Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound for acquiring the pathological diagnosis of gastrointestinal lymphoma.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

This study aims to assess the value of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for acquiring a pathological diagnosis of gastrointestinal lymphoma (GIL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all GIL patients who underwent EUS from November 2011 to July 2020 at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. All patients with pathologically confirmed GIL were included. The characteristics of the lesions were recorded, and the efficacy for acquiring pathologic diagnosis between white light endoscopy (WLE) and EUS was analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 404 patients with GIL who underwent EUS examination were included in this study. GIL was confirmed in 143 cases by after EUS judgment biopsy (AEJ biopsy), 11 cases by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), 293 cases by WLE biopsy, and 10 cases by surgical pathology for repeated negative pathologic results from EUS and WLE. Among all cases, 78.71% (318/404) were T1-T2, whereas 32.18% (130/404) were determined to have multiple lesions in the digestive tract wall. The positive rates of the WLE biopsy and AEJ biopsy of the involved gastric wall were 77.93% (293/376) and 89.38% (143/160), respectively. Twelve cases showed diffuse thickening of the gastric wall, and the total positive rate of EUS was 91.67% but 0% for WLE with this type of GIL. The total positive rate and positive rate during the first examination of EUS were all significantly higher than those of WLE. Moreover, 19.68% of the patients showed negative results during their WLE examination and then received a positive pathologic diagnosis upon EUS examination, but none had the opposite process.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS was found to be a better tool for acquiring a pathological diagnosis of GIL than conventional WLE, especially for GIL similar to linitis plastica.