Beesley Jeremy, Davey Christopher J, Elliott David B
Bradford School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 May;42(3):619-632. doi: 10.1111/opo.12961. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
To investigate non-tolerance cases from several UK practices to determine their likely causes and how they might have been avoided.
Patient complaint and refraction data were collected from non-tolerance recheck examinations. For one practice, clinical data were also collected retrospectively to investigate the quality of the eye examinations.
Data for 279 rechecks were gathered from 10 practices and a recheck frequency of 2.3% was found. The mean patient age was 60 (SD 16) years, with cylinder changes responsible for 38% of prescription-related causes of rechecks, overplusing or underminusing 26%, and underplusing or overminusing just 11%. An assessment of 242 recheck corrections found that 40% were unsatisfactory (e.g., failed to address initial or recheck symptoms, N = 45) and retrospective analysis of 217 case records showed many limitations (e.g., 61% or 28% recorded no uncorrected or habitual visual acuity (VA) at either initial examination or recheck).
Given that overplus-underminus was a much bigger proportion of prescription-related cases than overminus-underplus (26% vs. 11%), the refraction mantra of "maximum plus for maximum VA" should be balanced by increased teaching of the problems of overplusing and underminusing, and the use of prescribing guidelines. In addition, continuing professional development regarding the basics of the recheck examination, refraction, visual acuity and prism determination is needed. Changes of oblique cylinders should be carefully considered in older patients as this is a common cause of non-tolerance. In addition, if the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" and related maxims had been applied to all patients who were asymptomatic at the original examination, one third of all non-tolerance cases could have been avoided. Finally, it would seem appropriate for practices to develop a system to deal better with non-tolerance cases. Perhaps an experienced clinician should examine all patients with non-tolerance and provide feedback to the original clinician.
调查英国多家医疗机构的不耐受病例,以确定其可能原因以及如何避免这些情况。
从不耐受复查检查中收集患者投诉和验光数据。对于一家医疗机构,还回顾性收集临床数据以调查眼部检查的质量。
从10家医疗机构收集了279次复查的数据,发现复查频率为2.3%。患者平均年龄为60(标准差16)岁,柱镜变化是复查中38%与处方相关原因的成因,过矫或欠矫占26%,而欠矫或过矫仅占11%。对242次复查矫正的评估发现,40%的矫正结果不理想(例如,未能解决初次检查或复查时的症状,N = 45),对217份病例记录的回顾性分析显示存在许多局限性(例如,61%或28%在初次检查或复查时未记录未矫正或习惯视力(VA))。
鉴于过矫 - 欠矫在与处方相关病例中所占比例远高于欠矫 - 过矫(26%对11%),“最大正镜度以获得最大视力”的验光原则应通过加强对过矫和欠矫问题的教学以及使用处方指南来加以平衡。此外,需要就复查检查、验光、视力和棱镜测定的基础知识进行持续专业发展。老年患者应仔细考虑斜柱镜的变化,因为这是不耐受的常见原因。此外,如果将“如果没坏,就别修”及相关准则应用于初次检查时无症状的所有患者,那么所有不耐受病例中有三分之一是可以避免的。最后,医疗机构似乎应建立一个更好地处理不耐受病例的系统。也许应由经验丰富的临床医生检查所有不耐受患者并向原临床医生提供反馈。