• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A registry study on radial head arthroplasties in the Netherlands: Indications, types and short-term survival.荷兰一项关于桡骨头置换术的登记研究:适应症、类型和短期生存率。
Shoulder Elbow. 2022 Feb;14(1):96-102. doi: 10.1177/1758573220987843. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
2
Analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in a community-based implant registry.基于社区的植入物登记处中单间室膝关节置换术的分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Nov(416):111-9. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000093004.90435.d1.
3
Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.对于65岁以下男性,伯明翰髋关节表面置换术的生存率是否优于某些传统髋关节置换术?来自澳大利亚骨科协会国家关节置换登记处的一项研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Nov;478(11):2625-2636. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001453.
4
Five-year results of the ASR XL Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.ASR XL 髋臼系统和 ASR 髋关节表面置换系统的 5 年结果:来自澳大利亚矫形协会全国关节置换登记处的分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21;93(24):2287-93. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01727.
5
Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.金属对金属髋关节表面置换翻修术后10年时生存率低且并发症频繁。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Feb;475(2):304-314. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4882-4.
6
Mid-term clinical outcome comparison of long-stemmed monopolar osseointegrated and short-stemmed bipolar radial head prostheses.长柄单极骨整合型与短柄双极桡骨头假体的中期临床结果比较
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 May;141(5):823-830. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03534-z. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
7
Arthroplasty with a metal radial head for unreconstructible fractures of the radial head.采用金属桡骨头置换术治疗不可重建的桡骨头骨折。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Aug;83(8):1201-11. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200108000-00010.
8
Outcomes of radial head implants in total elbow arthroplasty.桡骨头植入物在全肘置换术中的疗效。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Mar;31(3):501-508. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.10.007. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
9
Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years: an analysis of 1,037 revisions in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.55 岁以下患者髋关节翻修术的结果:荷兰关节置换登记处 1037 例翻修分析。
Acta Orthop. 2020 Apr;91(2):165-170. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1708655. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
10
High Risk of Further Surgery After Radial Head Replacement for Unstable Fractures: Longer-term Outcomes at a Minimum Follow-up of 8 Years.桡骨头置换术后不稳定骨折再次手术风险高:至少 8 年的长期随访结果。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Nov;477(11):2531-2540. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000876.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and radiological outcome of Mason-Johnston types III and IV radial head fractures treated by an on-table reconstruction.经桌上重建治疗 Mason-Johnston 类型 III 和 IV 桡骨头骨折的临床和放射学结果。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Nov 19;17(1):503. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03394-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Global trends in indications for total elbow arthroplasty: a systematic review of national registries.全肘关节置换术适应证的全球趋势:对国家注册登记处的系统评价
EFORT Open Rev. 2020 Apr 2;5(4):215-220. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190036. eCollection 2020 Apr.
2
Comparison of bipolar and monopolar radial head prostheses in elbow fracture-dislocation.桡骨头双极和单极假体治疗肘关节骨折脱位的比较。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Apr;106(2):311-317. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.10.027. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
3
Why does radial head arthroplasty fail today? A systematic review of recent literature.为何如今桡骨头置换术会失败?近期文献的系统评价
EFORT Open Rev. 2020 Jan 28;4(12):659-667. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180099. eCollection 2019 Dec.
4
Use of an Extensile Posterior Approach to the Elbow Joint: Early Results of the Anconeus Approach.采用肘关节后外侧延长入路:肘肌入路的早期结果
J Orthop Trauma. 2020 Aug;34(8):e287-e290. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001725.
5
Detachment of Extensor Carpi Ulnaris and Anterior Branches of the Radial Collateral Ligament from the Epicondyle: A Modification of Kocher Lateral Approach for the Treatment of Radial Head Fractures.尺侧腕伸肌及桡侧副韧带前支从肱骨外上髁的附着点分离:一种改良的Kocher外侧入路治疗桡骨头骨折。
Joints. 2019 Oct 11;7(2):31-36. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1697613. eCollection 2019 Jun.
6
Does radial head implant fixation affect functional outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.桡骨头植入物固定是否会影响功能结果?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Jan;28(1):126-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.07.032. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
7
Radial Head Resection versus Arthroplasty in Unrepairable Comminuted Fractures Mason Type III and Type IV: A Systematic Review.桡骨头切除术与关节成形术治疗不可修复粉碎性骨折 Mason Ⅲ型和Ⅳ型:系统评价。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jul 16;2018:4020625. doi: 10.1155/2018/4020625. eCollection 2018.
8
Radial head arthroplasty: a historical perspective.桡骨头置换术:历史回顾。
Int Orthop. 2019 Jul;43(7):1643-1651. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4082-9. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
9
Radial head replacement with a bipolar system: an average 10-year follow-up.双极系统行桡骨头置换术:平均 10 年随访结果。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Feb;27(2):e38-e44. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
10
The Rate of Radial Head Prosthesis Removal or Revision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.桡骨头假体取出或翻修率:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Hand Surg Am. 2018 Jan;43(1):39-53.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.08.031. Epub 2017 Oct 18.

荷兰一项关于桡骨头置换术的登记研究:适应症、类型和短期生存率。

A registry study on radial head arthroplasties in the Netherlands: Indications, types and short-term survival.

作者信息

Macken Arno A, Prkić Ante, Koenraadt Koen Lm, van Oost Iris, Spekenbrink-Spooren Anneke, The Bertram, Eygendaal Denise

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.

Foundation for Orthopedic Research, Care and Education (FORCE), Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Shoulder Elbow. 2022 Feb;14(1):96-102. doi: 10.1177/1758573220987843. Epub 2021 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1177/1758573220987843
PMID:35154411
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8832694/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to use the Dutch Arthroplasty Register data to report an overview of the contemporary indications and implant designs, and report the short-term survival of radial head arthroplasty.

METHODS

From the Dutch Arthroplasty Register, data on patient demographics, surgery and revision were extracted for radial head arthroplasties performed from January 2014 to December 2019. Implant survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-eight arthroplasties were included with a median follow-up of 2.2 years. The most common indication was a fracture of the radial head (178, 69%). One hundred thirty-nine (68%) of the prostheses were of bipolar design, and the most commonly used implant type was the Radial Head System (Tornier; 134, 51%). Of the 258 included radial head arthroplasties, 16 were revised at a median of six months after surgery. Reason for revision was predominantly aseptic loosening (9). The overall implant survival was 95.8% after one year, 90.5% after three years and 89.5% after five years.

DISCUSSION

For radial head arthroplasties, acute trauma is the most common indication and Radial Head System the most commonly used implant. The implant survival is 89.5% after five years.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在利用荷兰关节成形术登记数据报告当代手术适应症及植入物设计概况,并报告桡骨头置换术的短期生存率。

方法

从荷兰关节成形术登记处提取2014年1月至2019年12月期间进行的桡骨头置换术的患者人口统计学、手术及翻修数据。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算植入物生存率。

结果

纳入258例置换术,中位随访时间为2.2年。最常见的适应症是桡骨头骨折(178例,69%)。139例(68%)假体为双极设计,最常用的植入物类型是桡骨头系统(Tornier公司;134例,51%)。在258例纳入的桡骨头置换术中,16例在术后中位时间6个月时进行了翻修。翻修的主要原因是无菌性松动(9例)。1年时植入物总体生存率为95.8%,3年时为90.5%,5年时为89.5%。

讨论

对于桡骨头置换术,急性创伤是最常见的适应症,桡骨头系统是最常用的植入物。5年后植入物生存率为89.5%。