• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初次全髋关节置换术后脱位行闭合复位及外展支具治疗失败的危险因素识别

Identification of risk factors for treatment failure of closed reduction and abduction bracing after first-time total hip arthroplasty dislocation.

作者信息

Janz Viktor, Wassilew Georgi I, Putzier Michael, Kath Geraldine, Perka Carsten F

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Med Sci. 2021 Jan 8;18(1):133-140. doi: 10.5114/aoms/92214. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.5114/aoms/92214
PMID:35154534
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8826880/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

After a first-time total hip arthroplasty (THA) dislocation, a closed reduction followed by partial immobilization in an abduction brace is the recommended therapy. Despite modern abduction braces the success rate of conservative therapy is limited and evidence is scarce. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for failure of conservative treatment after THA dislocation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty-seven patients, with conservative treatment of a first-time dislocation of a primary or revision THA, were included in this retrospective cohort study. Success was defined as a stable THA for a minimum of 6 months. Re-dislocation, open reduction or revision was defined as failure. The following risk factors were analyzed: gender, age, body mass index (BMI), ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score, time of dislocation, head size, cup orientation, leg length, center of rotation and offset.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven percent of all patients experienced a re-dislocation, despite standardized conservative therapy. A BMI ≥ 25 kg/m, early THA dislocation, and low cup anteversion were associated with a statistically significantly higher risk for re-dislocation. None of the other risk-factors achieved statistical significance. A multifactorial risk-factor analysis was performed to assess whether a cup position outside of Lewinnek's safe zone in combination with gender, BMI and time to dislocation showed statistical significance for re-dislocation. Both BMI ≥ 25 kg/m and early dislocation showed a statistically higher failure rate. Cup position and gender were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

BMI ≥ 25 kg/m, early THA dislocation and low cup anteversion were identified as significant risk factors for failure of conservative treatment with an abduction brace for first-time THA dislocation.

摘要

引言

初次全髋关节置换术(THA)脱位后,推荐的治疗方法是先行闭合复位,然后使用外展支具进行部分固定。尽管有现代的外展支具,但保守治疗的成功率有限且证据不足。本研究的目的是确定THA脱位后保守治疗失败的危险因素。

材料与方法

本回顾性队列研究纳入了87例初次或翻修THA脱位后接受保守治疗的患者。成功定义为THA稳定至少6个月。再次脱位、切开复位或翻修定义为失败。分析了以下危险因素:性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分、脱位时间、股骨头大小、髋臼杯方向、腿长、旋转中心和偏心距。

结果

尽管采用了标准化的保守治疗,仍有67%的患者再次脱位。BMI≥25kg/m²、早期THA脱位和髋臼杯前倾角低与再次脱位的统计学显著高风险相关。其他危险因素均未达到统计学显著性。进行多因素危险因素分析,以评估髋臼杯位置超出Lewinnek安全区并结合性别、BMI和脱位时间对再次脱位是否具有统计学显著性。BMI≥25kg/m²和早期脱位均显示出统计学上较高的失败率。髋臼杯位置和性别不显著。

结论

BMI≥25kg/m²、早期THA脱位和髋臼杯前倾角低被确定为初次THA脱位使用外展支具保守治疗失败的显著危险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34b3/8826880/2d2848fccaa1/AMS-18-1-92214-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34b3/8826880/b8d95f93fd46/AMS-18-1-92214-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34b3/8826880/ca0ec315704b/AMS-18-1-92214-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34b3/8826880/6683eca4c1fa/AMS-18-1-92214-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34b3/8826880/be5938a88a32/AMS-18-1-92214-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34b3/8826880/d0e8eb36ad02/AMS-18-1-92214-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34b3/8826880/2d2848fccaa1/AMS-18-1-92214-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34b3/8826880/b8d95f93fd46/AMS-18-1-92214-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34b3/8826880/ca0ec315704b/AMS-18-1-92214-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34b3/8826880/6683eca4c1fa/AMS-18-1-92214-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34b3/8826880/be5938a88a32/AMS-18-1-92214-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34b3/8826880/d0e8eb36ad02/AMS-18-1-92214-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34b3/8826880/2d2848fccaa1/AMS-18-1-92214-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Identification of risk factors for treatment failure of closed reduction and abduction bracing after first-time total hip arthroplasty dislocation.初次全髋关节置换术后脱位行闭合复位及外展支具治疗失败的危险因素识别
Arch Med Sci. 2021 Jan 8;18(1):133-140. doi: 10.5114/aoms/92214. eCollection 2022.
2
Can a target zone safer than Lewinnek's safe zone be defined to prevent instability of total hip arthroplasties? Case-control study of 56 dislocated THA and 93 matched controls.能否定义一个比Lewinnek安全区更安全的目标区域来预防全髋关节置换术的不稳定?对56例髋关节置换术后脱位患者和93例匹配对照进行病例对照研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Sep;103(5):657-661. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
3
Is the cup orientation different in bilateral total hip arthroplasty with right-handed surgeons using posterolateral approach?对于使用后外侧入路的右利手外科医生进行双侧全髋关节置换时,髋臼杯的方向是否存在差异?
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 May 23;13(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0789-y.
4
Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty with a dual-mobility cup. Matched case-control study (16 cases vs. 48 controls).翻修全髋关节置换术后双动杯脱位的危险因素:配对病例对照研究(16 例与 48 例对照)。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Nov;105(7):1303-1309. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 May 29.
5
Can Surgeons Reduce the Risk for Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed Using the Posterolateral Approach?采用后外侧入路进行初次全髋关节置换术后,外科医生能否降低脱位风险?
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Oct;32(10):3141-3146. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.047. Epub 2017 May 4.
6
Efficacy of abduction bracing in the management of total hip arthroplasty dislocation.外展支具在全髋关节置换术后脱位管理中的疗效
J Arthroplasty. 2004 Sep;19(6):733-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.02.041.
7
The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA.全髋关节置换术中髋臼前倾角的安全区范围比倾斜角的安全区范围更窄。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):325-335. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000051.
8
Sagittal Imbalance Does Not Influence Cup Anteversion in Total Hip Arthroplasty Dislocations.矢状面失衡不影响全髋关节置换术脱位时髋臼前倾。
Clin Spine Surg. 2019 Feb;32(1):E31-E36. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000712.
9
What are the risk factors for dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty? A multicenter case-control study of 128 unstable and 438 stable hips.初次全髋关节置换术中脱位的危险因素有哪些?一项针对128例不稳定髋关节和438例稳定髋关节的多中心病例对照研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Sep;103(5):663-668. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
10
A critical analysis of radiographic factors in patients who develop dislocation after elective primary total hip arthroplasty.对择期初次全髋关节置换术后发生脱位患者的影像学因素进行的批判性分析。
Int Orthop. 2016 Apr;40(4):703-8. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-3022-1. Epub 2015 Oct 27.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Spino-Pelvic Alignment on Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes: A Critical Analysis of Current Evidence.脊柱骨盆对线对全髋关节置换术结局的影响:对当前证据的批判性分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1606-1616. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.021. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
2
The Current Knowledge on Spinopelvic Mobility.脊柱骨盆活动度的当前知识。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jan;33(1):291-296. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.013. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
3
Acetabular cup position and risk of dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty.初次全髋关节置换术中髋臼杯位置与脱位风险
Acta Orthop. 2017 Feb;88(1):10-17. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1251255. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
4
Dual-mobility or Constrained Liners Are More Effective Than Preoperative Bariatric Surgery in Prevention of THA Dislocation.双动型或限制性内衬在预防全髋关节置换术脱位方面比术前减肥手术更有效。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Oct;474(10):2202-10. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4859-3.
5
A critical analysis of radiographic factors in patients who develop dislocation after elective primary total hip arthroplasty.对择期初次全髋关节置换术后发生脱位患者的影像学因素进行的批判性分析。
Int Orthop. 2016 Apr;40(4):703-8. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-3022-1. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
6
Redefining the Acetabular Component Safe Zone for Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty.重新定义后入路全髋关节置换术中髋臼假体安全区域
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Feb;31(2):506-11. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.010. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
7
What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position.什么安全区?绝大多数脱位的全髋关节置换术(THA)髋臼组件位置处于Lewinnek安全区内。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Feb;474(2):386-91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4432-5.
8
Anterior and Anterolateral Approaches for THA Are Associated With Lower Dislocation Risk Without Higher Revision Risk.全髋关节置换术的前路和前外侧入路与较低的脱位风险相关,且翻修风险不高。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3401-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4230-0.
9
The effect of orientation of the acetabular component on outcome following total hip arthroplasty with small diameter hard-on-soft bearings.小直径硬对软轴承全髋关节置换术中髋臼组件的方向对手术结果的影响。
Bone Joint J. 2015 Feb;97-B(2):164-72. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B2.34294.
10
Cup position alone does not predict risk of dislocation after hip arthroplasty.单纯髋臼位置并不能预测髋关节置换术后脱位的风险。
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Jan;30(1):109-13. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Jul 11.