• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Prostate Cancer Screening and Young Black Men: Can Early Communication Avoid Later Health Disparities?前列腺癌筛查与年轻黑人男性:早期沟通能否避免后期健康差距?
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Oct;37(5):1460-1465. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-01984-6. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
2
Do Men Receive Information Required for Shared Decision Making About PSA Testing? Results from a National Survey.男性是否获得了关于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测共同决策所需的信息?一项全国性调查的结果。
J Cancer Educ. 2016 Dec;31(4):693-701. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0870-8.
3
Physician Consultations, Prostate Cancer Knowledge, and PSA Screening of African American Men in the Era of Shared Decision-Making.共同决策时代非裔美国男性的医生咨询、前列腺癌知识与前列腺特异性抗原筛查
Am J Mens Health. 2018 Jul;12(4):751-759. doi: 10.1177/1557988318763673. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
4
Disparities Associated with Shared Decision-making in Prostate Cancer Screening.前列腺癌筛查中与共同决策相关的差异。
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Nov;9(6):1008-1015. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.04.013. Epub 2023 May 15.
5
Randomized trial of community health worker-led decision coaching to promote shared decision-making for prostate cancer screening among Black male patients and their providers.由社区卫生工作者主导的决策指导促进黑人男性患者及其医疗服务提供者共同参与前列腺癌筛查决策的随机试验。
Trials. 2021 Feb 10;22(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05064-4.
6
The State of Prescreening Discussions About Prostate-specific Antigen Testing Following Implementation of the 2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force Statement.2012年美国预防服务工作组声明实施后前列腺特异性抗原检测的预筛查讨论状况
Urology. 2017 Jun;104:122-130. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.12.069. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
7
National evidence on the use of shared decision making in prostate-specific antigen screening.国家关于在前列腺特异性抗原筛查中使用共同决策的证据。
Ann Fam Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;11(4):306-14. doi: 10.1370/afm.1539.
8
Prostate-Specimen Antigen (PSA) Screening and Shared Decision Making Among Deaf and Hearing Male Patients.聋人和听力正常男性患者的前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查与共同决策
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Feb;35(1):28-35. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1436-3.
9
Fostering shared decision-making about prostate cancer screening among African American men patients and their primary care providers: a randomized behavioral clinical trial.促进非洲裔美国男性患者及其初级保健提供者就前列腺癌筛查进行共同决策:一项随机行为临床试验。
Trials. 2022 Aug 13;23(1):653. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06605-1.
10
Pre-screening Discussions and Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing for Prostate Cancer Screening.前列腺癌筛查的预筛查讨论及前列腺特异性抗原检测
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2):259-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.007. Epub 2015 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Prostate cancer screening: Knowledge, attitudes and practices in a sample of men in Ramotswa, Botswana.前列腺癌筛查:博茨瓦纳拉莫茨瓦男性样本中的知识、态度与实践
J Public Health Res. 2025 Jun 26;14(2):22799036251349640. doi: 10.1177/22799036251349640. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Shared decision-making before prostate cancer screening decisions.前列腺癌筛查决策前的共同决策。
Nat Rev Urol. 2024 Jun;21(6):329-338. doi: 10.1038/s41585-023-00840-0. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
3
Disparities in testicular cancer incidence, mortality, and place of death trends from 1999 to 2020: A comprehensive cohort study.1999 年至 2020 年睾丸癌发病率、死亡率和死亡地点趋势的差异:一项综合队列研究。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2023 Oct;6(10):e1880. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1880. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
4
Associations of Content and Context of Communication with Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing.沟通的内容和情境与前列腺特异性抗原检测的关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 4;20(9):5721. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20095721.
5
Health Burdens and SES in Alabama: Using Geographic Information System to Examine Prostate Cancer Health Disparity.阿拉巴马州的健康负担与社会经济地位:利用地理信息系统研究前列腺癌健康差异。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 2;14(19):4824. doi: 10.3390/cancers14194824.
6
Highly portable quantitative screening test for prostate-specific antigen at point of care.用于即时检测的高便携性前列腺特异性抗原定量筛查试验。
Curr Res Biotechnol. 2021;3:288-299. doi: 10.1016/j.crbiot.2021.11.003. Epub 2021 Nov 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.前列腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1901-1913. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3710.
2
Knowledge of Prostate Cancer and Screening Among Young Multiethnic Black Men.年轻多族裔黑人男性对前列腺癌及筛查的了解
Am J Mens Health. 2017 Jul;11(4):1008-1018. doi: 10.1177/1557988316689497. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
3
The effect of the USPSTF PSA screening recommendation on prostate cancer incidence patterns in the USA.USPSTF PSA 筛查推荐对美国前列腺癌发病模式的影响。
Nat Rev Urol. 2017 Jan;14(1):26-37. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.251. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
4
Determinants of Prostate Specific Antigen Screening among Black Men in the United States in the Contemporary Era.当代美国黑人男性前列腺特异性抗原筛查的决定因素。
J Urol. 2016 Apr;195(4 Pt 1):913-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.11.023. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
5
Do Men Receive Information Required for Shared Decision Making About PSA Testing? Results from a National Survey.男性是否获得了关于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测共同决策所需的信息?一项全国性调查的结果。
J Cancer Educ. 2016 Dec;31(4):693-701. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0870-8.
6
Ever and Annual Use of Prostate Cancer Screening in African American Men.非裔美国男性前列腺癌筛查的长期及年度使用情况。
Am J Mens Health. 2017 Jan;11(1):99-107. doi: 10.1177/1557988315596225. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
7
Pre-screening age African-American males: what do they know about prostate cancer screening, knowledge, and risk perceptions?对非裔美国男性进行筛查前年龄评估:他们对前列腺癌筛查、知识和风险认知了解多少?
Soc Work Health Care. 2014;53(3):268-88. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2013.875503.
8
National evidence on the use of shared decision making in prostate-specific antigen screening.国家关于在前列腺特异性抗原筛查中使用共同决策的证据。
Ann Fam Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;11(4):306-14. doi: 10.1370/afm.1539.
9
Racial differences in PSA screening interval and stage at diagnosis.PSA 筛查间隔和诊断时的分期存在种族差异。
Cancer Causes Control. 2010 Jul;21(7):1071-80. doi: 10.1007/s10552-010-9535-4. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
10
Detection of life-threatening prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen velocity during a window of curability.在可治愈窗口期利用前列腺特异性抗原速度检测危及生命的前列腺癌。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Nov 1;98(21):1521-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj410.

前列腺癌筛查与年轻黑人男性:早期沟通能否避免后期健康差距?

Prostate Cancer Screening and Young Black Men: Can Early Communication Avoid Later Health Disparities?

机构信息

Jack, Joseph, and Morton Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, 11235 Bellflower Road, Cleveland, OH, 44106-7164, USA.

Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2022 Oct;37(5):1460-1465. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-01984-6. Epub 2021 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1007/s13187-021-01984-6
PMID:33689157
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7943410/
Abstract

This study aims to determine if younger men, across racial and ethnic groups, discussed the benefits/risks/harms of PSA screening with health care professionals. Publicly available data were obtained from the Health Information National Trends Survey https://hints.cancer.gov/ in March 2019. Cross-sectional analysis of 518 men between the ages of 18 and 49 years from men who completed the survey between October 2011 and February 2012 (HINTS cycle 4) was performed. We used logistic regression to evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and discussions around PSA. Less than 10% of the participants reported a prior PSA; Black and Hispanic men were more likely compared with White men. Compared with White men, Black and other race men reported receiving less communications from some doctors recommending PSA screening (OR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.07-0.38; OR: 0.10, 95% CI: 0.04-0.25), and that no one is sure PSA testing saves lives (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.04-6.91; OR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.06-0.48). Minority men, while more likely to have had a PSA, were less likely to be told of the harms and benefits of PSA testing, compared with White men. Increasing communication surrounding screening advantages and disadvantages between providers and patients can increase awareness and knowledge among younger men. In a post-COVID-19 environment, communication regarding the return to preventative screenings within vulnerable populations is an important message to convey. Research shows preventive screenings have dropped across all population groups due to the pandemic yet the decline disproportionately affects Black and other minority men.

摘要

本研究旨在确定年轻男性(跨越种族和族裔群体)是否与医疗保健专业人员讨论过 PSA 筛查的益处/风险/危害。从 2011 年 10 月至 2012 年 2 月(HINTS 周期 4)期间完成调查的 18 至 49 岁男性中,获得了来自健康信息国家趋势调查 https://hints.cancer.gov/ 的公开可用数据。对 518 名男性进行了横断面分析。我们使用逻辑回归来评估种族/族裔与 PSA 讨论之间的关联。不到 10%的参与者报告有过 PSA 检查;黑人男性和西班牙裔男性比白人男性更有可能这样做。与白人男性相比,黑人男性和其他种族男性报告称,一些医生推荐 PSA 筛查的沟通较少(OR:0.16,95%CI:0.07-0.38;OR:0.10,95%CI:0.04-0.25),并且不确定 PSA 检测是否能挽救生命(OR:0.49,95%CI:0.04-6.91;OR:0.17,95%CI:0.06-0.48)。与白人男性相比,少数族裔男性虽然更有可能进行 PSA 检查,但他们被告知 PSA 检查的危害和益处的可能性较小。增加提供者和患者之间关于筛查优缺点的沟通可以提高年轻男性的意识和知识。在 COVID-19 之后的环境中,向弱势群体传达有关恢复预防筛查的信息是一个重要的信息。研究表明,由于大流行,所有人群的预防筛查都有所下降,但下降幅度不成比例地影响了黑人和其他少数族裔男性。