Durner Jürgen, Schrickel Klaus, Watts David C, Becker Marc, Draenert Miriam E
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, LMU Munich Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Goethestr. 70, 80336 Munich, Germany; Laboratory Becker and Colleagues, Führichstr. 70, 81671 München, Germany.
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Im Steingrund 4-6, 63303 Dreieich, Germany.
Dent Mater. 2022 Mar;38(3):489-507. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.02.001. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
To compare elutable substances directly released from bulk-fill (BF) resin-based composites (RBCs) with indirect elution from teeth restored with a BF composite. In addition to (co)monomers, the analytical focus was on other potentially toxic ingredients or impurities. Furthermore, the barrier function of the residual dentin/adhesive layer was studied.
Six BF-RBC materials were studied. For each material subgroup, ten human third molar teeth with standard Class-I occlusal cavities were prepared and provided with a three-step adhesive system and the respective composite restoration (tooth groups). Same sized control specimens of the restorative material were prepared ('direct BF-RBC' groups). Each specimen was placed in an elution chamber such that the elution media (ethanol/water, 3:1) only contacted the tooth root or ¾ height of each specimen. They were incubated at 37 °C for up to 7 d. Samples of eluate were taken after 1, 2, 4 and 7 d and were analysed by high-temperature gas chromatography/mass spectrometry.
(Co)monomers such as Bisphenol A ethoxylate dimethacrylate (bisEMA) or tetraethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEEGDMA) were mostly found in the eluates of the 'direct BF-RBC' groups in statistically significantly greater amounts than in the eluates of the 'tooth groups'. The residual dentin and/or adhesive layers acted as a diffusion barrier for most of the substances except for triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) or diethylene glycol dimethacrylate (DEGDMA). For TEGDMA up to 3 orders of magnitude more were found in the 'tooth groups' compared to the 'direct BF-RBC' groups, evidently released by the adhesive system. Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) including TINUVIN® 328 and BPA were found mainly in the eluates of 'direct BF-RBC' groups.
For estimation of biocompatibility, a total system, specifically BF-RBC + adhesive, should always be investigated since individual considerations, such as only elution from a BF-RBC, do not correctly reflect the total clinical situation. The focus of elution tests should not only be on the co(monomers), but also on other ingredients or impurities that may be released.
比较大容量充填(BF)树脂基复合材料(RBC)直接释放的可洗脱物质与用BF复合材料修复的牙齿间接洗脱的物质。除了(共)单体外,分析重点还包括其他潜在有毒成分或杂质。此外,还研究了剩余牙本质/粘结层的屏障功能。
研究了六种BF-RBC材料。对于每个材料亚组,制备了十颗具有标准I类咬合洞的人类第三磨牙,并配备了三步粘结系统和相应的复合修复体(牙齿组)。制备了相同尺寸的修复材料对照样本(“直接BF-RBC”组)。将每个样本置于洗脱室中,使洗脱介质(乙醇/水,3:1)仅接触每个样本的牙根或3/4高度。在37°C下孵育长达7天。在第1、2、4和7天采集洗脱液样本,并通过高温气相色谱/质谱分析。
双酚A乙氧基二甲基丙烯酸酯(bisEMA)或四甘醇二甲基丙烯酸酯(TEEGDMA)等(共)单体在“直接BF-RBC”组的洗脱液中含量大多在统计学上显著高于“牙齿组”的洗脱液。除了三甘醇二甲基丙烯酸酯(TEGDMA)或二甘醇二甲基丙烯酸酯(DEGDMA)外,剩余牙本质和/或粘结层对大多数物质起到了扩散屏障的作用。与“直接BF-RBC”组相比,“牙齿组”中发现的TEGDMA多了高达3个数量级,显然是由粘结系统释放的。包括TINUVIN® 328和双酚A在内的高关注度物质(SVHC)主要存在于“直接BF-RBC”组的洗脱液中。
为了评估生物相容性,应始终研究整个系统,特别是BF-RBC + 粘结剂,因为仅考虑单个因素,如仅从BF-RBC洗脱,并不能正确反映整个临床情况。洗脱试验的重点不仅应放在(共)单体上,还应放在可能释放的其他成分或杂质上。