Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A..
Arthroscopy. 2022 Aug;38(8):2493-2503. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.01.045. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
To (1) determine the effect of severe patella alta on lateral patellar displacement after medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction and medial quadriceps tendon-femoral ligament (MQTFL) reconstruction and (2) determine whether lateral displacement significantly differs between MPFL and MQTFL reconstructions in the setting of severe patella alta (Caton-Deschamps Index [CDI] of 1.6).
Eight cadaveric specimens were included. High-tensile strength suture was used to create a model of adjustable patellar height. Patellar height was set using fluoroscopy to CDI ratios of 1.0 (normal) and 1.6 (alta). Specimens underwent testing (1) with MPFL reconstruction, (2) with MQTFL reconstruction, and (3) in a medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC)-deficient control state, in randomized order, at both CDI settings: 1.0 and 1.6. Lateral patellar translation was measured at 0°, 10°, 20°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion with 10 N of laterally directed load.
At a CDI of 1.6, MPFL reconstruction showed significantly lower lateral displacement than MQTFL reconstruction at 0° and 20°. When compared with MPFC-deficient controls at a CDI of 1.6, MPFL reconstruction showed significantly lower displacement at 0° and 20° whereas MQTFL reconstruction was not significantly different at any degree of flexion.
In the setting of severe patella alta (CDI of 1.6), MPFL reconstruction results in less lateral patellar displacement than MQTFL reconstruction at 0° and 20° of knee flexion. At higher flexion angles (≥30°), there is no difference between the 2 reconstruction techniques and the CDI no longer has an effect. At a CDI of 1.0, MPFL reconstruction shows lower displacement than MQTFL reconstruction in full extension only. Surgeons performing MPFC reconstruction should evaluate patients for patella alta and consider patellar height when deciding on the reconstruction technique.
This study suggests that MQTFL reconstruction may be less stable than MPFL reconstruction in the setting of patella alta, without other known pathoanatomic factors, at early knee flexion angles. Patellar height should be considered when choosing the appropriate reconstruction technique in the absence of a distalization procedure.
(1)确定严重髌股高位(Caton-Deschamps 指数 [CDI] 为 1.6)对内侧髌股韧带(MPFL)重建和内侧髌腱-股韧带(MQTFL)重建后外侧髌骨位移的影响,(2)确定在严重髌股高位(CDI 为 1.6)时,MPFL 和 MQTFL 重建之间的外侧位移是否存在显著差异。
纳入 8 具尸体标本。使用高强度缝线制作可调节髌骨高度的模型。使用透视法将髌骨高度设定为 CDI 比值为 1.0(正常)和 1.6(高位)。标本按 MPFL 重建、MQTFL 重建和内侧髌股复合(MPFC)缺陷对照状态的顺序随机进行测试,在 CDI 设置为 1.0 和 1.6 时,在 0°、10°、20°、30°、45°、60°和 90°的膝关节屈曲位下,施加 10 N 的侧向负荷,测量外侧髌骨平移。
在 CDI 为 1.6 时,MPFL 重建的外侧髌骨位移明显低于 MQTFL 重建的 0°和 20°。与 CDI 为 1.6 的 MPFC 缺陷对照组相比,MPFL 重建的 0°和 20°的位移明显较低,而 MQTFL 重建在任何屈曲角度均无显著差异。
在严重髌股高位(CDI 为 1.6)的情况下,MPFL 重建在 0°和 20°的膝关节屈曲时比 MQTFL 重建的外侧髌骨位移更小。在更高的屈曲角度(≥30°),两种重建技术之间没有差异,CDI 不再有影响。在 CDI 为 1.0 时,MPFL 重建仅在完全伸展时的位移小于 MQTFL 重建。进行 MPFC 重建的外科医生应评估髌股高位患者,并在决定重建技术时考虑髌骨高度。
本研究表明,在无其他已知病理解剖因素的情况下,在髌股高位时,与 MPFL 重建相比,MQTFL 重建在早期膝关节屈曲角度时可能不太稳定。在没有远移术的情况下,选择合适的重建技术时应考虑髌骨高度。