Ma Tengfei, Wiggins Chad C, Kornatowski Breanna M, Hailat Ra'ed S, Clayburn Andrew J, Guo Winston L, Johnson Patrick W, Senefeld Jonathon W, Klassen Stephen A, Baker Sarah E, Bruno Katelyn A, Fairweather DeLisa, Wright R Scott, Carter Rickey E, Li Chenxi, Joyner Michael J, Paneth Nigel S
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 26;8:707895. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.707895. eCollection 2021.
Treatment of patients with COVID-19 using convalescent plasma from recently recovered patients has been shown to be safe, but the time course of change in clinical status following plasma transfusion in relation to baseline disease severity has not yet been described. We analyzed short, descriptive daily reports of patient status in 7,180 hospitalized recipients of COVID-19 convalescent plasma in the Mayo Clinic Expanded Access Program. We assessed, from the day following transfusion, whether the patient was categorized by his or her physician as better, worse or unchanged compared to the day before, and whether, on the reporting day, the patient received mechanical ventilation, was in the ICU, had died or had been discharged. Most patients improved following transfusion, but clinical improvement was most notable in mild to moderately ill patients. Patients classified as severely ill upon enrollment improved, but not as rapidly, while patients classified as critically ill/end-stage and patients on ventilators showed worsening of disease status even after treatment with convalescent plasma. Patients age 80 and over showed little or no clinical improvement following transfusion. Clinical status at the time of convalescent plasma treatment and age appear to be the primary factors in determining the therapeutic effectiveness of COVID-19 convalescent plasma among hospitalized patients.
使用近期康复患者的康复期血浆治疗新冠病毒肺炎(COVID-19)患者已被证明是安全的,但输血后临床状态相对于基线疾病严重程度的变化时间过程尚未得到描述。我们分析了梅奥诊所扩大准入计划中7180名住院接受COVID-19康复期血浆治疗患者的简短描述性每日病情报告。从输血后的第二天起,我们评估患者的医生将其分类为与前一天相比病情好转、恶化或无变化,以及在报告日患者是否接受机械通气、是否在重症监护病房(ICU)、是否死亡或已出院。大多数患者输血后病情改善,但临床改善在轻至中度患者中最为显著。入院时被分类为重症的患者有所改善,但速度不快,而被分类为危重症/终末期患者和使用呼吸机的患者即使在接受康复期血浆治疗后病情仍恶化。80岁及以上患者输血后几乎没有或没有临床改善。康复期血浆治疗时的临床状态和年龄似乎是决定住院患者中COVID-19康复期血浆治疗效果的主要因素。