Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 May;80(5):798-813. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2021.12.016. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
Metallic temporomandibular joint replacement (TMJR) systems vary depending on design, material composition, and manufacturing methods such as casting, forging, and additive manufacturing. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to measure the association between manufacturing process of TMJR systems in terms of microstructure and electrochemical properties.
The sample was composed of new or surgically retrieved TMJ replacement devices of either titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) or cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (CoCrMo) alloy from 8 different manufacturers. The primary predictor variable was alloy type, according to its manufacturing process (wrought, cast, additively manufactured [AM]). The primary outcome variables were 1) microstructure (grain size, aspect ratio, and phase content) and 2) corrosion potential and current, polarization resistance, and capacitance. Differences between alloy groups were determined by t tests, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney tests.
We demonstrated that the TMJR CoCrMo and Ti6Al4V alloy microstructures can vary broadly within American Society for Testing and Materials specifications, where the components made of Ti6Al4V had 3 types of microstructures (equiaxial, bimodal, and martensitic) out of 10 samples, and the components made of CoCrMo had 2 types of microstructure (equiaxial and dendritic) out of 16 samples. Some CoCrMo alloys exhibited preferential corrosion sites, while wrought Ti6Al4V alloys trended toward a superior corrosion behavior (corrosion rate: 2 × 10 A/cm, polarization resistance: 5,000,000 kΩcm, and capacitance: 10 μSs) compared with AM alloys (39 × 10 A/cm, 1676 kΩcm, 36 μSs, respectively), where 4 samples of each group were tested and repeated 5 times. Among four AM devices, two exhibited a significantly inferior corrosion behavior.
Although AM is an exciting emerging new technology that allows manufacturing of custom-made TMJR, their corrosion behavior is still inferior in comparison to that of traditional wrought alloys. Preventing corrosion is crucial because it can cause surface defects that may lead to implant fracture.
金属颞下颌关节置换(TMJR)系统的设计、材料组成和制造方法(如铸造、锻造和增材制造)各不相同。因此,本研究的目的是测量 TMJR 系统制造工艺(微观结构和电化学性能)之间的关联。
样本由来自 8 家不同制造商的新的或手术取出的钛合金(Ti6Al4V)或钴铬钼(CoCrMo)合金 TMJ 置换装置组成。主要预测变量是根据其制造工艺(锻造、铸造、增材制造[AM])的合金类型。主要结果变量为 1)微观结构(晶粒尺寸、纵横比和相含量)和 2)腐蚀电位和电流、极化电阻和电容。通过 t 检验、Kruskal-Wallis 和 Mann-Whitney 检验确定合金组之间的差异。
我们证明,TMJR CoCrMo 和 Ti6Al4V 合金的微观结构在 ASTM 规格范围内可能存在广泛差异,其中 10 个样本中有 3 种 Ti6Al4V 制成的微观结构(等轴、双峰和马氏体),16 个样本中有 2 种 CoCrMo 制成的微观结构(等轴和树枝状)。一些 CoCrMo 合金表现出优先腐蚀部位,而锻造 Ti6Al4V 合金的腐蚀行为呈上升趋势(腐蚀速率:2×10 A/cm,极化电阻:5000000 kΩcm,电容:10 μSs)优于 AM 合金(分别为 39×10 A/cm、1676 kΩcm、36 μSs),每组 4 个样本重复测试 5 次。在四个 AM 装置中,有两个装置的腐蚀行为明显较差。
尽管 AM 是一种令人兴奋的新兴新技术,允许制造定制的 TMJR,但与传统锻造合金相比,其腐蚀行为仍较差。防止腐蚀至关重要,因为它会导致表面缺陷,可能导致植入物断裂。