莫司他就是这样一种药物。

方法

我们报告了一项 Ib/IIa 期开放标签、平台随机对照试验的结果,该试验将静脉内甲磺酸萘莫司他用于住院的 COVID-19 肺炎患者。患者被随机分配至标准治疗(SoC)、甲磺酸萘莫司他或替代治疗。甲磺酸萘莫司他以 0.2mg/kg/h 的剂量静脉内输注,最多持续 7 天。分析人群包括接受任何剂量试验药物的患者和所有随机分配至 SoC 的患者。我们试验的主要结局是静脉内甲磺酸萘莫司他作为 COVID-19 肺炎住院患者附加治疗的安全性和耐受性。

结果

报告了 42 名患者的数据,其中 21 名随机分配至接受静脉内甲磺酸萘莫司他。与 SoC 组的 57%相比,接受甲磺酸萘莫司他治疗的患者中至少有 1 例出现 AE 的比例更高(后验平均优势比 5.17,95%置信区间(CI)1.10-26.05),并且显著更高的血浆肌酐水平(后验平均差值 10.57µmol/L,95%CI 2.43-18.92)。与甲磺酸萘莫司他患者相比,观察到住院时间平均更长,并且氧气无天数的比例更低(速率比 0.55-95%CI 0.31-0.99,分别)。在甲磺酸萘莫司他与 SoC 之间,在终点方面没有其他统计学上的显著差异。药代动力学数据表明,静脉内甲磺酸萘莫司他迅速分解为无活性的代谢物。在血栓弹性描记法中未观察到明显的抗凝作用。

解释

在 COVID-19 住院患者中,我们没有观察到静脉内甲磺酸萘莫司他具有抗炎、抗凝或抗病毒活性的证据,并且有额外的不良事件。

资金

DEFINE 由独立医学研究慈善机构 LifeArc(生命之弧)根据爱丁堡大学的 STOPCOVID 奖资助,我们还要感谢牛津大学 COVID-19 研究应对基金(BRD00230)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd77/8844866/244af1293635/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验