Suppr超能文献

六年期间在三级眼科护理中心进行眼镜重新评估的原因。

Reasons for spectacle reassessment in a tertiary eye care centre over a period of six years.

作者信息

Arumugam Vijayalakshmi, Singh Sumeer, Ramani Krishna Kumar

机构信息

Elite School of Optometry, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Department of Optometry, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Clin Exp Optom. 2018 Mar;101(2):237-242. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12619. Epub 2017 Nov 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To determine the spectacle reassessment rates of dissatisfied patients returning to the optical services department of a tertiary eye centre in India over a period of six years.

METHODS

A total of 169,567 spectacles were dispensed from the optical services department between January 2010 and December 2015. The spectacle reassessment forms of dissatisfied patients who returned to the optical services department with their spectacles were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 797 spectacle reassessment forms were analysed. The overall spectacle reassessment rate during the study period was found to be 0.5% (95% CI: 0.467-0.472). The mean age of patients returning back for spectacle reassessment was 48 years (SD 19.9, range 3-97 years). Error in refractive correction measurement was found to be the most common reason for spectacle reassessment (54.7%), followed by dispensing error (21.1%), documentation errors while writing the prescription from the medical records in the tertiary eye care centre (12.7%), transcription error occurring at the optical services department (10.8%) and ocular pathologies (0.8%). No statistically significant difference was observed in the year-wise spectacle reassessment rates during the study period (p = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of spectacle reassessment rate in a tertiary eye care centre was low, with errors in measuring refractive errors contributing the most to the reassessment and reorder of spectacles.

摘要

背景

确定在六年时间里,印度一家三级眼科中心配镜服务部门中,对配镜不满意而返回的患者的配镜重新评估率。

方法

2010年1月至2015年12月期间,配镜服务部门共配发了169,567副眼镜。对带着眼镜返回配镜服务部门的不满意患者的配镜重新评估表格进行了分析。

结果

共分析了797份配镜重新评估表格。研究期间的总体配镜重新评估率为0.5%(95%置信区间:0.467 - 0.472)。返回进行配镜重新评估的患者的平均年龄为48岁(标准差19.9,范围3 - 97岁)。屈光矫正测量误差被发现是配镜重新评估最常见的原因(54.7%),其次是配镜误差(21.1%)、在三级眼科护理中心从病历书写处方时的记录错误(12.7%)、配镜服务部门发生的转录错误(10.8%)和眼部疾病(0.8%)。在研究期间,按年份划分的配镜重新评估率未观察到统计学上的显著差异(p = 0.14)。

结论

三级眼科护理中心的配镜重新评估率较低,屈光误差测量错误是配镜重新评估和重新配镜的最大原因。

相似文献

1
Reasons for spectacle reassessment in a tertiary eye care centre over a period of six years.
Clin Exp Optom. 2018 Mar;101(2):237-242. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12619. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
2
Prescribing spectacles: reasons for failure of spectacle lens acceptance.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2006 Jan;26(1):111-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00351.x.
3
Spectacle-wear compliance in school children in Concepción Chile.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;21(6):362-9. doi: 10.3109/09286586.2014.975823. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
5
A randomized, clinical trial evaluating ready-made and custom spectacles delivered via a school-based screening program in China.
Ophthalmology. 2009 Oct;116(10):1839-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.04.004. Epub 2009 Jul 9.
7
Spectacle compliance amongst rural secondary school children in Pune district, India.
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jan-Feb;61(1):8-12. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.99996.
8
Visual function after correction of distance refractive error with ready-made and custom spectacles: a randomized clinical trial.
Ophthalmology. 2012 Oct;119(10):2014-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.03.051. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
10
Spectacle non-tolerance in clinical practice - a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021 May;41(3):610-622. doi: 10.1111/opo.12796. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
What are the causes of non-tolerance to new spectacles and how can they be avoided?
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022 May;42(3):619-632. doi: 10.1111/opo.12961. Epub 2022 Feb 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验