• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

黑人男性和白人男性感知到的种族主义是否会影响前列腺癌筛查率和医患共享讨论?

Does Perceived Racism Affect Prostate Cancer Screening Rates and Patient-Provider Shared Discussions Among Black and White Men?

出版信息

J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2022;33(1):5-19. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2022.0003.

DOI:10.1353/hpu.2022.0003
PMID:35153202
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While Black men face a significant cancer risk burden in the United States, confronting complex historical and social issues such as racism and discrimination undermines care. This study explored associations between perceived racism, prostate screening rates, and shared medical discussions.

METHODS

We performed data analysis of merged Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey data. Data were limited to Black and White men. We used propensity score analysis to assess the race-associated effects on outcomes.

RESULTS

Black men were less likely than White men to receive discussions of both prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening advantages χ2(4.54), p < .05 and disadvantages χ2(41.62), p < .001. The effects of perceived racism and its interaction with race were statistically non-significant for all PSA outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Compared with their White counterparts, Black men were significantly less likely to be advised of potential PSA screening advantages and harms. This inequity in health care delivery has implications concerning disease prevention and informed decision-making.

摘要

背景

尽管美国的黑人男性面临着巨大的癌症风险负担,但面临着种族主义和歧视等复杂的历史和社会问题,这削弱了他们的医疗保健。本研究探讨了感知到的种族主义、前列腺筛查率和共同的医疗讨论之间的关联。

方法

我们对合并的行为风险因素监测系统(BRFSS)调查数据进行了数据分析。数据仅限于黑人和白人男性。我们使用倾向评分分析来评估种族对结果的影响。

结果

与白人男性相比,黑人男性接受前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查优势讨论的可能性较小 χ2(4.54),p <.05 和劣势 χ2(41.62),p <.001。对于所有 PSA 结果,感知到的种族主义及其与种族的相互作用的影响均无统计学意义。

结论

与白人男性相比,黑人男性接受潜在 PSA 筛查优势和危害咨询的可能性明显较小。这种医疗保健提供方面的不平等会对疾病预防和知情决策产生影响。

相似文献

1
Does Perceived Racism Affect Prostate Cancer Screening Rates and Patient-Provider Shared Discussions Among Black and White Men?黑人男性和白人男性感知到的种族主义是否会影响前列腺癌筛查率和医患共享讨论?
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2022;33(1):5-19. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2022.0003.
2
Disparities Associated with Shared Decision-making in Prostate Cancer Screening.前列腺癌筛查中与共同决策相关的差异。
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Nov;9(6):1008-1015. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.04.013. Epub 2023 May 15.
3
Pre-screening Discussions and Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing for Prostate Cancer Screening.前列腺癌筛查的预筛查讨论及前列腺特异性抗原检测
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2):259-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.007. Epub 2015 May 18.
4
Physician Attitudes and Self-reported Practices Toward Prostate Cancer Screening in Black and White Men.黑人和白人男性医生对前列腺癌筛查的态度和自我报告的实践。
Fam Med. 2022 Jan;54(1):30-37. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2022.474827.
5
Determinants of Prostate Specific Antigen Screening among Black Men in the United States in the Contemporary Era.当代美国黑人男性前列腺特异性抗原筛查的决定因素。
J Urol. 2016 Apr;195(4 Pt 1):913-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.11.023. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
6
The State of Prescreening Discussions About Prostate-specific Antigen Testing Following Implementation of the 2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force Statement.2012年美国预防服务工作组声明实施后前列腺特异性抗原检测的预筛查讨论状况
Urology. 2017 Jun;104:122-130. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.12.069. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
7
National evidence on the use of shared decision making in prostate-specific antigen screening.国家关于在前列腺特异性抗原筛查中使用共同决策的证据。
Ann Fam Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;11(4):306-14. doi: 10.1370/afm.1539.
8
Reactions to Recommendations and Evidence About Prostate Cancer Screening Among White and Black Male Veterans.针对前列腺癌筛查的建议和证据,白人和黑人男性退伍军人的反应。
Am J Mens Health. 2021 May-Jun;15(3):15579883211022110. doi: 10.1177/15579883211022110.
9
Prostate Cancer Screening and Young Black Men: Can Early Communication Avoid Later Health Disparities?前列腺癌筛查与年轻黑人男性:早期沟通能否避免后期健康差距?
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Oct;37(5):1460-1465. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-01984-6. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
10
Are Men Making Informed Decisions According to the Prostate-Specific Antigen Test Guidelines? Analysis of the 2015 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.男性是否根据前列腺特异性抗原检测指南做出知情决策?2015 年行为风险因素监测系统分析。
Am J Mens Health. 2019 Mar-Apr;13(2):1557988319834843. doi: 10.1177/1557988319834843.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Racial Disparities in Awareness and Perceptions of Oncology Clinical Trials: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Baseline Data From the mychoice Study.探索肿瘤学临床试验认知和观念方面的种族差异:mychoice 研究基线数据的横断面分析。
JMIR Cancer. 2024 Sep 30;10:e56048. doi: 10.2196/56048.
2
Shared decision-making before prostate cancer screening decisions.前列腺癌筛查决策前的共同决策。
Nat Rev Urol. 2024 Jun;21(6):329-338. doi: 10.1038/s41585-023-00840-0. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
3
Prostate Cancer Screening and Strategies, Florida Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2012-2020.
前列腺癌筛查与策略,佛罗里达行为风险因素监测系统,2012 - 2020年
Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Nov 22;20:E108. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.230203.
4
The Risk Factors and Screening Uptake for Prostate Cancer: A Scoping Review.前列腺癌的风险因素与筛查接受情况:一项范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 20;11(20):2780. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11202780.
5
Associations of Content and Context of Communication with Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing.沟通的内容和情境与前列腺特异性抗原检测的关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 4;20(9):5721. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20095721.
6
Neighborhood deprivation, racial segregation and associations with cancer risk and outcomes across the cancer-control continuum.社区剥夺、种族隔离与癌症风险和癌症防治连续统各阶段结局的关联。
Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Apr;28(4):1494-1501. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02006-1. Epub 2023 Mar 3.