• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于即将施行的世界卫生组织国际系统,对巴氏系统在胰腺细胞学诊断中的性能进行的系统评价。

Diagnostic Performance of Pancreatic Cytology with the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System: A Systematic Review, before Shifting into the Upcoming WHO International System.

机构信息

School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus.

Institute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jan 31;23(3):1650. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031650.

DOI:10.3390/ijms23031650
PMID:35163571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8835850/
Abstract

The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) reporting system classifies pancreatobiliary samples into six categories (I-VI), providing guidance for personalized management. As the World Health Organization (WHO) has been preparing an updated reporting system for pancreatobiliary cytopathology, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the risk of malignancy (ROM) of each PSC category, also the sensitivity and specificity of pancreatic FNA cytology using the current PSC system. Five databases were investigated with a predefined search algorithm. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select the eligible studies for subsequent data extraction. A study quality assessment was also performed. Eight studies were included in the qualitative analysis. The ROM of the PSC categories I, II, III, IV, V, VI were in the ranges of 8-50%, 0-40%, 28-100%, 0-31%, 82-100%, and 97-100%, respectively. Notably, the ROM IVB ("neoplastic-benign") subcategory showed a 0% ROM. Four of the included studies reported separately the ROMs for the IVO subcategory ("neoplastic-other"; its overall ROM ranged from 0 to 34%) with low (LGA) and high-grade atypia (HGA). ROM for LGA ranged from 4.3 to 19%, whereas ROM for HGA from 64 to 95.2%. When the subcategory IVO with HGA was considered as cytologically positive, together with the categories V and VI, there was a higher sensitivity of pancreatic cytology, at minimal expense of the specificity. Evidence suggests the proposed WHO international system changes-shifting the IVB entities into the "benign/negative for malignancy" category and establishing two new categories, the "pancreatic neoplasm, low-risk/grade" and "pancreatic neoplasm, high-risk/grade"-could stratify pancreatic neoplasms more effectively than the current PSC system.

摘要

巴氏细胞学学会(PSC)报告系统将胰胆样本分为六类(I-VI),为个性化管理提供指导。由于世界卫生组织(WHO)一直在准备更新的胰胆细胞学报告系统,本系统评价旨在评估每个 PSC 类别的恶性肿瘤风险(ROM),以及当前 PSC 系统下胰腺细针抽吸细胞学的敏感性和特异性。使用预定义的搜索算法调查了五个数据库。应用纳入和排除标准选择合格的研究进行后续数据提取。还进行了研究质量评估。八项研究纳入定性分析。PSC 类别 I、II、III、IV、V、VI 的 ROM 范围分别为 8-50%、0-40%、28-100%、0-31%、82-100%和 97-100%。值得注意的是,IVB 亚类(“肿瘤-良性”)的 ROM 为 0%。纳入的四项研究分别报告了 IVO 亚类(“肿瘤-其他”)的 ROM(其总体 ROM 范围为 0 至 34%),其低级别不典型增生(LGA)和高级别不典型增生(HGA)的 ROM 分别为 4.3%至 19%,而 HGA 的 ROM 为 64%至 95.2%。当考虑到具有 HGA 的亚类 IVO 作为细胞学阳性,并与类别 V 和 VI 一起时,胰腺细胞学的敏感性更高,特异性损失最小。证据表明,拟议的 WHO 国际系统变化——将 IVB 实体转移到“良性/无恶性肿瘤”类别,并建立两个新类别,即“胰腺肿瘤,低风险/低级别”和“胰腺肿瘤,高风险/高级别”——可以比当前的 PSC 系统更有效地对胰腺肿瘤进行分层。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96d1/8835850/07504a445ac0/ijms-23-01650-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96d1/8835850/0d29a52e05ac/ijms-23-01650-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96d1/8835850/07504a445ac0/ijms-23-01650-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96d1/8835850/0d29a52e05ac/ijms-23-01650-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96d1/8835850/07504a445ac0/ijms-23-01650-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Diagnostic Performance of Pancreatic Cytology with the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System: A Systematic Review, before Shifting into the Upcoming WHO International System.基于即将施行的世界卫生组织国际系统,对巴氏系统在胰腺细胞学诊断中的性能进行的系统评价。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jan 31;23(3):1650. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031650.
2
Update on risk stratification in the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology categories: 3-Year, prospective, single-institution experience.在 Papanicolaou 社会细胞学报告系统中进行风险分层的最新进展:3 年前瞻性、单机构经验。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2020 Jan;128(1):29-35. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22199. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
3
Risk of malignancy associated with diagnostic categories of the proposed World Health Organization International System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology.与世界卫生组织拟议的胰腺胆管细胞病理学国际报告系统诊断类别相关的恶性肿瘤风险
Cancer Cytopathol. 2022 Mar;130(3):195-201. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22514. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
4
Risk of malignancy and overall survival associated with the diagnostic categories in the World Health Organization Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology.在世界卫生组织报告系统中,与胰腺胆道细胞学诊断类别相关的恶性肿瘤风险和总生存。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2024 Oct;132(10):635-645. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22880. Epub 2024 Jun 30.
5
Risk of malignancy associated with the diagnostic categories proposed by the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology for pancreaticobiliary specimens: An institutional experience.帕帕尼科拉乌细胞病理学协会针对胰胆标本提出的诊断分类相关的恶性肿瘤风险:一项机构经验。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2022 Feb;50(2):49-56. doi: 10.1002/dc.24910. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
6
The WHO system versus the Papanicolaou society of cytopathology system for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytology for risk stratification-which is better?世界卫生组织系统与巴氏细胞学学会系统在报告胰胆细胞学用于危险分层方面的比较——哪个更好?
Diagn Cytopathol. 2024 Mar;52(3):145-155. doi: 10.1002/dc.25258. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
7
Risk of Malignancy Using the Diagnostic Categories Proposed by the World Health Organization International System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology.采用世界卫生组织国际胰腺胆道细胞学报告系统提出的诊断类别诊断恶性肿瘤的风险。
Acta Cytol. 2022;66(6):475-485. doi: 10.1159/000525276. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
8
Risk of malignancy in the categories of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology system for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytology.巴氏细胞病理学协会胰腺胆管细胞学报告系统各分类中的恶性风险。
J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2019 May-Jun;8(3):120-127. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
9
Cytologic categorization of pancreatic neoplastic mucinous cysts with an assessment of the risk of malignancy: A retrospective study based on the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology guidelines.胰腺肿瘤性黏液性囊肿的细胞学分类及恶性风险评估:一项基于帕潘icolaou细胞病理学协会指南的回顾性研究
Cancer Cytopathol. 2016 Apr;124(4):285-93. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21657. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
10
Comparison of risk of malignancy and predictive value of diagnostic categories defined by Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology system and WHO reporting system for pancreaticobiliary cytopathology in solid pancreatic lesions.帕潘尼古拉乌细胞病理学协会系统和世界卫生组织报告系统对实性胰腺病变中胰胆细胞病理学所定义的诊断类别之恶性风险及预测价值的比较
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep 26;17:17562848241271958. doi: 10.1177/17562848241271958. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
The World Health Organization System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology: Standardized Categories and Practical Approaches to Pancreatic Lesions.世界卫生组织胰腺胆管细胞病理学报告系统:胰腺病变的标准化分类及实用方法
J Clin Transl Pathol. 2024 Sep;4(3):122-135. doi: 10.14218/jctp.2024.00034. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
2
Diagnostic Value of Cytology in Pancreatic Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration: Accuracy in Common Epithelial Pancreatobiliary Tumors and the Role of Cell Block Analysis.细胞学检查在胰腺内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检中的诊断价值:常见上皮性胰胆肿瘤的诊断准确性及细胞块分析的作用
Iran J Pathol. 2025;20(1):98-107. doi: 10.30699/ijp.2024.2036290.3329. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Risk of malignancy associated with diagnostic categories of the proposed World Health Organization International System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology.与世界卫生组织拟议的胰腺胆管细胞病理学国际报告系统诊断类别相关的恶性肿瘤风险
Cancer Cytopathol. 2022 Mar;130(3):195-201. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22514. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
2
Atypical cells in fine needle aspiration biopsies of pancreas: Causes, work-up, and recommendations for management.胰腺细针抽吸活检中的非典型细胞:病因、检查及处理建议。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2022 Apr;50(4):196-207. doi: 10.1002/dc.24848. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
3
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
Comparison of risk of malignancy and predictive value of diagnostic categories defined by Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology system and WHO reporting system for pancreaticobiliary cytopathology in solid pancreatic lesions.
帕潘尼古拉乌细胞病理学协会系统和世界卫生组织报告系统对实性胰腺病变中胰胆细胞病理学所定义的诊断类别之恶性风险及预测价值的比较
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep 26;17:17562848241271958. doi: 10.1177/17562848241271958. eCollection 2024.
4
Diagnostic Assessment of Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Pancreas: A Comparison between Liquid-Based Preparation and Conventional Smear.内镜超声引导下细针穿刺细胞学检查在胰腺疾病中的诊断评估:液基制片与传统涂片的对比研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jun 2;60(6):930. doi: 10.3390/medicina60060930.
5
Comprehensive Genomic Studies on the Cell Blocks of Pancreatic Cancer.胰腺癌细胞块的综合基因组研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Apr 26;14(9):906. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14090906.
6
Minimally invasive biopsy-based diagnostics in support of precision cancer medicine.基于微创活检的诊断支持精准癌症医学。
Mol Oncol. 2024 Nov;18(11):2612-2628. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.13640. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
7
Risk Factors and Interpretation of Inconclusive Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions.内镜超声引导下细针穿刺活检在实性胰腺病变诊断中不确定结果的危险因素及解读
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Sep 1;13(17):2841. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13172841.
8
The Use of the International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy.国际细胞学会横滨系统在乳腺细针穿刺活检报告中的应用。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2023 Feb 1;159(2):138-145. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqac132.
9
Risk of Malignancy Using the Diagnostic Categories Proposed by the World Health Organization International System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology.采用世界卫生组织国际胰腺胆道细胞学报告系统提出的诊断类别诊断恶性肿瘤的风险。
Acta Cytol. 2022;66(6):475-485. doi: 10.1159/000525276. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
Int J Surg. 2021 Apr;88:105906. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
4
Cytology adds value to monoclonal antibody Das-1 testing for detection of high-risk pancreatic cysts.细胞学为检测高危胰腺囊肿的单克隆抗体Das-1检测增添价值。
J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2021 May-Jun;10(3):249-254. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2021.01.002. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
5
The benefits of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for reporting pancreatobiliary cytology: A 2-year review from a single academic institution.巴氏细胞学学会系统报告胰胆细胞学的优势:来自单一学术机构的 2 年回顾。
Cytopathology. 2021 Mar;32(2):227-232. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12949. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
6
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytologic Evaluation of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm and Mucinous Cystic Neoplasms of Pancreas.内镜超声引导下细针抽吸细胞学评估胰腺内导管乳头状黏液性肿瘤和黏液性囊性肿瘤。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2020 Sep 8;154(4):559-570. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa079.
7
Experience and future perspectives on the use of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Terminology System for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytology.使用帕潘尼古拉乌细胞病理学协会术语系统报告胰胆管细胞学的经验与未来展望。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2020 May;48(5):494-498. doi: 10.1002/dc.24393. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
8
Evaluation of metastases to the pancreas with fine needle aspiration: A case series from a single centre with review of the literature.经细针抽吸评估胰腺转移瘤:来自单个中心的病例系列及文献复习。
Cytopathology. 2020 Mar;31(2):96-105. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12793. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
9
EUS-FNA diagnosis of pancreatic serous cystadenoma with the aid of cell blocks and α-inhibin immunochemistry: A case series.借助细胞块和α-抑制素免疫化学技术的EUS-FNA诊断胰腺浆液性囊腺瘤:病例系列
Diagn Cytopathol. 2020 Mar;48(3):239-243. doi: 10.1002/dc.24348. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
10
Update on risk stratification in the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology categories: 3-Year, prospective, single-institution experience.在 Papanicolaou 社会细胞学报告系统中进行风险分层的最新进展:3 年前瞻性、单机构经验。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2020 Jan;128(1):29-35. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22199. Epub 2019 Nov 13.