Suppr超能文献

经皮低频电刺激正中神经和肘神经对手握力的影响:一项随机双盲对照试验。

The effect on handgrip strength of low-frequency percutaneous electric stimulation applied to the median and cubital nerves: A randomized, double-blind controlled trial.

作者信息

Álvarez David Martín-Caro, Serrano-Muñoz Diego, Fernández-Pérez Juan José, Moreno Jaime Salom, Gómez-Soriano Julio, Avendaño-Coy Juan

机构信息

Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing of Toledo, Toledo Physiotherapy Research Group (GIFTO), Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain.

出版信息

Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2023 Apr;306(4):720-727. doi: 10.1002/ar.24887. Epub 2022 Feb 15.

Abstract

Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS) consists of applying an electric current of <1,000 Hz to different neuromuscular structures through acupuncture needles. Currently, there is controversy surrounding the effect of PENS on muscle strength in the scientific literature. The main objective was to assess the effect of PENS applied to the median and cubital nerves on the maximum handgrip strength (MHS) compared to sham stimulation, as well as to determine the safety of the intervention. A parallel, randomized, double-blind controlled trial in a sample of 20 healthy subjects. Participants were randomly allocated in the experimental (n = 10) and control (n = 10) groups. A blinded researcher measured MHS. Measurements of MHS of the dominant hand were taken at four time points: preintervention, immediately postintervention, 24 hr after the intervention, and at a 10-day follow-up. A 10-Hz percutaneous electrical current stimulation was employed. The control group also received the same puncture method but with no electric stimulation. Compared to baseline, the MHS decreased 10.4% (SEM = 3.2, p = .02) in the PENS group at 24 hr postintervention, with no differences observed between baseline and at 10 days postintervention. No changes in grip strength were observed at any time point in the sham group. To sum up, PENS decreased MHS at 24 hr postintervention, which does not persist 10 days after the stimulation. PENS can be considered a safe technique. Trials with larger sample sizes are required to corroborate the findings of this study. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT, NCT04662229, filed on March 12th of 2020.

摘要

经皮电神经刺激(PENS)是指通过针灸针将频率低于1000赫兹的电流施加于不同的神经肌肉结构。目前,科学文献中关于PENS对肌肉力量的影响存在争议。主要目的是评估与假刺激相比,将PENS应用于正中神经和肘神经对最大握力(MHS)的影响,并确定该干预措施的安全性。对20名健康受试者进行了一项平行、随机、双盲对照试验。参与者被随机分为实验组(n = 10)和对照组(n = 10)。由一名不知情的研究人员测量MHS。在四个时间点测量优势手的MHS:干预前、干预后立即、干预后24小时以及10天随访时。采用10赫兹的经皮电流刺激。对照组也采用相同的穿刺方法,但不进行电刺激。与基线相比,PENS组在干预后24小时MHS下降了10.4%(标准误=3.2,p = 0.02),干预后10天与基线之间未观察到差异。假刺激组在任何时间点均未观察到握力变化。综上所述,PENS在干预后24小时降低了MHS,但在刺激后10天并未持续。PENS可被认为是一种安全的技术。需要更大样本量的试验来证实本研究的结果。临床试验注册:NCT,NCT04662229,于2020年3月12日提交。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验