Arumugam Vijayalakshmi, Singh Sumeer, Ramani Krishna Kumar
Elite School of Optometry, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Optometry, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Clin Exp Optom. 2018 Mar;101(2):237-242. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12619. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
To determine the spectacle reassessment rates of dissatisfied patients returning to the optical services department of a tertiary eye centre in India over a period of six years.
A total of 169,567 spectacles were dispensed from the optical services department between January 2010 and December 2015. The spectacle reassessment forms of dissatisfied patients who returned to the optical services department with their spectacles were analysed.
A total of 797 spectacle reassessment forms were analysed. The overall spectacle reassessment rate during the study period was found to be 0.5% (95% CI: 0.467-0.472). The mean age of patients returning back for spectacle reassessment was 48 years (SD 19.9, range 3-97 years). Error in refractive correction measurement was found to be the most common reason for spectacle reassessment (54.7%), followed by dispensing error (21.1%), documentation errors while writing the prescription from the medical records in the tertiary eye care centre (12.7%), transcription error occurring at the optical services department (10.8%) and ocular pathologies (0.8%). No statistically significant difference was observed in the year-wise spectacle reassessment rates during the study period (p = 0.14).
The frequency of spectacle reassessment rate in a tertiary eye care centre was low, with errors in measuring refractive errors contributing the most to the reassessment and reorder of spectacles.
确定在六年时间里,印度一家三级眼科中心配镜服务部门中,对配镜不满意而返回的患者的配镜重新评估率。
2010年1月至2015年12月期间,配镜服务部门共配发了169,567副眼镜。对带着眼镜返回配镜服务部门的不满意患者的配镜重新评估表格进行了分析。
共分析了797份配镜重新评估表格。研究期间的总体配镜重新评估率为0.5%(95%置信区间:0.467 - 0.472)。返回进行配镜重新评估的患者的平均年龄为48岁(标准差19.9,范围3 - 97岁)。屈光矫正测量误差被发现是配镜重新评估最常见的原因(54.7%),其次是配镜误差(21.1%)、在三级眼科护理中心从病历书写处方时的记录错误(12.7%)、配镜服务部门发生的转录错误(10.8%)和眼部疾病(0.8%)。在研究期间,按年份划分的配镜重新评估率未观察到统计学上的显著差异(p = 0.14)。
三级眼科护理中心的配镜重新评估率较低,屈光误差测量错误是配镜重新评估和重新配镜的最大原因。