Suppr超能文献

液体活检与组织活检在乳腺癌患者中应用数字PCR和免疫组化/荧光原位杂交检测HER2扩增的比较

Liquid Biopsy and Tissue Biopsy Comparison with Digital PCR and IHC/FISH for HER2 Amplification Detection in Breast Cancer Patients.

作者信息

Xie Suhong, Wang Yan, Gong Zhiyun, Li Yuan, Yang Wentao, Liu Guangyu, Li Jianwei, Hu Xin, Wang Yanchun, Tong Yin, Yuan Peng, Si Yiran, Kang Yikun, Mao Yong, Qi Xiaowei, Liu Yankui, Ou Jiajia, Li Zhaoliang, Pan Xin, Lv Zhaoqing, Kaji Kavanaugh, Guo Lin, Lu Renquan

机构信息

Department of Clinical Laboratory, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, P. R. China.

Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical School, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China.

出版信息

J Cancer. 2022 Jan 1;13(3):744-751. doi: 10.7150/jca.66567. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Two hundred twenty-four breast cancer patients with paired tissue and plasma samples were enrolled from 3 clinical centers to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of a digital PCR HER2 amplification assay. All patients were histologically confirmed diagnosis of locally advanced and recurrent or metastatic breast cancer with stage III/IV and had tissue HER2 status determinations using IHC/FISH. For the whole 224 advanced breast cancer patients, the sensitivity between dPCR in plasma and IHC/FISH in tissue samples is 43.75% (42/96), the specificity is 84.38% (108/128) and the overall concordance is 66.96% (150/224). Interestingly, when we looked at stage III, stage IV and recurrent or metastatic breast cancer separately, compared with IHC/FISH in tissue samples, the sensitivity of dPCR in plasma increases from 37.93% (11/29) for stage III to 41.67% (15/36) for stage IV cancer. Recurrent breast cancer patient had an increased sensitivity of 51.61% (16/31). This is consistent with our expectation sensitivity would increase concordantly as tumor burden goes up. On the other hand, specificity decreased from 92.68% (38/41) for stage III to 86.44% (51/59) for stage IV cancer. Recurrent breast cancer patient had a specificity of only 67.86% (19/28). This is, in part, due to inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. Many patients determined to be negative for HER2 amplification in tissue biopsy could have HER2 positive tumors at other sites, which was detected by the liquid biopsy. This study suggested the necessity of liquid biopsy for HER2 amplification detection and demonstrated digital PCR can be used as a companion diagnostic tool to determine HER2 amplification status. It also suggested that a liquid biopsy should follow a negative result from tissue biopsy to avoid false negative results especially for late-stage breast cancer patients and ones who experienced relapse or became resistant to current therapy. Future studies should focus on therapeutic effects on patients determined to be HER2 positive through liquid biopsy and collecting additional tissue biopsies to identify HER2 positive tumor when the original tissue biopsy and liquid biopsy don't agree.

摘要

从3个临床中心招募了224例有配对组织和血浆样本的乳腺癌患者,以评估数字PCR HER2扩增检测的敏感性和特异性。所有患者均经组织学确诊为局部晚期、复发或转移性III/IV期乳腺癌,并使用免疫组化(IHC)/荧光原位杂交(FISH)检测组织HER2状态。对于全部224例晚期乳腺癌患者,血浆数字PCR与组织样本IHC/FISH之间的敏感性为43.75%(42/96),特异性为84.38%(108/128),总体一致性为66.96%(150/224)。有趣的是,当我们分别观察III期、IV期以及复发或转移性乳腺癌时,与组织样本中的IHC/FISH相比,血浆数字PCR的敏感性从III期的37.93%(11/29)增加到IV期癌症的41.67%(15/36)。复发乳腺癌患者的敏感性增加到51.61%(16/31)。这与我们的预期一致,即随着肿瘤负荷增加,敏感性会相应提高。另一方面,特异性从III期的92.68%(38/41)降至IV期癌症的86.44%(51/59)。复发乳腺癌患者的特异性仅为67.86%(19/28)。这部分是由于肿瘤间和肿瘤内的异质性。许多在组织活检中被确定为HER2扩增阴性的患者,在其他部位可能有HER2阳性肿瘤,这可通过液体活检检测到。本研究表明了液体活检用于HER2扩增检测的必要性,并证明数字PCR可作为一种伴随诊断工具来确定HER2扩增状态。它还表明,对于晚期乳腺癌患者以及经历复发或对当前治疗耐药的患者,液体活检应在组织活检结果为阴性之后进行,以避免假阴性结果。未来的研究应关注对通过液体活检确定为HER2阳性的患者的治疗效果,并在原始组织活检和液体活检结果不一致时,收集额外的组织活检以识别HER2阳性肿瘤。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4595/8824896/c4875bc72ce4/jcav13p0744g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验