Suppr超能文献

间歇性强制通气系统的比较

A comparison of intermittent mandatory ventilation systems.

作者信息

Hillman K, Friedlos J, Davey A

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1986 May;14(5):499-502. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198605000-00014.

Abstract

Many recent ventilators used in the ICU have a demand valve for intermittent gas flow. While demand systems conserve gas flow, they do not appear to be as well tolerated by patients as are continuous flow systems. Using a mechanical model to simulate a patient's spontaneous breathing efforts, we tested nine common ventilators in the intermittent mode. Their sensitivity varied from -2.0 to -0.2 cm H2O and the total delay time from 19 to 92 msec. The initial inspiratory resistance varied between 0.03 and 0.10 cm H2O/L X min and initial flow was between 2.5 and 12.3 L/min. These values were often not supplied or not the same as those in the manufacturer's specifications.

摘要

重症监护病房(ICU)中最近使用的许多呼吸机都有一个用于间歇性气流的需求阀。虽然需求系统能节省气流,但患者对其的耐受性似乎不如连续气流系统。我们使用一个机械模型来模拟患者的自主呼吸努力,在间歇性模式下测试了九种常见的呼吸机。它们的敏感度在-2.0至-0.2厘米水柱之间,总延迟时间在19至92毫秒之间。初始吸气阻力在0.03至0.10厘米水柱/升×分钟之间,初始流速在2.5至12.3升/分钟之间。这些值往往未提供,或者与制造商规格中的值不同。

相似文献

1
A comparison of intermittent mandatory ventilation systems.间歇性强制通气系统的比较
Crit Care Med. 1986 May;14(5):499-502. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198605000-00014.

引用本文的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验