Mind and Behavior Technological Center, Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Faculty of Law, Giustino Fortunato University, Benevento, Italy.
Cephalalgia. 2022 Jul;42(8):739-748. doi: 10.1177/03331024221075081. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
First, we investigated whether the exposure to different visual feedback conditions may modulate pain perception by means of visual induced analgesia in patients with chronic migraine. Second, to comprehend the way emotional face expressions could induce visual analgesia, we evaluated the degree of identification with the four experimental conditions.
In a 1 × 4 within-subject study design, 38 female chronic migraine patients were exposed to different visual stimuli - positive face, neutral face, negative face, and control (white screen) - during a migraine attack. Visual stimuli were presented 3 times in a randomized order (each condition lasted 40 seconds). Migraine pain ratings and identification scores were assessed immediately after the observation of each visual condition.
We observed a significant difference in pain ratings between the positive (median: 30, 95% CI 26.69 to 38.20) and the negative (median: 30, 95% CI 33.09 to 44.13) ( = -4.46, < 0.0001) facial expressions or the neutral facial expression (median: 30, 95% CI 31.89 to 42.41) ( = 3.41, < 0.001). Participants identified more with the neutral face condition than with the other conditions.
Observation of a positive emotional face resulted sufficient to modulate pain perception possibly via the mediation of emotion regulation for positive emotions. This study paves the way for the integration of new cognitive behavioural interventions based on the adoption of visual induced analgesia to further control pain perception in chronic migraine patients.
首先,我们研究了在慢性偏头痛患者中,不同视觉反馈条件的暴露是否可以通过视觉诱导镇痛来调节疼痛感知。其次,为了理解情绪面部表情如何引起视觉镇痛,我们评估了对四种实验条件的认同程度。
在一项 1×4 的单因素被试内设计中,38 名女性慢性偏头痛患者在偏头痛发作期间暴露于不同的视觉刺激 - 正性面孔、中性面孔、负性面孔和对照(白色屏幕)。视觉刺激以随机顺序呈现 3 次(每种条件持续 40 秒)。在观察完每种视觉条件后,立即评估偏头痛疼痛评分和识别评分。
我们观察到正性(中位数:30,95%置信区间 26.69 至 38.20)和负性(中位数:30,95%置信区间 33.09 至 44.13)( = -4.46, < 0.0001)面部表情或中性面部表情(中位数:30,95%置信区间 31.89 至 42.41)( = 3.41, < 0.001)之间的疼痛评分存在显著差异。参与者对中性面孔条件的认同度高于其他条件。
观察到积极的情绪面孔足以调节疼痛感知,可能是通过积极情绪的情绪调节来实现。这项研究为整合基于视觉诱导镇痛的新认知行为干预铺平了道路,以进一步控制慢性偏头痛患者的疼痛感知。